TODAY'S CASE (INDIRECT TAX)

April 30, 2024

++ CT - Option of review cannot be utilised as a method of rehearing or appeal and there must be finality to a litigation: HC

++ ST - As agreement with foreign supplier was on C.I.F basis and it was foreign supplier who entered into an agreement with foreign shipping line for transportation of goods, hence appellant not being a service recipient was not liable to pay service tax on amount of ocean freight: CESTAT

++ CX - Entire chain, right from procurement of aluminium ingots from NALCO upto delivery of aluminium conductors, transaction was established and accepted by Settlement Commission, no scope for Adjudicating Authority to confirm demand of Cenvat credit: CESTAT

++ Cus - Warehousing - None of the provisions have been contravened or violated by appellants inasmuch as in respect of all B/Es, the activities were carried out with approval and necessary permission given by department as well as under supervision of Customs - goods not liable for confiscation/penalty: CESTAT

++ GST - No hearing notice sent - Petitioner was prejudiced inasmuch as he could not be present at the time of personal hearing and the case was decided in his absence adversely - Matter remanded: HC

++ GST - A taxpayer's registration can be cancelled with retrospective effect only where consequences of customers being denied ITC are intended and warranted: HC

++ GST - Proper Officer has not applied his mind to the replies submitted but merely held that the same is not proper - This ex facie shows non-application of mind - Order set aside and matter remanded: HC

++ GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply submitted is unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details from petitioner - Matter remitted: HC

++ GST - CBIC is directed to look into the issue of automatic generation of non-migrated GST numbers and take rectificatory steps to identify such non-migrated numbers and cancellation thereof: HC

++ ST - GTA Service supplied by assessee & Service Tax already paid by service recipient - same activity cannot be taxed again in hands of service provider under SOTG service - no scope for double taxation in statute: CESTAT

++ CX - As Unit No. I is entitled to take CENVAT Credit of duty paid by Unit No. II, it is a revenue neutral situation, thus extended period of limitation cannot be invoked: CESTAT

April 29, 2024

++ Cus - High Courts are barred from hearing appeals involving issues of valuation of imported goods; appeals dismissed as not maintainable: HC

++ GST - There is no material on record to show as to why the registration is sought to be cancelled retrospectively - Order cannot be sustained: HC

++ GST - SCN does not put the petitioner to notice that the registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively, therefore, petitioner did not have any opportunity to object to the same - Order modified: HC

++ GST - A taxpayer's registration can be cancelled with retrospective effect only where such consequences are intended and are warranted: HC

++ GST - Rule 86A - Single Judge was correct in relegating appellant to his alternate remedy of replying to SCNs and getting matter adjudicated by adjudicating authority: HC

++ ST -Simultaneous filing of refund applications by service provider/KSFE and the service recipients/petitioners for same amount - Applications ought not to be rejected on technical issue when applications filed in time: HC

++ ST - Court cannot examine the issue, which is only a question of fact and evidence and not of the law - Petition dismissed: HC

++ CX - Department ought not to have waited for rebate proceedings to get finalized and ought to have issued SCN within normal period: CESTAT

++ Cus - As Section 149 prior to its amendment, does not prescribe any time limit, the Board vide Circular 36/2010 cannot impose a time limit so as to decline the request for amendment of shipping bill: CESTAT

April 27, 2024

++ CX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTAT

++ Cus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTAT

++ ST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTAT

April 26, 2024

++ ST - Amendment made to FA, 1994 on 14.05.2015 making service tax applicable retrospectively on chit-fund business is only prospective - Refund payable of tax paid between 01.07.2012 to 13.05.2015: HC

++ ST - SVLDRS, 2019 - Amnesty Scheme, being of the nature of an exemption from the requirement to pay the actual tax due to the government, have to be considered strictly in favour of the revenue: HC

++ CX - Issue involved is valuation of goods u/r 10A of CE Valuation Rules, 2000 - Appeal lies before Supreme Court: HC

++ Cus - Smuggling - A person carrying any article on his belonging would be presumed to be aware of the contents of the articles being carried by him: HC

++ Cus - Penalty that could be imposed for smuggling 3.2 kg of gold was Rs.88.40 lakhs, being the value of gold, but what is imposed is Rs.10 lakhs - Penalty not at all disproportionate: HC

++ Cus - Keeping in mind the balance of convenience and irreparable injury which may be caused to Revenue, importer to continue indemnity bond of 115 crore and possession of confiscated diamonds to remain with department: HC

++ Cus - OIA was passed in October 2022 remanding the matter to adjudicating authority but matter not yet disposed of - Six weeks' time granted to dispose proceedings: HC

++ ST - Appellant is an 'authorised medical practitioner' providing 'healthcare services' - services exempted in terms of  clause 2(i) of notification 25/2012-ST: Commr(A)

++ Cus - When Department has not complied with time limit, the order issued for revocation of licence or order issued for continuation of suspension licence cannot sustain: CESTAT

++ Cus -'Small Form-factor Pluggable Optical Transceivers' are classifiable under CTH 8517 7090 and not under CTH 8517 62 90 - entitled for benefit of duty concession under 57/2017-Cus: CESTAT

++ CX - Appellant is eligible for exemption under Notfn 12/2012-CE upon fulfilling all conditions stipulated therein, thus sufficiently establishing that goods dealt with by Appellants qualify for exemption: CESTAT

April 25, 2024

++ GST - On the one hand, the order states registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively and on the other hand mentions that there are no dues - Order modified: HC

++ GST - Registration cancelled retrospectively on ground that physical verification revealed that the firm was non-existent - Petitioner had informed that they shifted business and had sought cancellation of registration - Order cancelling registration modified: HC

++ GST - Since registration was cancelled, petitioner could not access portal and view the SCNs and file replies - Order set aside and matter remitted: HC

++ GST - Reply filed is a detailed one and if the proper officer was of the view that the same was unsatisfactory, he should have specifically sought further details - Matter is remitted: HC

++ GST - SCN does not put petitioner to notice that the registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively - Order set aside and registration restored: HC

++ GST - Non-application of mind - Proper officer has merely observed that the reply filed is unclear and unsatisfactory and, therefore, the demand is confirmed - Matter remitted for re-adjudication: HC

++ Commercial Tax - Judgment of High Court is in jeopardy once appeal is entertained by Supreme Court - Appeals shall remain pending before the Appellate Board, Bench at Indore, till the issue is decided by Apex Court: HC

++ ST - As the job-work undertaken by appellant amounts to manufacture, service tax cannot be levied on them under both Heads 'Business Auxiliary Service' and 'Business Support Service': CESTAT

++ CX - Existence of corroborative evidence is essential in order to establish clandestine removal of goods and same cannot be merely based on assumptions and presumptions: CESTAT

April 24, 2024

++ ST - Chit Funds - Tax was not paid under mistake of law but upon demand by tax authorities - Refund not having been filed within time was rightly rejected: HC

++ GST - Without considering the reply on merits, proper officer, without applying his mind has held that the reply is filed is unsatisfactory and, therefore, he is left with no alternative but to create demand - Order set aside and matter remitted: HC

++ GST - Cancellation of registration retrospectively - Show Cause Notice and the impugned order are bereft of any details, accordingly the same cannot be sustained: HC

++ GST - Registration could not have been cancelled retrospectively for the period for which returns were filed and taxpayer was compliant: HC

++ GST - Notfn 11/2017-CTR amended by 03/2022-CTR - Work contracts executed before 18 July 2022 - Petitioners should file refund claims before respondent authorities agitating their grievance and the same be examined and orders passed within four months: HC

++ GST - Entire tax liability has been realised by appropriating the amount from the petitioner's bank account, therefore, Revenue interest stands fully secured - Since tax proposal was confirmed without participation of petitioner, order set aside and matter remanded: HC

++ ST - Department cannot retain any amount which is otherwise not payable by the Assessee; nothing acts as embargo on assessee's right to demand refund of tax paid under misaken notion: CESTAT

++ Cus - If noticee seeks Cross Examination of such persons, same should be granted, appellant will produce all documentary evidence before Adjudicating Authority in support of their claim that seized gold is part of their normally procured gold in course of their commercial transactions: CESTAT

April 23, 2024

++ GST - s.107(11) - There is no fetter on the powers of the appellate authority to modify the order passed u/s 130(2) by the adjudicating authority: HC

++ GST - Statutory mandate of sub-section (4) of Section 75 is that a personal hearing should be provided either, if requested for, or if an order adverse to the taxpayer is proposed to be issued: HC

++ GST - Documents with regard to service of notice could not be located; that impugned orders came be to be passed without an opportunity being granted to Petitioner to submit documents and being heard - Matter remanded: HC

++ CX - The activity of waste water treatment is part of manufacturing activity and any activity which is directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture would be eligible for credit: CESTAT

++ ST - Appellant has collected some service tax from service recipient, which has been deposited with Department, same shall not be refunded to appellant: CESTAT

April 22, 2024

++ ST - There is no irregularity or illegal infirmity in the SCNs issued by Additional Director General of the Directorate of GST Intelligence - Provisions regarding assessment under CA, 1962 and FA, 1994 are not pari materia : HC

++ GST- ITC demand - It is just and appropriate that petitioner be provided an opportunity to produce relevant documents to prove actual movement of goods- Matter remanded on condition that petitioner remits 20% of disputed tax: HC

++ GST - Seizure of cash - Since amount seized has been handed over to the IT department, remedy for release lies with that department: HC

++ Cus - Amendment of BoE - s.149 is an additional remedy available - Stand of respondents that only reassessment u/s 128 is the remedy available is not tenable: HC

++ Cus - Regulation 5(2) of Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 is ultra vires CA, 1962 - Department has no authority to impose cost recovery charges: HC

++ ST - Activity of Mandi Samiti in renting out space/immovable property after 01.07.2012 is included in Negative List; Service Tax demand raised under Renting of Immovable Property Service merits being quashed: CESTAT

++ CX - Assessee was not required to reverse the credit under Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules in respect of bagasse and press-mud being cleared by them: CESTAT

April 20, 2024

++ CX - Appellant has regularly filed statutory returns on monthly basis and the fact of clearance of goods and availment of credit was duly reflected in returns but same has not been examined by authorities below, impugned order is not sustainable: CESTAT

++ ST - When services are received from separate source & accounted separately in separate ledgers, there cannot be any question of clubbing them under one category: CESTAT

++ Cus - The continuous suspension of license of Customs Broker without either conducting an inquiry or issuing a notice for revocation of license or imposition of penalty is bad in law and needs to be set aside: CESTAT

April 19, 2024

++ GST - Assessing officer took into account the evidence placed on record and drew conclusions - Bench is, therefore, of the view that petitioner should present a statutory appeal: HC

++ GST - Tax liability was imposed because petitioner replied without annexing documents - It is just and appropriate that an opportunity be provided to contest tax demand on merits, albeit by putting petitioner on terms: HC

++ GST - To effectively contest the demand and provide an opportunity to petitioner to place all relevant documents, matter remanded but by protecting revenue interest: HC

++ GST - Petitioner has failed to avail opportunities granted repeatedly - Court cannot entertain request for remand as there has been no procedural impropriety and infraction of any provision by assessing authority: HC

++ GST - Classification - Matter which had stood examined by Principal Commissioner is being treated differently by Additional Commissioner - Prima facie , approach appears to be perverse: HC

++ ST - Service Tax paid in respect of export of services and cannot be subject to levy of Service Tax under Notfn 18/2009-ST, denial of exemption on procedural lapses cannot be sustained: CESTAT

++ CX - The warranty service is eligible for credit though the same is provided after clearance of final products: CESTAT

April 18, 2024

++ Cus - As wife of appellant has already been penalized for the offence related to importation of BMW M5 Car, no reason found to impose penalty against appellant for same offence: CESTAT

++ Cus - Mere fact that Commissioner of Customs has filed an affidavit would not denude an officer, otherwise empowered under the Act/Rules to issue and adjudicate a SCN even though the officer may be below the rank of Commissioner: HC

++ GST - Conclusions were recorded in the assessment order without providing a personal hearing - Order set aside and matter remanded: HC

++ GST - Challenge to notification 11/2017-CTR clarifying the aspect of transfer of development rights being attracted to GST/TGST is devoid of merits: HC

++ GST - Transfer of development rights is amenable to GST and cannot be brought within the purview of Entry 5 of Schedule-III: HC

++ GST - Once the notification itself has been declared as ultra vires, applying it would amount to applying an illegal notification: HC

++ GST - Petitioner has an appellate remedy against the impugned order - As petition was filed within the original period of limitation, it is just and appropriate that petitioner be permitted to present statutory appeal: HC

++ GST - Injustice would be caused unless petitioner is provided another opportunity to contest tax demand on merits - Subject to deposit of 10% of demand, matter is remanded: HC

++ GST - Except for holding that the taxpayer had availed ITC which is blocked credit u/s 17(5), no reasons are specified - Order set aside and matter remanded: HC

++ Cus - There cannot be an exercise of jurisdiction to injunct invocation of BG, as it is a settled principle of law that bank guarantee constitutes an independent contract between the bank and the party in whose favour BG is furnished: HC

April 17, 2024

++ GST - Malabar 'Parota' Is Akin To 'Bread', Exigible To 5% GST: HC

++ ST - Principles of constructive res judicata applies - Petitioner cannot seek to assail proceedings on grounds which were available to be raised in first round of litigation: HC

++ GST - If the Proper Officer was of the view that any further details were required, the same could have been specifically sought before passing any order - Matter remitted: HC

++ GST - Proper Officer has not applied his mind to the reply submitted and has merely held it to be devoid of merits - Order set aside and matter remitted: HC

++ GST - Order was issued without hearing the petitioner - It is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to petitioner to contest the tax demand on merits: HC

++ GST - Classification - It is incumbent on the respondent to duly consider all contentions raised by petitioner objectively without any pre-determination: HC

++ GST - Whether the amount reflected as ITC tallies with the value of credit notes issued - Petitioner's explanation not duly examined - Matter remanded: HC

++ GST - Ice cream placed at par with Pan Masala and tobacco - No reason assigned by Council to exclude Ice Cream manufacturers from Composition Scheme - Socio-economic effect should have been taken into consideration - Council should reconsider: HC

++ VAT - Input Credit - mere production of invoices or payment made by cheques/RTGS is enough to discharge burden of proof upon assessee: HC

++ CX - In absence of sufficient evidence, imposition of penalty on Director merely being in-charge of company cannot be sustained, also, in SCN, there has been no proposal nor any allegation indicating that goods which were cleared are liable for confiscation: CESTAT

++ ST - Transportation service rendered for period after 01.07.2012, not covered under Rule 11 of Place of Provision of Service Rules, for determining place of provision of service, where present case does not meet requirement of continuous journey as per Rule 2(d) of POPS Rules: CESTAT

++ Cus - In respect of commercial invoice, which shows no details of duty paid, question of taking of any credit would not arise at all : CESTAT

++ Cus -   Aircraft   Rules, 1937 define 'maintenance' as including 'replacement' - Prototypes imported for upgradation of aircraft are entitled for exemption in terms of Sr. 303 of notfn. 12/2012-Cus: CESTAT

April 16, 2024

++ GST - Merely, because a taxpayer has not filed returns for some period does not mean that registration is required to be cancelled with retrospective date also covering the period when returns were filed: HC

++ GST - Retrospective cancellation of registration - Complete non-application of mind - Order refers to a reply filed whereas fact is that the proprietor had passed away and no reply had been filed: HC

++ GST - Proper officer has not applied his mind but dismissed the reply submitted as not satisfactory - Order set aside and matter remitted: HC

++ Cus - Acceptance of re-assessed value & voluntary payment, per se cannot be deemed to be admission to alleged mis-declaration of value - Burden rests with Department to establish allegations: CESTAT

++ CX - Bituminized Hessain Tape, Rot-proofed Bituminized Hessian Cloth mixed with Copper Napthalate, Bituminized Cotton Tape, being used for industrial purposes, is rightly classified under CTH 5909; benefit under Notfn No 175/86 is also allowed to manufacturer: CESTAT

April 15, 2024

++ GST - Cancellation of registration retrospectively - SCN and impugned order are bereft of any details - Since petitioner does not wish to carry on business, the registration is to be treated as cancelled from the date of such closure: HC

++ GST - SCN and impugned order are bereft of any details - Accordingly, the same cannot be sustained - Moreover, order does not spell out reasons for retrospective cancellation: HC

++ GST - Husband of proprietress expired after prolonged illness, therefore, reply could not be filed against SCN - Ex- parte order is set aside and matter remitted: HC

++ GST - On the one hand, order states that no reply is filed and on the other hand refers to a reply dated 07.01.2022, which shows complete non-application of mind, particularly when Proprietor had passed away without filing any reply: HC

++ GST - 03/2023-CT - Application for revocation of cancellation of registration - Liberal approach is required to be taken - Petitioner can file application now: HC

++ CX - Even if availed cenvat credit is debited subsequent to clearance of goods, it is to be treated as if cenvat credit was never availed: CESTAT

++ ST - TDS deposited to Income Tax Department in relation to payment made to foreign service provider over and above the invoice value of services, is not liable to service tax, accordingly, demand confirmed in impugned order is not sustainable: CESTAT

April 13, 2024

++ Cus - Since the Department has failed to even issue SCN and they have not taken any action during last four years, they have no right to retain the amount nor can they proceed further in this case: CESTAT

++ CX - Charges of clandestine removal of final goods, are invalidated where based solely on recovery of parallel invoices & without making corroborative statements & also based on third party statements, but without permitting cross examination of their deponents: CESTAT

++ CX - Credit availed on outward transportation services is eligible when freight charges are included in taxable value, there is no requirement for an assessee to furnish one-to-one co-relation of input services and credit availed: CESTAT

++ Cus - Since the appellant is a small time gold melting person, imposing penalty of Rs. 20 Lakhs when the absolutely confiscated gold bars are worth of Rs. 90 Lakhs, is very harsh on him, same is reduced to Rs. 2 Lakhs : CESTAT

April 12, 2024

++ GST - Circular 108/27/2019-GST cannot override the provisions of the substantive rules framed under the CGST Act: HC

++ GST - Shocking state of affairs - Approach not conducive to international trade and commerce - Internal or departmental conflicts cannot cause prejudice to the assessee: HC

++ GST - Merely because electronic portals did not make appropriate provisions, entitlement of petitioner to receive refund, being an entitlement under the IGST Act, cannot be defeated: HC

++ ST - s.73(4B) of FA, 1994 - True import and spirit of the provision required expediency on part of Assessing Officer and which has not been scrupulously complied with - Proceedings ought to have been completed within an year: HC

++ ST - Avoiding multiple litigation - Public money blocked - Petitioner's request for early hearing of matter by Tribunal allowed: HC

++ GST - Disallowance of ITC on the ground that ISD did not file GSTR Form-6 - No coercive action during pendency of petition: HC

++ GST - Provisional release of goods and conveyance - Ad interim relief granted on payment of penalty and fine and execution of bond: HC

++ GST - Issue of levy of GST on residential accommodation should be viewed from the perspective of recipient of service and not from perspective of service provider, who offers the premises on rental basis: HC

++ GST - Renting out hostel rooms to girl students and working women by petitioners is exclusively for residential purpose - Exemption available from levy in terms of 12/2017-CTR: HC

April 11, 2024

++ GST - Demand of Rs.20 crores confirmed by observing that reply filed is not clear and is unsatisfactory - Proper officer ought to have given an opportunity to petitioner and sought clarification - Matter remitted: HC

++ GST - Non-application of mind - If Proper Officer was of the view that reply is not clear and unsatisfactory and if any further details were required, same could have been specifically sought: HC

++ GST - Petitioner was not directed to produce any bank payment proofs for being held eligible to claim ITC - If an opportunity is granted, petitioner claims that they would produce the same - Order set aside and matter remitted: HC

++ GST - Amnesty from late fee given for late filers of GSTR-9 - No justification in continuing with notices for non-payment of late fee for belated GSTR-9C: HC

++ CT - Having failed to avail the statutory remedy of appeal within the prescribed time, petition filed is not maintainable: HC

++ Cus - Nature of goods need to be determined by way of proper test/ technical literature for which the matter is remanded for re-consideration to adjudicating authority: CESTAT

++ CX - Invocation of extended period for demanding differential duty on the redetermined value by the Revenue, in absence of suppression of facts or mis-declaration, cannot be sustained: CESTAT

++ ST - Advertisement services - Exclusion clause in Explanation 2 of rule 2(k) of CCR, 2004 is applicable to a manufacturer and not to a service provider - Cenvat credit permissible on MS angles, shapes, sections etc. used for erection of hoardings: CESTAT

April 10, 2024

++ ST/GST - A State does not have to tax everything in order to tax something - Challenge to reverse charge notifications is plainly unmerited: HC

++ ST/GST - An assessee, which is not liable to pay tax on output has no liability against which it can set off the input tax credit - s.17(3) deeming supply of recovery agent as exempted supplies is legal: HC

++ ST - SVLDRS, 2019 - Without issuing Form SVLDRS-2, the Designated Committee has straight away issued SVLDRS-3, thereby depriving the Petitioner of an opportunity of personal hearing - Matter remanded: HC

++ Cus - Once the bond had lapsed, it was not permissible for respondents to impose a recovery which would be alien to the provisions of Customs Act: HC

++ Cus - Matter involves disputed questions of fact as to whether the notices were served upon petitioner or not by respondent-authority - Petition dismissed as there is alternative efficacious remedy available: HC

++ ST - Activity of giving tips/information on shares would not fall under definition of 'banking and other financial services' and consequently not liable for demand of service tax: CESTAT

++ CX - Charges of clandestine removal were not founded on any cogent evidence & relied heavily on supposedly unaccounted clearance of scrap; penalties on Assessee-companies quashed: CESTAT

++ Cus - Rejection of transaction value declared by importer & enhancement thereof is unsustainable, where based solely on NIDB data & without following procedure given in Section 14 of Customs Act: CESTAT

April 09, 2024

++ GST - Since registration was cancelled, taxpayer could not have accessed the portal and there is merit in the contention that petitioner was not served with the impugned SCN - Order set aside and matter remitted: HC

++ GST - Order does not specifically deal with the reply given by the petitioner but merely says that it is insufficient and unsatisfactory - Order set aside and matter remitted: HC

++ GST - Rectification orders passed by department - Fresh applications, for refund of excess GST amount paid, to be filed by petitioner: HC

++ GST - Technical glitch in filing refund claim online now rectified - Date of filing manual application be considered as relevant date: HC

++ GST - Order, which is appealed against, is uploaded on common portal and same can be viewed by appellate authority - Requirement of submitting certified copy is insignificant - Amendment by 26/2022-CT is clarificatory, hence retrospective in operation: HC

++ Cus - The product literature provided by appellant very clearly shows that items are part of Animal Feed and not fit for Human consumption for preparation of medicines, the product Betine Hydrochloride falls under CETH 230990: CESTAT

++ ST - Before applying the ratio of any judgment, it needs to be seen whether the facts of both the cases are identical or otherwise, matter needs to go back for reconsideration in light of judgment in case of Cadila Healthcare : CESTAT

++ CX - Penalty imposed u/r 27 of Central Excise Rules 2002 is upheld where Assessee omitted to inform Department about clearance of goods upon closure of Pan Masala Packaging Machine: CESTAT

April 08, 2024

++ ST - Even if there was any service rendered in regard to quality checking, demand ought to have been raised against M/s. Fashion Force, who is the service provider for quality checking: CESTAT

++ ST - As per settled law, service provider or sub-contractor has to pay tax even if main contractor or service recipient has discharged tax liability on former's behalf: CESTAT

++ ST - Mala fide intent with intent to evade payment of tax cannot be alleged against assessee where dispute involves interpretation of law: CESTAT

++ ST - Mere failure to pay duty without any collusion, fraud or willful misstatement not sufficient to invoke extended period of limitation , more so where Assessee is regularly undergoing audit & where Department is aware of the dispute over payment of tax: CESTAT

++ Cus - Appeal to Commr. (A) dismissed on time bar, despite only 1-day delay in filing appeal; proof of service of order not brought on record either by Assessee or by Department; fresh opportunity given to Assessee to file appeal: CESTAT

++ Cus - In deciding an issue at hand, courts are only bound by evidence as available & placed on record in the matter under consideration; Courts cannot take cognizance of past offences to prejudice the present matter: CESTAT

++ CX - Appeal filed by Revenue is not maintainable before Tribunal since the appeal has been filed in a cyclostyled manner without appreciating the facts of case and without examining the impugned order: CESTAT

++ CX - Demand seeking reversal of Cenvat credit or payment of 6% tax on value of exempted items, in respect of Bagasse produced in course of manufacturing Sugar, is not tenable, where Board Circular on which demand is based, already stands quashed: CESTAT

April 06, 2024

++ CX - In absence of any sufficient cause having been shown, even on issue of limitation, delay is not liable to be condoned : HC

++ ST - SVLDRS, 2019 - Without issuing Form SVLDRS-2, Designated Committee has straight away issued Form SVLDRS-3, thereby depriving the Petitioner of an opportunity of a personal hearing - Matter remanded: HC

++ ST - SVLDRS, 2019 - If the time is extended for payment of amount determined by designated committee, it will tantamount to modifying the Scheme which is the prerogative of the Government: HC

April 05, 2024

++ CX - BTS shelters - Chain of 'input service' is tested by use in the hands of recipient who provides taxable service - Construction services, erection, commissioning & installation services, technical testing & analysis services are Input services for a telecom service provider: CESTAT (LB)

++ GST - To undertake a quasi-judicial adjudication is a solemn exercise which needs to be fulfilled with fairness and having all attributes of judicial adjudication: HC

++ GST - Issuance of summons under Section 70 of CGST Act is not hit by Section 6(2)(b) of CGST Act: HC

++ GST - In view of the fact that the basis of confirming rejection of refund was non-availability of certain record, which has now been verified by department, impugned order is set aside: HC

++ CX - CENVAT - Setting up of a factory premises providing for output services would fall into the definition of 'input service': HC

++ CX - Questions, which Revenue has raised in appeal are essentially questions of fact and there is no question of law which is required to be adjudicated - Appeal dismissed: HC

++ ST - SVLDRS, 2019 - Quantification of tax - Rejection, as generated by the electronic system is not correct in view of clarification by the Board by Circular 1071: HC

++ Cus - Proper Officer - Adjudicating authority is bound by the law laid down by Supreme Court in Canon India Ltd. case - To adjudicate within six months: HC

++ Cus - Pre-SCN consultation as mandated under proviso to s.28(1)(a) r/w Pre-Notice Consultation Regulation, 2018 not complied with while issuing SCNs, hence subsequent O-in-O and O-in-A are bad in law being void ab initio : HC

April 04, 2024

++ GST - SCN itself gave date of P.H. before expiry of 15 days from date of receipt of SCN to file reply; which is admittedly premature - Adjudicating authority was also in too much of hurry inasmuch as he passed order on the very next day - Matter remitted: HC

++ GST - Refund - Court, in exercise of its limited jurisdiction, cannot amend the statute and prescribe different time limits for moving refund application: HC

++ Cus - Once vessel was confiscated, property would vest in the Central government and resultantly, the mortgage of M/s Gujarat Maritime Board would come to an end - No due certificate to be issued to petitioner who bought vessel in auction: HC

++ Cus - Import of betel nuts - No fatal impurity so as to render the goods to be labelled as prohibitory - Taking such stand would render nugatory ruling of CAAR: HC

++ Cus - Appellant has not placed any order of NCLT declaring moratorium, therefore, Tribunal can continue with the hearing of appeal on merits: CESTAT

++ ST - Appeal to Commissioner (Appeals) filed beyond 90 days' extended limitation period, is not maintainable; hence, rightly dismissed: CESTAT

++ CX - Since impugned goods have been imported without payment of duty, inherent value of goods comprises element of Customs duty therein and therefore permission of allowing destruction of goods without authority of customs law will amount to arbitrary abatement of leviable customs duty: CESTAT

++ Cus - Apart from vague submission that original authority did not conduct thorough verification, there is no specific grounds raised that there is undervaluation, the argument in regard to amendment of Rule 10 is also not material to be considered as for the disputed period assessee has not paid any royalty or technical know-how fee: CESTAT

April 03, 2024

++ GST - Petitioner has not suffered any legal injury by the 101st Amendment especially since he is not registered - No locus standi - Petition dismissed: HC

++ GST - Petition was filed by reason of misguided over enthusiasm - Bench would have imposed cost but restrains itself - Petitioner cautioned: HC

++ GST - Petitioner specifically sought an opportunity of personal hearing but adjudicating authority opined that no hearing is required since detailed reply is submitted - Order is contrary to provisions of s.75(4): HC

++ GST - Amount of Rs.2,50,00,000/- was recovered by respondents - Whether it is genuinely a coercion or whether it was a voluntary deposit, is purely a disputed question of fact - Petition rejected: HC

++ VAT - Petitioner Bank has the first priority in respect of enforcement against Secured Assets by reason of s.26-E and having a prior registration of security interest with CERSAI - Attachment orders of MVAT authorities set aside: HC

++ Cus - It is not appropriate to classify imported articles by inferring from web-sites, even if of the supplier, or from quality certification awarded to supplier, and without subjecting imported goods to analysis & conformity to acceptable, or prescribed, standard: CESTAT

++ CX - Allegations of clandestine removal are not sustainable where Department does not discharge its burden of bolstering such charges with corroborative evidence: CESTAT

April 02, 2024

++ Stamp Duty - Delivery Order is not an extension of a Bill of Lading and both are mutually exclusive documents - Levying stamp duty on DO is well within the legislative competence of the State: HC

++ GST - Proper officer has merely held that the reply is not clear and unsatisfactory which ex-facie shows that he has not applied his mind - Matter remitted: HC

++ GST - Registration cancelled retrospectively - As petitioner does not seek to carry on business, registration shall be treated as cancelled w.e.f date when they applied for cancellation: HC

++ GST - If reply was unsatisfactory, proper officer could have sought further details - Order does not indicate that such an opportunity was given - Matter remitted: HC

++ GST - Merely because a taxpayer has not filed returns for some period does not mean that taxpayer's registration is required to be cancelled with retrospective date also covering the period when returns were filed and taxpayer was compliant: HC

++ CX - Valuation - Value of goods cannot be determined straightaway under Rules 7, 8 or 9 ov CVR 2007; Rules must be applied sequentially - valuation done otherwise is against the law: CESTAT

++ ST - Ownership of plant & machinery used for manufacture of excisable goods cannot per se be a criteria for charging Central Excise duty: CESTAT

++ ST - Supply of High Pressure Truck Mounted Mobile Air Compressor by Assessee to M/s ONGC on hire basis, for producing Compressed Air further utilised for oil exploration, will not attract tax under Mining Service as function of oil exploration is not entrusted to assessee: CESTAT

++ ST - Tax demands & imposition of penalties u/s 76, 77 & 78 of Finance Act 1994 are sustained where Assessee does not pay service tax on income derived from providing service of renting immovable property & no valid explanation is given for such default: CESTAT

April 01, 2024

++ ST - Revenue cannot, after being unsuccessful before HC, on its own, declare the refund to be erroneous - Open to Revenue to seek protection from Supreme Court: HC

++ ST - Petition dismissed by Single Judge with liberty to file appeal - Appellant has informed that they have filed appeal but a direction be issued to pass orders expeditiously - Directions issued: HC

++ ST - SVLDRS, 2019 - Usurping powers - Adjudicating authority could not have cancelled discharge certificate on the ground that declaration contains material particulars which are false: HC

++ Cus - Error of not marking 'Y' against the reward column is clearly an inadvertent error - MEIS benefits to be extended : HC

++ Haryana VAT - 362-day delay in filing appeal cannot be condoned where the legal officer concerned did not take steps to file appeals expeditiously: HC

++ ST - CENVAT Credit is allowed on telecast fees paid in respect of broadcasting of own programmes/serials by media company: CESTAT

++ ST - No Service Tax is payable by Municipal Corporation on activity of letting out road sides to cable TV & telecom operators for laying out Optical Fibre Cables: CESTAT

++ CX - Excess amount represents profit element, once this is so, same cannot be subjected to excise duty inasmuch as duty is leviable on manufacture of goods and not on profit: CESTAT

++ Cus - As per settled law, proceedings under different laws enacted for different purposes are no grounds for preferring one over the other: CESTAT