News Update

GST - Rule 89 - Refund of ITC - 14/2022-CT - Benefit that gets accrued by way of legislation cannot be denied/curtailed moreso when it is clarificatory in nature: HCGST - Refund of ITC - Production of shipping bills - Transmission of energy could not have been visualized when Rule 89(2) was incorporated in the Statute book: HCGST - Requiring petitioners to produce shipping bills, as proof of export cannot be made applicable to electricity as export can only be through transmission line, but not through rail, road or water for which documents can be made available: HCEconomy Needs Synergetic Inputs to fix twin Deficits of Inflation & Rupee fall43 injured in fire at Durga Puja pandals on UPAgriculture Income & ITR 7OPEC+ debate cutting production by 1 million barrels per day; Crude price up by 3%I-T - 6 months' limitation for deciding refund claims is to be followed strictly: HCBrazil’s Presidential elections: Neither candidates get 50% votes; Bolsonaro to face Lula in second round of pollI-T- Customs duty paid for yacht can be allowed as it is not used by assessee for its own personal use and has operated yacht for benefit and use of entities paying operating fee : ITATLanka reduces tax rate on sanitary napkins amid fiscal crisisI-T - No addition on account of bogus sundry creditors can be made, if AO fails to substantiate non-availability of vendors: ITATXiaomi expresses despair over attachment of Rs 5500 Cr assets in IndiaST - No service tax is payable on amount collected towards liquidated damages: CESTATTruss says her Chancellor decided himself to reduce UK’s rate for top tax bracketCX - There is no reason to deny refund when assessee has availed drawback of only the customs duty portion and not of excise duty: CESTATSexual assault case against founder of JD.com, China’s one of biggest e-commerce giants, settled in USCX - After 1.4.2011, appellant cannot avail credit on outdoor catering services, thus credit availed for period 1.4.2011 to 30.4.2011 which is part of SCN is not eligible for credit: CESTATIsrael, Lebanon about to hammer out deal on maritime tangled borderCus - First Appellate Authority was correct in allowing appeal thereby ordering provisional release of goods in question and since there is no change in facts, same is followed in case on hand as well: CESTATBurkina Faso’s junta leader agrees to dethrone himselfUkraine war - France’s spirited support being questioned; 2% arms support found lowest in EUDeath toll from Hurricane Ian mounts beyond 80 thus far in Florida & Carolina put togetherMexico braces up for Hurricane OrleneSP’s supremo Mulayam Singh Yadav is in ICU at Gurugram MedantaGovt reduces export duty on petro goods; makes Special Additional Excise Duty NIL for ATF; Rs 3.5 per litre on diesel & Rs 8000 per tonne for petrol125 die in Indonesian stampede after fans invade football ground and police hurl teargas; 180 injuredAnti-hijab fire spreads across Iran; Rallies organised throughout countryKing Charles III not to attend COP27 in Egypt on advice of Truss GovtUS, Venezuela swap prisoners - 7 Americans for 2 relatives of President MaduroUS, Japan & Australian Defence Ministers vow to work against Chinese military ambitionsWIPO’s Global Innovation Index - India walks up to 40th rankFM says IBC law cannot be allowed to lose its teeth and object
Untitled Document

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
NEW DELHI

NOTIFICATION

Dated: May 29, 2017

S.O. 1702(E).–Whereas, the Finance Act, 2017 (7 of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) received the assent of the President on 31st March, 2017;

And whereas, second proviso to sub-section (1) of section 184 of the said Act provides that the age of the Chairperson, Chairman or President shall not exceed seventy years and the age of the Vice-Chairperson, Vice-Chairman, Vice-President, Presiding Officer or any other Member shall not exceed sixty- seven years;

And whereas, such provision of the said Act had come into force on the 26th day of May, 2017;

And whereas, no person is qualified to be appointed as the Presiding Officer-

(a) of the Securities Appellate Tribunal established under the Securities Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), unless he is, or has been, a judge of Supreme Court or Chief Justice of High Court or a Judge of High Court for at least seven years;

(b) of the Industrial Tribunal constituted by the Central Government under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) unless he is, has been, or is qualified to be, a Judge of High Court; and

(c) of the Debts Recovery Tribunal established under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (51 of 1993) unless he is a Judge of District Court;

And whereas, a difficulty has arisen in giving effect to the aforesaid provisions of the said Act as a Judge of the Supreme Court or the Chief Justice of a High Court or a Judge of a High Court, after appointment as the Presiding Officer of Securities Appellate Tribunal may not be retired at the age of Sixty-five and his age of retirement be increase to the Seventy years as in case of the Chairperson or Chairman or President of Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, or as the case may be, Authority;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 189 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby makes the following Order, namely: -

1. Short title and commencement. - (1) This Order may be called the Finance (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2017.

(2) It shall come into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Finance Act, 2017 (7 of 2017), in section 184, in sub-section (1), in the second proviso, -

(i) in clause (a), for the words “or President”, the words “President or the Presiding Officer of the Securities Appellate Tribunal” shall be substituted;

(ii) in clause (b), after the words “Presiding Officer”, the words “of the Industrial Tribunal constituted by the Central Government and the Debts Recovery Tribunal” shall be inserted.

[F. No. A.50050/9/2016-Ad1C (CESTAT) Pt. I]

Udai Singh Kumawat,
Jt. Secy.