News Update

CBIC notifies withdrawal of 'Stop OOC' procedure for claim of exemption under FTAsCBIC notifies Customs Exchange ratesIndia-UAE trade pact - Last date for application of TRQ extended till May 31Ethanol production capacities up from 421 cr ltrs to 867 cr ltrsI-T - Addition made by AO in absence of any incriminating material, merely on basis of suo-motu disclosure made before ITSC, is not sustainable: ITATUS Senate passes USD 40 bn air package for UkrainePort Blair Airport to get new terminal building by October, 2022I-T - Assessment order, made on basis of statements recorded from third parties that are neither provided nor cross-examination is given to assessee, is bad in law : ITATMonkeypox cases travel from UK, EU to US & Canada nowOmicron BA.4 - First case detected in HyderabadCentre decides to lift Price Capping of Raw JuteI-T- Ad hoc disallowance of telecom expenses can't be made by merely stating that assessee could not justify business expediency : ITATFresh CBI cases against Lalu Yadav & his daughter; Raids roll outI-T - Delay in filing TDS quarterly statements is per se insufficient grounds to impose penalty, more so where reasonable explanation is given to explain such delay : ITATIndonesia decides to revoke embargo on exports of palm oil from next weekDelhi AIIMS says all tests costing under Rs 300 to be provided free from nowFM chairs Annual Meeting of Board of Governors of New Development BankG7 pledges USD 18 bn aid package for UkraineI-T- Reassessment proceedings are invalid as AO fails to indicate how and why assessee has failed to make full and true disclosure of all material facts necessary for assessment : ITATCanada notifies ban on China’s Huawei Technologies & ZTE Corp from 5G NetworksJaishankar says BRICS needs to honour territorial integrity of membersBiden to visit Samsung’s chip plant in Korea - reprieve for Samsung leader Jay Lee from court trialI-T - Additions u/s 153C invalid where no material incriminating the assessee is found in course of search proceedings : ITATOmicron dancing with tall numbers in N Korea - 2.64 lakhs in 24 hours + Daily cases soar to 8000 in New ZealandNational Geographic team sets up weather station on Mt EverestKey rates of China banks go south to buoy up roiled economyCanadian PM says China playing Western nations against each otherI-T- Addition for bogus purchases should be restricted to gross profit involved in such purchases : ITATPM going to Japan to attend Quad; to have bilateral talks with BidenCX - The power exercised by authority by issuing Demand-cum SCN is a statutory power conferred upon respondent authorities under Section 73 of FA, 1994 and as such issuance of SCN cannot be said to be without jurisdiction: HCInflation - Not 'wet-bulb conditions' thus far!Cus - As importer of goods will sell the goods after import, importer cannot file application to decide that such goods are being purchased as waste & scrap: HCDebroy releases State of Inequality in India ReportCX - Only arrears of land related revenue were to be borne by Purchaser and therefore outstanding amount of the previous owner cannot be realised from assessee: CESTATCustoms Duty on the mysterious washed ashore chariotCus - The review order passed by department is beyond the time-limit prescribed under section 129D (3) of Customs Act, 1962 and therefore appeals filed before Commissioner (A) are time-barred: CESTATCERT-In releases FAQs to address queries on Cyber Security DirectionsST - Since the amount deposited by appellant during audit is lying with Department as revenue deposit and for such amount there is no question of any limitation as provided under Section 11B, appellant is entitled to refund of said amount: CESTAT400 GIS-based maps ready under PM GatiShakti: GoyalCus - Procedure for export starts with filing of checklists on ICEGATE portal, if same is not backed by proper shipping bill within 15 days, checklist gets purged - It is not understood how the issuance of checklist by Customs Broker was a fraud under Customs Act: CESTAT
Untitled Document

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
GST POLICY WING
NEW DELHI

CIRCULAR NO

166/22/2021-GST, Dated: November 17, 2021

To,

The Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners/Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners of Central Tax (All)

The Principal Directors General/ Directors General (All)

Subject: Clarification on certain refund related issues- reg.

Various representations have been received from taxpayers and other stakeholders seeking clarification in respect of certain issues relating to refund. The issues have been examined. In order to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of the law across field formations, the Board, in exercise of its powers conferred by section 168(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "CGST Act"), hereby clarifies each of these issues as under:

S. No.
Issue
Clarification
1. Whether the provisions of sub- section (1) of section 54 of the CGST Act regarding time period, within which an application for refund can be filed, would be applicable in cases of refund of excess balance in electronic cash ledger? No, the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 54 of the CGST Act regarding time period, within which an application for refund can be filed, would not be applicable in cases of refund of excess balance in electronic cash ledger.
2. Whether certification/ declaration under Rule 89(2)(l) or 89(2)(m) of CGST Rules, 2017 is required to be furnished along with the application for refund of excess balance in electronic cash ledger? No, furnishing of certification/ declaration under Rule 89(2)(l) or 89(2)(m) of the CGST Rules, 2017 for not passing the incidence of tax to any other person is not required in cases of refund of excess balance in electronic cash ledger as unjust enrichment clause is not applicable in such cases.
3. Whether refund of TDS/TCS deposited in electronic cash ledger under the provisions of section 51 /52 of the CGST Act can be refunded as excess balance in cash ledger?

The amount deducted/collected as TDS/TCS by TDS/ TCS deductors under the provisions of section 51 /52 of the CGST Act, as the case may be, and credited to electronic cash ledger of the registered person, is equivalent to cash deposited in electronic cash ledger. It is not mandatory for the registered person to utilise the TDS/TCS amount credited to his electronic cash ledger only for the purpose for discharging tax liability. The registered person is at full liberty to discharge his tax liability in respect of the supplies made by him during a tax period, either through debit in electronic credit ledger or through debit in electronic cash ledger, as per his choice and availability of balance in the said ledgers.

Any amount, which remains unutilized in electronic cash ledger, after discharge of tax dues and other dues payable under CGST Act and rules made thereunder, can be refunded to the registered person as excess balance in electronic cash ledger in accordance with the proviso to sub-section
(1) of section 54, read with sub-section (6) of section 49 of CGST Act.

4. Whether relevant date for the refund of tax paid on supplies regarded as deemed export by recipient is to be determined as per clause (b) of Explanation (2) under section 54 of CGST Act and if so, whether the date of return filed by the supplier or date of return filed by the recipient will be relevant for the purpose of determining relevant date for such refunds?

Clause (b) of Explanation (2) under Section 54 of CGST Act reads as under:

"(b) in the case of supply of goods regarded as deemed exports where a refund of tax paid is available in respect of the goods, the date on which the return relating to such deemed exports is furnished;"

On perusal of the above, it is clear that clause (b) of Explanation (2) under section 54 of the CGST Act is applicable for determining relevant date in respect of refund of amount of tax paid on the supply of goods regarded as deemed exports, irrespective of the fact whether the refund claim is filed by the supplier or by the recipient.

Further, as the tax on the supply of goods, regarded as deemed export, would be paid by the supplier in his return, therefore, the relevant date for purpose of filing of refund claim for refund of tax paid on such supplies would be the date of filing of return, related to such supplies, by the supplier.

2. It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize the contents of this Circular.

3. Difficulty, if any, in the implementation of this Circular may be brought to the notice of the Board. Hindi version will follow.

[F.No. CBIC-20021/4/2021-GST]

(Sanjay Mangal)
Principal Commissioner

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
GST POLICY WING
NEW DELHI

CIRCULAR NO

165/21/2021-GST, Dated: November 17, 2021

To

The Principal Chief Commissioners / Chief Commissioners / Principal Commissioners /
Commissioners of Central Tax (All)

The Principal Directors General / Directors General (All)

Subject: Clarification in respect of applicability of Dynamic Quick Response (QR) Code on B2C invoices and compliance of notification 14/2020- Central Tax dated 21st March, 2020 - Reg.

Various references have been received from trade and industry seeking further clarification on applicability of Dynamic Quick Response (QR) Code on B2C (Registered person to Customer) invoices for compliance of notification 14/2020-Central Tax, dated 21st March, 2020 as amended. It has been represented that in some cases where, though the service recipient is located outside India and place of supply of the service is in India as per IGST Act 2017, the payment is received by the service provider located in India not in foreign exchange, but through other modes approved by RBI. In such cases, the supplier will not be fulfilling the condition specified in S. No. 4 of the Circular No. 156/12/2021 dated 21st June 2021, and accordingly, will be required to have dynamic QR code on the invoice. It has been also represented that relaxation from dynamic QR code on the invoices in such cases should be available if the payment is received through any RBI approved mode of payment, and not necessarily in foreign exchange.

2. The issues have been examined and in order to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of the law across the field formations, the Board, in exercise of its powers conferred under section 168(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, hereby clarifies the issues hereafter.

3. It is observed that from the present wording of S. No. 4 of Circular No. 156/12/2021 dated 21st June 2021, doubt arises whether the relaxation from the requirement of dynamic QR code on the invoices would be available to such supplier, who receives payments from the recipient located outside India through RBI approved modes of payment, but not in foreign exchange. It is mentioned that the intention of clarification as per S. No. 4 in the said circular was not to deny relaxation in those cases, where the payment is received by the supplier as per any RBI approved mode, other than foreign exchange.

4. Accordingly, to clarify the matter further, the Entry at S. No. 4 of the Circular No. 156/12/2021-GST dated 21st June, 2021 is substituted as below:

4. " In cases, where receiver of services is located outside India, and payment is being received by the supplier of services ,through RBI approved modes of payment, but as per provisions of the IGST Act 2017, the place of supply of such services is in India, then such supply of services is not considered as export of services as per the IGST Act 2017; whether in such cases, the Dynamic QR Code is required on the invoice issued, for such supply of services, to such recipient located outside India? No. Wherever an invoice is issued to a recipient located outside India, for supply of services, for which the place of supply is in India, as per the provisions of IGST Act 2017, and the payment is received by the supplier, in convertible foreign exchange or in Indian Rupees wherever permitted by the RBI, such invoice may be issued without having a Dynamic QR Code, as such dynamic QR code cannot be used by the recipient located outside India for making payment to the supplier."

5. Circular No. 156/12/2021-GST, dated 21.06.2021 stands modified to this extent.

6. It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize the contents of this circular.

7. Difficulty, if any, in the implementation of the above instructions may please be brought to the notice of the Board. Hindi version would follow.

[CBEC-20/16/38/2020 -GST]

(Sanjay Mangal)
Principal Commissioner