News Update

NHAI to go for assessment audit & rank roads for qualityUdhav Govt decides to permit hotels to reopen with 33% capacity from July 8GST - When appeal is provided under statute, writ remedy cannot be invoked by making High Court as middle authority between respondent CTO and appellate authority: HCIndia, China agree to disengage troops in Eastern LadakhGovt denies any move to merge CBDT & CBICNon-payment of consideration within 180 days and ITC reversal in GST (See 'THE INSIGHT' in Taxongo.com)Unlocking of economy - 30% firms operating at 70% capacity utilisation: SurveyCOVID-19 - Global tally spikes to 1.16 Crore with 5.37 lakh deaths + New cases - US inches close to 30 lakhs + 16 lakh in Brazil + India advances close to 7 lakh - third highest in worldKerala Customs seizes gold cargo worth Rs 13 CroreAvailability of ITC in respect of duty/tax paid after July 2017 for past transactions under CEA, 1944/FA, 1994/CA, 1962ST - Assessee collects, processes & stores data of MNREGA beneficiaries on behalf of a State Govt entity - such activity entails discharge of sovereign function & no service tax can be demanded thereon: CESTATTaxability of Trusts and InstitutionsSpike in COIVD-19 cases in Gujarat - Ahmedabad Pr CCIT office hunkers down to provide logistics & other support to patients in DepartmentCX - Valuation - Approach of Revenue by disintegrating the wholesale package and determining the value of individual components under separate provisions of the same Act is not permissible: CESTATCOVID-19 impact on Start-ups - 12% down shutters; 70% adversely hurtCX - Construction service was availed for construction of own manufacturing premises - credit admissible: CESTAT140 in race to develop vaccine for Coronavirus; COVAXIN gets official nodCus - Transaction value of imported goods cannot be rejected without showing any contemporaneous evidence of higher price - charges of undervaluation are unsustainable where no evidence exists to show that assessee & overseas buyers are related parties: CESTATProf Raghavan favours use of CSR funds for R&DReceipt of cash gift through banking channels is per se insufficient to establish creditworthiness of donor or genuineness of such gift: HCProvisions of Section 2(22)(e) cannot be invoked where assessee-company maintains running transactions with its subsidiary: ITATExpenses incurred on repair & annual maintenance of computers are revenue expenses & are eligible for deduction: ITATCOVID-19 - Recovery Rate - Five States report over 80% + 9 States between 70-80 per cent + India’s averages about 60.77 per centGenetic risk score to be reliable tool in diagnosing type-1 diabetes in India
Untitled Document

[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i)]

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
NEW DELHI

NOTIFICATION NO

29/2020-Customs, Dated: June 06, 2020

Whereas in the matter concerning imports of “Phthalic Anhydride” (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods) falling under tariff item 2917 35 00 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the Customs Tariff Act), the Director General of Trade Remedies (hereinafter referred to as the Authority) initiated an investigation in terms of the India-Korea Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (Bilateral Safeguard Measures) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the said rules) vide initiation notification under F.No.22/8/2019-DGTR, dated the 1st October, 2019 published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary dated the 1st October, 2019 in order to determine whether the imports of the subject goods from Korea RP constitute increased imports and whether the increased imports have caused or are threatening to cause serious injury to the domestic industry.

And whereas, in the preliminary findings of the Bilateral Safeguard investigation issued vide F.No.22/8/2019-DGTR, dated the 11th May, 2020, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary dated the 11th May, 2020, the Authority has provisionally concluded that-

(i) the domestic industry has suffered serious injury as a result of duty concessions granted to Korean imports leading to increased imports of the subject goods from Korea at low prices;

(ii) the domestic industry is faced with continued threat of serious injury from imports from Korea;

(iii) that injury to the domestic industry has been caused by the increased imports and there is a causal link between increased imports of subject goods from Korea and serious injury and threat of serious injury to the domestic industry as a result of duty concessions granted to Korean imports;

(iv) the factors present constitute critical circumstances and are affecting the overall performance of the domestic industry, justifying imposition of provisional bilateral safeguard measure,

and has recommended imposition of the provisional bilateral safeguard measure of increasing the rate of customs duty on subject goods originating in Korea RP imported under the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between the Republic of India and the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as the Trade Agreement), to the level of Most Favoured Nation duty on the subject goods as on the date of application of the bilateral safeguard measure or Most Favoured Nation duty on the subject goods on the day immediately preceding the date of entry into force of the Trade Agreement, whichever is less, for a period of 200 days.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) read with rule 9 of the said rules, the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No.152/2009-Customs, dated the 31st December, 2009, published in the Gazette of India, vide number G.S.R. 943 (E), dated the 31st December, 2009, namely-

In the said notification,-

(i) in the Table, for serial number 230 and the entries relating thereto, the following serial number and entries shall be substituted, namely:-

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
“230. 2917 33 to 2917 34 All goods 0.00”;

(ii) in the Table, after serial number 230 and the entries relating thereto, the following serial numbers and entries shall be inserted, namely:-

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
“230A 2917 35 00 All goods 0.00”;
230B. 2917 35 00 All goods 7.50”;

(iii) after the Table, the following shall be inserted, namely-

“Provided that, to give effect to the provisional bilateral safeguard measure, as recommended by the Director General of Trade Remedies,-

(a) nothing contained in serial number 230A and entries relating thereto in the said Table shall have effect up to and inclusive of the 21st day of January 2021, and

(b) the entries contained in serial number 230B in the said Table shall have effect up to and inclusive of the 21st day of January 2021; unless revoked, superseded or amended earlier.”.

[F. No.354/51/2020-TRU]

Gaurav Singh
Deputy Secretary to the Government ofIndia

Note: The principal notification No. 152/2009-Customs, dated the 31st December, 2009 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-Section (i) vide number G.S.R. 943 (E), dated the 31st December, 2009 and was last amended vide notification No. 36/2019-Customs, dated the 30th December, 2019, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3,Sub- Section (i), vide number G.S.R. 964 (E), dated the 30th December, 2019.