News Update

CAG's Audit Report on Entertainment Sector - An Overview (See 'THE TOG INSIGHT' in Taxongo.com)ST - Residential complex service - Completion certificate - Sale of immovable property - Exempt services - As at the time of taking credit, there was no existence of any exempted service, therefore, there is no application of Rule 6 of CCR: HCPost - Sale Discounts: Clarification or Confusion?RBI levies Rs 7 Cr penalty on SBI for not complying with guidelinesGST - An agenda for reforms - Part 46 - Amnesty season - Time to bring Settlement Commission for GST disputesRajasthan HC asks lawyers not to call Judges as My Lord; Addressing SIR is fineIt is fit case for remand if adjudication order passed is cryptic and does not consider relevant parameters while disposing of stay petitions: HCTariff Values of all Edible oils see a dip whereas that of Gold and Silver hiked marginallyCus - As far as relationship has not influenced pricing pattern, there is no justification for inclusion of royalty and technical know-how in AV of imported products: CESTATDefence Industrial Corridors - Consultant hired to prepare Project ReportAdditions can be made on basis of peak credit theory if assessee fails to explain genuineness of transactions: ITATDigital Healthcare to deliver services at doorstep: Dr Harsh VardhanCX - On provisional release, goods were cleared on payment of duty, therefore, order of confiscation is not as per law: CESTATPetro Sector contributed about Rs 6 lakh crore to Central & State Exchequers last yearRevisional power exercised by subordinate officer on behalf of CIT in delegation of power, is not permissible as per Sec 263: ITATST - Assessee is himself operating the power plants and not managing the same for others - maintenance is in the nature of self service, not taxable: CESTATProvision created for post-retirement medical benefit can be held as ascertained liability and is allowable as expenditure: ITATCX - AA is bound to make assessee aware with the materials collected behind their back and to give them adequate opportunity to meet the case of Revenue - Matter remanded: CESTATDespite remand proceedings, if AO fails to place any incriminating materials found during survey operations, no addition for suppression of yield can be made: ITATST - Unjust enrichment is not applicable even when refund amount is claimed as expenses in the P&L Account: CESTATNo penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed merely because claim of deductions are found to be untenable & no act of concealment is recorded: ITATCX - Merely for procedural lapse, substantial benefit of CENVAT credit cannot be denied - credit taken on the strength of first stage dealer invoice even though issued by importer is admissible: CESTATSum held in fiduciary capacity cannot be taxed as income in hands of holder: ITATFailure to reconcile differences in sales figures as reported in books to that of corresponding figures reflected in TDS statement, calls for penalty: ITATIndia's exports in June month logs negative growth of 9.7%Over 9622 acres of defence land stand encroached; UP, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Assam top the tallyCBDT issues AGT order of 122 ACIT / DCIT on All India basisGST - Slabs of Quartz (Artificial stone) is classifiable under HSN 6810 1990 and attracts GST @18%: AARGST - Air-conditioning work for new building carried out by applicant is a Composite Supply; Ch. 8415 @28% GST: AARGST - Healthcare treatment to patients through Ayurveda, Naturopathy, Yoga by appropriate diagnosis and intake of medicines - applicant qualifies as clinical establishment, Nil rate GST: AARGST - Converting bare shaft supplied by customers to 'Sugar Mill Rollers' is supply of goods and not services: AARGST - Offering advisory services is not covered under mandate of Authority - application rejected: AAR
Untitled Document

[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i)]

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
NEW DELHI

NOTIFICATION NO

26/2019-Customs (ADD); Dated: June 24, 2019

Whereas, the Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), hereinafter referred to as the Customs Tariff Act, read with rules 18 and 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination Injury), Rules, 1995, levied anti-dumping duty on imports of 'Paracetamol' (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods) falling under Chapter 29 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, originating in or exported from China PR (hereinafter referred to as the subject country), vide notification No. 26/2013-Customs (ADD), dated the 28th October, 2013, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 710(E), dated the 28th October, 2013 for a period of 5 years from the date of publication in the Official Gazette;

Whereas, the designated authority, vide notification No. 7/16/2018-DGAD, dated the 25th April, 2018, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, initiated a review in the matter of continuation of anti-dumping duty and recommended the extension of the anti-dumping duty on the subject goods for a period of 6 months;

And whereas, on the basis of the recommendations of the designated authority, the Central Government had extended the anti-dumping duty on the subject goods, originating in or exported from the subject country up to and inclusive of the 26th April, 2019 vide notification No.39/2018-Customs (ADD), dated the 20th August, 2018, published in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) of the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R 786(E), dated the 20th August, 2018 amending aforesaid notification No. 26/2013-Customs (ADD), dated the 28th October, 2013;

And whereas, the designated authority in its final findings dated 29th January, 2019, published vide notification No. 7/16/2018-DGAD, dated the 29th January, 2019, in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, regarding the review of anti-dumping duty on the subject goods originating in or exported from the subject country, recommended termination of the anti-dumping duty on the import of subject goods;

And whereas on the basis of these final findings, the Central Government, vide notification No.19/2019-Customs (ADD), dated the 16th April, 2019, published in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) of the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R 309 (E), dated the 16th April, 2019; rescinded the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 39/2018-Customs (ADD), dated the 20th August, 2018 to terminate the levy of anti-dumping duty on the subject goods as per the said final findings of the designated authority;

And whereas the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the matter of SCA No. 5278/2019 vide order dated 24.04.2019, directed to extend the aforesaid notification No. 39/2018-Customs (ADD), dated the 20.8.2018 till 24.6.2019, and on being informed that the said notification No. 39/2018-Customs (ADD), dated 20th August, 2018 had already been rescinded vide notification No. 19/2019-Customs (ADD) dated the 16th April, 2019, the Hon'ble High Court suspended notification No. 19/2019-Customs (ADD) dated the 16th April, 2019, till final disposal of the main petition;

And whereas the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the matter of SCA No. 5278/2019 vide order dated 09.05.2019, again directed that the notification No. 39/2018-Customs (ADD), dated the 20.8.2018 be extended for a further period up to 24.06.2019;

And whereas the Central Government has challenged the aforesaid order vide Special Leave Petition No. 13302-13304/2019 in the Hon'ble Supreme Court;

And whereas the Central Government has extended notification No. 39/2018-Customs (ADD), dated the 20th August 2018 vide notification No. 22/2019-Customs (ADD) dated the 10th June, 2019, in pursuance of order of Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat dated 09.05.2019;

Whereas the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the matter of SCA No. 5278/2019 vide order dated 20.06.2019, again directed that the notification No. 39/2018-Customs (ADD), dated the 20.8.2018 be further extended up to and inclusive of 09th July, 2019;

Now therefore, in exercise of power conferred by sub-sections (1) and (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act read with rules 18 and 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination Injury), Rules, 1995, and in pursuance of the High Court order dated 20.06.2019, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties to be decided in the writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat and the ultimate outcome of the SLP in the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 39/2018 Customs (ADD), dated the 20th August, 2018, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, part II, Section 3, Sub-Section (i), vide number G. S. R. 786 (E), dated 20th August, 2018, namely:-

In the said notification, for the figures, letters and word "24th June, 2019", the figures, letters and word "9th July, 2019" shall be substituted.

[F.No.354/93/2001-TRU (Pt-IV)]

(Ruchi Bisht)
Under Secretary to the Government of India