News Update

5 States get nod for addl borrowing on meeting reform targetsGST - Renting of Immovable Property service - Notional interest on security deposit has to be considered as part of value of supply of service if it influences monthly rent: AARGST - If, at expiry of lease tenure, entire deposit or part of it is withheld and not paid back, as charge against damages etc., then such amounts not refunded will be liable to GST: AARGST - Examination is an incomplete activity without assessment - Scanning of answer sheets and quantifying marks is main objective of examination process - activity of applicant is exempted: AARHarley Davidson to shut down manufacturing & sales offices in IndiaEU resolves to go ahead with digital tax if OECD fails to broker global consensusCOVID-19 & Digital Technologies eat up romance of 'OFFICE' & also sovereignty to levy taxes!Obituary: Shiva Kant Jha passionately fought judicial battles in public interestsCus - Onus rests with the Revenue to establish that valuation of imported goods was incorrect & it is not for the importer to prove otherwise: CESTATCX - Limitation period for filing refund application must strictly be followed - no relief can be allowed if assessee files refund claim after prescribed time period & the same is rejected on limitation: CESTATST - When an amount deposited loses the character of service tax, it can only be treated as a deposit - such amount merits adjustment u/r 6(3) and becomes liable for refund: CESTATLate filing fee u/s 234E cannot be levied where date of filing TDS statement & date of intimation are prior to date of introduction of Section 234E: ITATHigh Speed Rail Corporation opens bids covering 47% of Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridorOnce liability stands converted into share application money with consent of creditors, then same cannot be treated as cessation or remission of liability, either unilateral or bilateral: ITATIn case of unabated assessments, no addition can be framed u/s 153A unless it based on tangible material incriminating the assessee, found in course of search operations: ITATCOVID-19 - PM asks States to increase testing & ensure 100% RT-PCR testsTheory of extrapolation cannot be applied on mere theoretical or hypothetical basis in absence of any incriminating & corroborative evidence or material brought on record by the AO in this regard: ITAT871 formulations of essential medicines covered under price controlStatements of third parties per se do not qualify as incriminating evidence: ITATCus - Notification 5/2019-Cus dt. 16.02.2019 imposing duty of 200% on all goods originating in or exported from Islamic Republic of Pakistan was uploaded on the e-Gazette at 20:46:58 hours - power of re-assessment u/s 17(4) could not have been exercised for self-assessments made earlier in the day - Revenue appeals dismissed: SC LBGST - Bench cannot sit in appeal and postulate that decision of Council is not what they have unwaveringly held it to be: HCGST - Response of Union Minister to query cannot prevail over decision of Council and also cannot form basis for impugning decision of Council or notification notifying tax rate: HCBombay HC stops hearing as it’s pouringStartup ecosystem for rural & tribal entrepreneurs being developed: GovtRajya Sabha adjourned sine die; bids sayonara to 11 retiring Members from UP & Uttarakhand'Lost Decade' if austerity dominates winning policy space: UNCTADCBDT notifies New Form 15C to accommodate Insurer with banking companies for Sec 195(3) certificateThe Interest ConundrumSeizure of Cash made during investigation - Legality under GST?VAT - Assessee cannot be relegated to invoke appellate remedy, where writ remedy is sought in contest of a non-speaking order which suffers from arbitrariness: HCUDAN: Demand-driven Scheme for affordable air travel: PuriExpenses incurred by the company for holding a dealers' conference or towards sales promotion, cannot be considered for determining assessee's liability towards Fringe Benefit Tax u/s 115WB(2)(c): HCIndia not in position to accept Data Free Flow with Trust: GoyalCX - Revenue cannot refuse to accept surrender of assessee-company's registration certificate where no enforceable dues are recoverable from the assessee: HCMonsoon Session may wrap up today; CAG to table 29 reports in HouseAssessment u/s 153A can be resorted to only if any material incriminating the assessee is found during Search operation conducted u/s 132: ITATSales Tax - Tribunal upheld assessment order by considering a remand report only & without hearing the assessee - case remanded for passing fresh order: HCCouncils sets up to help MSMEs in resolving delayed payments: Sarangi
Untitled Document

[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i)]

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
NEW DELHI

NOTIFICATION NO

29/2020-Customs (ADD), Dated: September 02, 2020

Whereas, the designated authority vide initiation notification No. 7/2/2020-DGTR, dated the 10th February, 2020, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, dated the 10th February, 2020, has initiated review in terms of sub-section (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the Customs Tariff Act) and in pursuance of rule 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as the said rules), in the matter of continuation of anti-dumping duty on imports of "Float Glass of thickness 2 mm to 12 mm (both thickness inclusive) of clear as well as tinted variety (other than green glass) but not including reflective glass, processed glass meant for decorative, industrial or automotive purposes" falling under heading 7005 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, originating in or exported from Peoples' Republic of China, imposed vide notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 47/2015-Customs (ADD), dated the 8th September, 2015, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 687 (E), dated the 8th September, 2015, and has requested for extension of the said anti-dumping duty in terms of sub-section (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, read with rules 18 and 23 of the said rules, the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 47/2015-Customs (ADD), dated the 8th September, 2015, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 687(E), dated the 8th September, 2015, namely:-

In the said notification, after paragraph 2, the following paragraph shall be inserted, namely: -

"3. Notwithstanding anything contained in paragraph 2, the anti-dumping duty imposed under this notification shall remain in force up to and inclusive of the 7th December, 2020, unless revoked, superseded or amended earlier.".

[F. No. 354/115/2020-TRU]

(Jainendra Singh Kandhari)
Deputy Secretary to the Government of India

Note: The principal notification No. 47/2015-Customs (ADD), dated the 8th September, 2015 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 687 (E), dated the 8th September, 2015.

[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i)]

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
NEW DELHI

NOTIFICATION NO

28/2020-Customs (ADD), Dated: September 02, 2020

Whereas, in the matter of 'Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride' (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods), falling under tariff item 2941 90 30 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the Customs Tariff Act), originating in or exported from China PR (hereinafter referred to as the subject country) and imported into India, the designated authority vide its preliminary findings No. 6/36/2019- DGTR, dated the 15th June, 2020, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, dated the 15th June, 2020, has provisionally concluded that-

(i) the subject goods have been exported to India from the subject country at dumped prices;

(ii) the domestic industry has suffered material injury;

(iii)the injury to the domestic industry has been caused by the dumped imports;

and has recommended imposition of provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of the subject goods, originating in, or exported from the subject country and imported into India, in order to remove injury to the domestic industry.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act read with rules 13 and 20 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, the Central Government, on the basis of the aforesaid findings of the designated authority, hereby imposes on the subject goods, the description of which is specified in column (3) of the Table below, falling under the tariff item of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act as specified in the corresponding entry in column (2), originating in the countries as specified in the corresponding entry in column (4), exported from the countries as specified in the corresponding entry in column (5), produced by the producers as specified in the corresponding entry in column (6), and imported into India, a provisional anti-dumping duty at the rate equal to the amount as specified in the corresponding entry in column (7), in the currency as specified in the corresponding entry in column (8) and as per unit of measurement as specified in the corresponding entry in column (9) of the said Table, namely:-

Table

S.No.

Tariff item

Description of Goods

Country of Origin

Country of Export

Producer

Duty Amount

Currency

Unit

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

1

29419030

Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride

China PR

Any country including China PR

Shangyu Jingxin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

2.41

USD

Kg

2

29419030

Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride

China PR

Any country including China PR

Zhejiang Langhua Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

0.94

USD

Kg

3

29419030

Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride

China PR

Any country including China PR

Zhejiang Guobang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

1.90

USD

Kg

4

29419030

Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride

China PR

Any country including China PR

Any producer other than serial number 1, 2, and 3

3.29

USD

Kg

5

29419030

Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride

Any country other than China PR

China PR

Any

3.29

USD

Kg

2. The provisional anti-dumping duty imposed under this notification shall be effective for a period of six months (unless revoked, amended or superseded earlier) from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette and shall be payable in Indian currency.

Explanation.- For the purposes of this notification, rate of exchange applicable for the purposes of calculation of such anti-dumping duty shall be the rate which is specified in the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), issued from time to time, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), and the relevant date for the determination of the rate of exchange shall be the date of presentation of the bill of entry under section 46 of the said Customs Act.

[F.No. 354/95/2020 -TRU]

(Gaurav Singh)
Deputy Secretary to the Government of India