News Update

Deficits and fulfilling promises to States - A different viewCus - Procedure for rejection of declared value u/r 12 of CVR is mandatory in nature - the mandate of Rules 4 to 9 must be satisfied sequentially before invoking provisions of Rule 12: CESTATIFSCA Panel submits interim report on international retail businessST - Even if receipts under Club & Association service, earned by a society registered under Societies Registration Act are treatable as its income, no service tax is leviable on such amount: CESTAT46K villages in Bihar to be connected with OFC Internet by Mar 31, 2021Cus - It is a substantive right of the exporter to claim drawback; should not be denied on account of procedural irregularities: CESTATIEA, NITI Aayog launch Report on Sustainable RecoveryPenalty cannot be imposed for alleged breach of one limb of Sec 271(1)(c), if penalty proceedings were initiated for breach of other limb of Sec 271(1)(c): HCAssessment u/s 153A can be resorted to only if any material incriminating the assessee is found during Search operation conducted u/s 132: ITATReopening of assessment - AO cannot make additions in respect of any amount other than that amount for which such proceedings were resorted to: ITATGST - Removal of goods before supply - Time period for issue of invoice extended till Oct 31 + Date extended for GSTR-4 till Oct 31 + Waiver of late fee for GSTR-10 if return filed till Dec 31Cabinet gives nod for uptick in MSPs for all Rabi crops78 new routes identified under Phase 1 of UDAN 4.0CBIC launches single window module for processing of deputation applicationsCBDT notifies scope of faceless assessment with cut-off date of Aug 13Income tax officers compulsorily retired under Rule 56(j) - Representation - Govt constitutes Panel
Untitled Document

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES
(TAX POLICY AND LEGISLATION DIVISION)
NEW DELHI

CIRCULAR NO

16/2020, Dated: August 30, 2020

Subject: Imposition of charge on the prescribed electronic modes under section 269SU of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - reg.

In furtherance to the declared policy objective of the Government to encourage digital transactions and move towards a less-cash economy, the Finance (No. 2) Act 2019 inserted a new provision namely section 269SU in the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the IT Act"), which provides that every person having a business turnover of more than Rs. 50 crores during the immediately preceding previous year shall mandatorily provide facilities for accepting payments through prescribed electronic modes. Further, a new provision namely section 10A was also inserted in the Payment and Settlement Systems Act 2007 ("the PSS Act"), which provides that no Sank or system provider shall impose any charge on a payer making payment, or a beneficiary receiving payment, through electronic modes prescribed under section 269SU of their IT Act. Subsequently vide notification no. 105/2019 dated 30.12.2019 (i) Debit Card powered by RuPay; (ii) Unified Payments Interface (UPI) (SHIM-UPI); and (iii) Unified Payments Interface Quick Response Code (UPI QR Code) (SHIM-UPI QR Code) were notified as prescribed electronic modes under section 269 SU of the IT Act.

2. A circular no. 32/2019 dated 30.12.2019 was issued by the Board to clarify that based on section 10A of the PSS Act, any charge including the MDR (Merchant Discount Rate) shall not be applicable on or after 01st January, 2020 on payment made through prescribed electronic modes. However, representations have been received that some banks are imposing and collecting charges on transactions carried out through UPI. A certain number of transactions are al lowed free of charge beyond which every transaction bears a charge. Such practice on part of banks is a breach of section 10A of the PSS Act as well as section 269SU of the IT Act. Such breach attracts penal provisions under section 271DB of the IT Act as well as section 26 of the PSS Act.

3. Banks are, therefore, advised to immediately refund the charges collected, if any, on or after 1st January, 2020 on transactions carried out using the electronic modes prescribed under section 269SU of the IT Act and not to impose charges on any future transactions carried through the said prescribed modes.

[F.No. 370142/35/2019-TPL-Pt]

(Ankur Goyal)
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India