SIGN IN SUBSCRIBE

News Update

Cus - Adjudication proceedings initiated on the ground of 'illegal export' whereas seizure was on the belief that there is 'illegal import' - Clear lack of jurisdiction: HCCus - An assessee cannot be deprived of its justifiable money - Refund to be granted along with interest @8%, although Act provides interest @6% - Difference of 2% to be recovered from officers responsible and mention be made in their service records - Cost of Rs.1 lakh also payable: HCCus - It is settled law that Tribunal cannot travel beyond the scope of relief and the case made out in the show cause notice: HCCus - RoSCTL Scheme - Right accrued pursuant to any law and/or Scheme in favour of the person cannot be denied merely due to any technical error and/or glitch: HCST - Not only is the assessee a PSU but also if the tax had been paid on reverse charge basis, they would have been entitled to take credit - Net effect is the exercise is revenue neutral - Tribunal rightly set aside the penalty: HCGST - Refund of IGST paid on goods exported - An Assessee cannot be deprived of its justifiable money - Petitioner ought to be compensated for such deprivation - Interest to be paid @6%: HCSC Constitution Bench upholds rights of States to levy royalty on mineral taxGST - DRC-01 was not accompanied by SCN - Order passed - Violation of principles of natural justice - Orders set aside and matter remanded: HCAustralia notifies sanctions against Israel for West Bank violenceGST - When an adverse order is to be passed, the same has to be passed after giving an opportunity of personal hearing and in absence thereof, such order deserves to be quashed: HCMusk says Starlink now working on over 1000 aircraftBudget 2024 plays unfair with property owners; redefines HNIs!Typhoon Gaemi makes landfall in Taiwan; 8 killedBudget 2024: A Comprehensive Perspective on GSTDelhi HC imposes Rs 1 lakh fine for defaming judges on social mediaI-T- When the income of agricultural land is exempt from tax, then said exempt income cannot be added to books profit while calculating the MAT u/s. 115JB : ITATBiden says he exited from race to unite DemocratsI-T- Deduction u/s 80P cannot be denied to a cooperative society, in respect of interest income earned from money invested in cooperative banks: ITATUK, Germany ink defence pact for closer cooperationI-T- Existence of loan account not disputed - waiver of such outstanding loan cannot be clubbed with capital account and deemed unexplained; tax levied u/s 115BBE not tenable: ITATUS cautions tech start-ups on security threats from overseas investorsCus - Appellant is not liable to pay safeguard duty on electrical insulators of glass which is imposed by Notfn 5/2012-Cus as on date of entry inward of import goods, said Notification had not come into force: CESTATMeta erases thousands of Facebook sextortion accounts from NigeriaTaxonomy is not about taxesUNESCO declines to put UK’s Stonehenge on list of heritage sites in dangerBudget for Vikasit BharatIndia successfully tests two ballistic missilesWill the Old Tax Regime be Consigned to A Margadarshak Role?Khalistani activists polluting Canada: Canadian MP Chandra AryaGSTAT to deal with Anti-Profiteering casesUK Foreign Minister David Lammy meets PM ModiRs 1.72 lakh crore allocated for capital acquisition for defence

MESSAGE BOARD

   


Provision - Expense - TDS challan

Dear sir,

Please give your opinion on this.

FY 2012-13 AY 2013-14
A company. An year end provision (Mar 31.2013) was kept for Professional fees as per mercantile system of accounting to get true and fair view of PL. Rs 100/-.
Entry
Professional fee (Expense GL) Dr 100
Outstanding Liability (Liability Balance sheet GL) Cr 100

Expense was duly disallowed for AY 2013-14 under section 40a(i)(a).

FY 2013-14 AY 2014-15
Professional of company produced bill only on Dec 2013 for same Rs 100/-
Entry passed
Outstanding liability (Liability GL) Dr100
Vendor Cr 90
TDS Cr 10

This TDS was paid to Government in next month before due date of 7th jan 2014.
Since TDS ought to be deducted on 31.03.2013, Interest for the period from 31.03.2013 to 07.01.2014 paid over and above Rs 10 TDS.

This TDS challan for Rs 10 is made in AY 2014-15.

Since provision is disallowed in AY 2013-14, and since TDS is paid duly in FY 2013-14, this expense of Rs 100 is claimed in AY 2014-15.

Assessment by assessing officer for AY 2014-15

Assessing officer is not allowing Rs 100 in AY 2014-15, because TDS challan is in AY 2014-15 and not AY 2013-14(i.e. Assessment year of provision booking). Assessing officer is asking to file correction statement of TDS.

How can assessing officer tell like this?

Provision was duly disallowed in AY 2013-14
Double deduction is not claimed.
Bill is given by the professional only in Dec 13.
TDS is paid in Jan 14 and return is duly filed.
Income is booked by Professional in FY 2013-14 (AY 2014-15).
TDS is now correctly matching in the 26AS of that professional.
If correction statement is filed, mismatch will occur in the 26AS of professional.

Question
Is there any provision in the Income tax Act, that TDS challan should have been paid in AY 2013-14 and not AY 2014-15 and then only deduction can be claimed?
Section 40(a) is saying that wherein respect of any such sum, where any tax has been deducted in any subsequent year, such sum shall be allowed as deduction in computing the income of the previous year in which such tax has been paid.

Siva Rama 04/02/2017

 

Back

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube
Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Chairman, TIOL Knowledge Foundation, addressing the gathering

TOP NEWS


AR not Afar by SK Rahman

VISION 360



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.

TII LATEST

TIOLCORPLAWS LATEST