News Update

Erroneous RefundModern Money Maze: Life Insurance or Annuity for Tax Advantage?I-T- Assessment order quashed where passed without considering assessee's request for adjourment seeking additional time to file reply to Show Cause Notice: HCGovt issues alert against incidents of 'Blackmail' by Cyber Criminals impersonating agenciesI-T- Re-assessment invalidated where assessee makes full & true disclosure of material facts necessary for assessment & where AO has no new tangible evidence: HCECI's second suo motu report on two month's enforcement of MCCIndia walls off 1000 Skype IDs used by cyber criminalsI-T - There cannot be any justification for allowing a deduction u/s 37(1) or u/s 28, of write-off of amount paid on encashment of this corporate guarantee: ITATGoogle to provide AI-powered answers in search: PichaiDefence Secy inaugurates midget submarine prototype & solar electric hybrid boat8 farmworkers die in Florida as bus rams into pickup truckI-T-If an expenditure has no connection with exempt income, then such expenditure cannot be disallowed u/s 14A: ITATTesla to lay off 600 more employeesUntimely demise of Sushil Modi; TIOL Knowledge Foundation loses a passionate patronWildfire spreading; reaches Canadian oil town; 6000 evacuatedI-T- Disallowance of payments made under PF & ESI merits being recomputed, where delay in payment is on account of banks being closed on certain national holidays: ITATLula fires Petrobras chief executiveST - In absence of any finding recorded by Commissioner that construction was primarily for purpose of 'commerce or industry', it is not possible to sustain demand under section 65(105)(zzzza) of Finance Act: CESTATPro-Palestine protesters wind up encampment at Harvard UnivCX - Since both the Notifications 22/ 2014 and 24/2014 were not issued for publication in official gazette not offered for sale on said date, appellant is not liable to pay duty as per said Notifications: CESTAT

MESSAGE BOARD

   

CX - Notif. 21/2014-CX(NT) prohibiting manufacturer from taking CENVAT credit after six months from date of issue of invoice does not apply to invoices issued prior to date of notification: CESTAT


Time limit to take cenvat credit

the subject time restriction to take credit is imposed w.e.f 1.9.2014 vide Notfn No. 21/2014-NT dated 11.07.2017 which is prospective in nature as it is applicable in respect of credits taken on or after 1.9.2014. Judgement says that time restriction is applicable only for the invoices issued on or after 11.7.2014 and credit can be taken on the invoices issued prior to 11.7.2014 can be taken without any time limit may not be the intention of the provision. In fact it appears that time gap given from the date of notification (11.7.2014) to effective date (1.9.2014) is to provide opportunity to the trade to avail credit on any missed invoices. Further, not having such condition at the time of issue of invoices is no way deprive of any action on the part of the credit taker. Another reason given for allowing credit is that it is suffice if the credit is taken in the books of records even though the same is not reflected in the Cenvat Credit Register. Unless it is shown in the Cenvat Credit Register and also declared in the periodical returns how it was considered as shown in the books of records. If such an analogy is drawn how to recon the relevant date to issue SCN based on the date of receipt of input/input service shown in any book of record or on the date of taking credit in Cenvat Credit Register/ month of credit shown in the periodical returns.

mallikarjun reddy c 27/03/2018

 

Back

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.