News Update

VAT - If notice for completing assessment issued within limitation, then assessment order is within time even if passed beyond period of three years: HCGST - Cancellation of registration of GST has cascading effect on all other businessman who are receiving the goods from the registered person - Delay in filing appeal is condoned as petitioner has already made pre-deposit: HCGST - Impugned order was not reflecting under the tab 'view notices and orders' - Consequently, petitioner being unaware of the same could not contest validity within limitation period - Order set aside: HCGST - Respondents are well within their rights to levy GST on the royalty paid by the mineral concession holder for any mining concession granted by the State: HCDRI canon - Sleuths in SnagACC appoints two new Members for CBICJharkhand Assembly polls – voting underway for 43 seatsIndia-Russia discuss cooperation in Pulses tradeMHA tells House Panel that only 38 civilians lost their lives in North-East in 2023; skips mention of ManipurBoost for Make in India - Integrated Manufacturing Cluster coming up at GayaBangladesh seeks help for Interpol for arresting ousted PM HasinaNFRA recomments revising SCQ1, SQM1 & SQM2 standardsElon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy to run new Department of Government Efficiency in USAPFRDA invites bid for System Integrator for PFRDA Connect websiteTaliban appoints Ikramuddin Kamil as Acting Consul at MumbaiWith 11% growth, PSBs perform well in 1st half of FY 2024-25CBIC notifies Customs Tariff rates for Gold, Silver and crude oilCBDT notifies PNG Regulatory Board under Section 10(46A)(a) of I-T ActCBIC notifies ICD at Jajpur, OdishaI-T - Non-addition of any income on account of same being interest commensurate with TDS deposits, or making further enquiries would not confer PCIT with jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 : HCI-T - If there is settlement arrived at between members of Hindu undivided family, then cost with reference to acquisition of property would have to be assessed as per Sec 49(1)(i): HCI-T - Joint venture undertaking which was awarded a contract for full-fledged development of Airport, can be said to be 'developer' eligible for deduction u/s 80-IA(4): HCI-T - If tax is deductible at source, then assessee shall not be called upon to pay tax himself to extent to which tax has been deducted from that income: HCI-T - Revenue authorities are not justified in continuing retention of books of accounts and other documents contrary to provision of Sec 132(8): HCI-T- Power of revision is unwarrantedly exercised where it is based on incorrect assumption of facts: ITATST - Software imported and sold by the Appellant is import and sale of goods and is not exigible to service tax: CESTATST - Once Appellant had paid VAT on the sale of goods, service tax cannot be demanded on such sale of goods: CESTATST - Burden of proving that assessee suppressed facts with intent to evade payment of Service Tax is clearly upon the Department; is necessary for the Department to illustrate any positive act of suppression on assessee's part: CESTATCus - Where imported motor vehicle is registered & certified for compliance with Central Motor Vehicle Rules , then separate EC Type Approval Certificate under Import Licensing Note to Chapter 87 of Customs Tariff Act 1985, is not needed: CESTATCus - Substantial benefit of tax exemption cannot be denied based on procedural lapse alone; confiscation of imported vehicle is not tenable where no mis-declaration of description or classification or quantity, is involved: CESTAT

MESSAGE BOARD

   


Finance Act 2014 - amendments in Appeals pre-deposit provisions

Finance Act 2014 has introduced a new section, Section 35F to Central Excise Act 1994, to prescribe a mandatory fixed pre-deposit in case of Appeals which is as follows:
(I) For filing appeal before the Commissioner (Appeal) or the Tribunal at the first stage, pre-deposit will be
a) 7.5% of the duty demanded if only duty is involved
b) 7.5% of the duty demanded if both duty and penalty is imposed
c) 7.5% of the penalty if only penalty is imposed
(II) For filing second stage appeal before the Tribunal, pre-deposit will be:
a)10% of the duty demanded if only duty is imposed
b) 10% of the duty demanded if both duty and penalty is imposed
c) 10% of the penalty if only penalty is imposed
Further, the amount of pre-deposit payable would be subject to a ceiling of Rs.10 crore. All pending appeals/stay applications would be governed by the statutory provisions prevailing at the time of filing such stay applications/appeals. These new provisions would, mutatis mutandis, apply to Service Tax.

Now following points may lead to further disputes/litigations if not explicitly clarified:

i) While filing IInd stage appeal, what will happen to the Ist stage deposit made? Whether that deposit (7.5% of Duty or Duty+Penalty or Penalty as the case may be) made can be appropriated against the dues which may not be legally correct as such appropriation for which there is no provisions under the Central Excise Act, 1944, will be amounting to initiating recovery proceedings during appealable period.
ii) If the pre deposit of 7.5% mentioned in ( i ) above is appropriated, whether the 10% of Duty, Penalty to be deposited in IInd stage would be reduced to the extent of the pre deposit made at the time of Ist stage appeal or are the appellants at IInd stage required to pay the full amount of duty or duty+Penalty or Penalty as the case may be?

Hari Narayanan 14/08/2014

 

Back

TIOL Tube Latest

Conferment of TIOL Awards 2024. The event was held on October 1, 2024 at Taj Palace, New Delhi



Technical Session I - Ease of Doing Business: GST on Digital Economy