News Update

PLI scheme for electronics manufacturing sees incremental investment of Rs 8,390 CrG20 finance leaders agree to tax super-rich but forum not yet readyDPIIT promotes green logistics industry balancing economic growth and environmentIndia, US ink pact to stymie illegal trafficking of cultural propertyRailways expands tracks by 31,180 kmFroth in Yamuna river: Delhi complains to Centre against UP and HaryanaGovt to enhance reach of Indian Digital Public InfrastructureFormer BJP Minister says BJP has totally failed as Opposition in KarnatakaGovt provides incentives to small tea growersEU penalises 5 countries for infringing budget rulesI-T-Transaction involving transfer of unutilised shares cannot be deemed to be sale of shares so as to attract levy of Long Term Capital Gain u/s 112: ITATChina says Relations with Japan at critical stageST - Once the activity of appellant that is of forfeituring the amount of earnest money is not a declared service, question of retaining said money as consideration for rendering such service becomes absolutely redundant: CESTATEU medicines regulator disapproves Alzheimer’s new drugSC says no restrictions on voluntary name banners along Kanwar route eateriesFM favours debt reduction but sans affecting economic growthKargil Victory Day: PM warns Pak against practising terrorismChina pumps in subsidies worth USD 41 bn into car sectorMisc - Payments made to Government cannot be deemed to be a tax merely because statute provides for their recovery as arrears: SC CBMisc - Royalty not a tax; royalty is contractual consideration paid by mining lessee to lessor for enjoyment of mineral rights & liability to pay royalty arises out of contractual conditions of mining lease: SC CBMisc - Since power to tax mineral rights is provided for in Entry 50 of List II, Parliament cannot use its residuary powers in this subject matter: SC CBCus - Owner of goods has a liability to pay customs duty even after confiscated goods are redeemed on payment of fine - Interest follows: SC

MESSAGE BOARD

   

Income Tax - Deduction - Excise Duty paid under protest - ITAT allows


ADVANCE AMOUNT PAID UNDER PLA IS NOT A DEDUCTION OTHERWISE ALLOWABLE HENCE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 43B NOT APPLICABLE


The provisions of section 43B provides :
“Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act, a deduction otherwise allowable under this Act in respect of—
(a) any sum payable by the assessee by way of tax, duty, cess or fee, by whatever name called, under any law for the time being in force, or
…………..
………………
shall be allowed (irrespective of the previous year in which the liability to pay such sum was incurred by the assessee according to the method of accounting regularly employed by him) only in computing the income referred to in section 28 of that previous year in which such sum is actually paid by him.”
….” (emphasis supplied)

Under the Central Excise Act, no legal obligation is cast on the assessee to maintain any minimum amount, which should necessarily remain as balance in the credit of PLA. The only requirement of the Act is that excise duty shall be paid before removal of the goods. Further, after introduction of monthly payment system maintenance of PLA is redundant except for the month of March, where duty is to be paid by 31st March. In view of this, advance payment made under PLA cannot be said to be a liability incurred and hence a deduction allowable under the Act. Therefore provisions of section 43B cannot be invoked at all. Such advance payment under PLA is admissible as deduction in the year of adjustment made against liability to pay duty since the said duty is deemed to have been paid in the year of adjustment.
The provisions of section 43B are in the nature of restricting provisions for allowable deduction and not allowing provisions for inadmissible deduction. If the interpretation of the Tribunal in 2015-TIOL-1346-ITAT-DEL is followed, it may enable an assesse to either avoid of defer payment of income tax by making more advance payment under PLA for a particular year, which is not only against principles of matching but also not the intention of legislation.

V. G. IRKAL
Hospet



vasantirkal vasantirkal 28/08/2015

 

Back

TIOL Tube Latest

Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Chairman, TIOL Knowledge Foundation, addressing the gathering



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.