News Update

PLI scheme for electronics manufacturing sees incremental investment of Rs 8,390 CrG20 finance leaders agree to tax super-rich but forum not yet readyDPIIT promotes green logistics industry balancing economic growth and environmentIndia, US ink pact to stymie illegal trafficking of cultural propertyRailways expands tracks by 31,180 kmFroth in Yamuna river: Delhi complains to Centre against UP and HaryanaGovt to enhance reach of Indian Digital Public InfrastructureFormer BJP Minister says BJP has totally failed as Opposition in KarnatakaGovt provides incentives to small tea growersEU penalises 5 countries for infringing budget rulesI-T-Transaction involving transfer of unutilised shares cannot be deemed to be sale of shares so as to attract levy of Long Term Capital Gain u/s 112: ITATChina says Relations with Japan at critical stageST - Once the activity of appellant that is of forfeituring the amount of earnest money is not a declared service, question of retaining said money as consideration for rendering such service becomes absolutely redundant: CESTATEU medicines regulator disapproves Alzheimer’s new drugSC says no restrictions on voluntary name banners along Kanwar route eateriesFM favours debt reduction but sans affecting economic growthKargil Victory Day: PM warns Pak against practising terrorismChina pumps in subsidies worth USD 41 bn into car sectorMisc - Payments made to Government cannot be deemed to be a tax merely because statute provides for their recovery as arrears: SC CBMisc - Royalty not a tax; royalty is contractual consideration paid by mining lessee to lessor for enjoyment of mineral rights & liability to pay royalty arises out of contractual conditions of mining lease: SC CBMisc - Since power to tax mineral rights is provided for in Entry 50 of List II, Parliament cannot use its residuary powers in this subject matter: SC CBCus - Owner of goods has a liability to pay customs duty even after confiscated goods are redeemed on payment of fine - Interest follows: SC

MESSAGE BOARD

   

Perception of Trade of CBEC:


Free Home Delivery of Food - No Service Tax - Deputy Commissioner Withdraws Clarification

Dear Sir,

Apparently looking to the trail, It seems that the DC/Adl C had issued clarification in good faith, but further clarification form higher authority would have been "Hierarchical ego" problem. why CBEC to clarify the matter of DC? rather, shortcut would be withdrawal by DC himself.

this is nothing but general Phenomenon.

Why they are not so bold to accept the initiative taken by DC to clarify something? why they are not close it down by counter clarification?

it is fact that there no are such officers who tries to clarify any quetions from the industry? I don't remember any trade notice or clarification comming from any authorities now a days. The trade notice, circular section of any jurisdictional tax sites shows only old very old trade notices only.

looking to such compulling of withdrawing the circular, which officer will even try to clarify any matter further more? can we expect any clarification anymore?

Once on my mistake my boss commented that "don't mind, the person who works makes error, but not who does not work"

There should have been Persuasive counter clarification so that no other officers think that let CBEC clarify in each and every trivinal matters also.

Regards.

Chauhan Anand N

Anand Chauhan 22/09/2015

 

Back

TIOL Tube Latest

Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Chairman, TIOL Knowledge Foundation, addressing the gathering



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.