News Update

PLI scheme for electronics manufacturing sees incremental investment of Rs 8,390 CrG20 finance leaders agree to tax super-rich but forum not yet readyDPIIT promotes green logistics industry balancing economic growth and environmentIndia, US ink pact to stymie illegal trafficking of cultural propertyRailways expands tracks by 31,180 kmFroth in Yamuna river: Delhi complains to Centre against UP and HaryanaGovt to enhance reach of Indian Digital Public InfrastructureFormer BJP Minister says BJP has totally failed as Opposition in KarnatakaGovt provides incentives to small tea growersEU penalises 5 countries for infringing budget rulesI-T-Transaction involving transfer of unutilised shares cannot be deemed to be sale of shares so as to attract levy of Long Term Capital Gain u/s 112: ITATChina says Relations with Japan at critical stageST - Once the activity of appellant that is of forfeituring the amount of earnest money is not a declared service, question of retaining said money as consideration for rendering such service becomes absolutely redundant: CESTATEU medicines regulator disapproves Alzheimer’s new drugSC says no restrictions on voluntary name banners along Kanwar route eateriesFM favours debt reduction but sans affecting economic growthKargil Victory Day: PM warns Pak against practising terrorismChina pumps in subsidies worth USD 41 bn into car sectorMisc - Payments made to Government cannot be deemed to be a tax merely because statute provides for their recovery as arrears: SC CBMisc - Royalty not a tax; royalty is contractual consideration paid by mining lessee to lessor for enjoyment of mineral rights & liability to pay royalty arises out of contractual conditions of mining lease: SC CBMisc - Since power to tax mineral rights is provided for in Entry 50 of List II, Parliament cannot use its residuary powers in this subject matter: SC CBCus - Owner of goods has a liability to pay customs duty even after confiscated goods are redeemed on payment of fine - Interest follows: SC

MESSAGE BOARD

   

Instruction on amended penalty provisions-other side of coin!


tax ascertained by the central excise officer under 73

The clarification has been well analysed by the authors.Strangely the clarification on the provisions of 73.3 where the tax is ascertained by a CEx officer mentioned therein is not clarified.The deletion of 73.4A from 14/5/2015 and changes in penal provisions make this clause crucial.The specific illustrative examples where the CEx officer ascertain the tax to fall under 73(3)must be issued by CBEC.In a case audit team visit and tell that the tax is to be paid on some omitted value,or service etc OR where details are called for from Range dvn Hqrs and the assessee readily furnish same and on being pointed out readily pay the tax OR on scrutiny of ST3 is short payment is pointed out etc this penal clause of 76 only would be applicable.Moreover as per Expln 2 under 73(3),already paid tax with interest before issue of SCN has to be excluded for imposing penalty.Some more clarity is urgently called for in these instances.Now in all cases the 15% penalty is being mandatorily demanded orally by audit range etc.if they point out the omission.This can never be the IDEAL situation.

Unnikrishnan V 28/09/2015

 

Back

TIOL Tube Latest

Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Chairman, TIOL Knowledge Foundation, addressing the gathering



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.