News Update

PLI scheme for electronics manufacturing sees incremental investment of Rs 8,390 CrG20 finance leaders agree to tax super-rich but forum not yet readyDPIIT promotes green logistics industry balancing economic growth and environmentIndia, US ink pact to stymie illegal trafficking of cultural propertyRailways expands tracks by 31,180 kmFroth in Yamuna river: Delhi complains to Centre against UP and HaryanaGovt to enhance reach of Indian Digital Public InfrastructureFormer BJP Minister says BJP has totally failed as Opposition in KarnatakaGovt provides incentives to small tea growersEU penalises 5 countries for infringing budget rulesI-T-Transaction involving transfer of unutilised shares cannot be deemed to be sale of shares so as to attract levy of Long Term Capital Gain u/s 112: ITATChina says Relations with Japan at critical stageST - Once the activity of appellant that is of forfeituring the amount of earnest money is not a declared service, question of retaining said money as consideration for rendering such service becomes absolutely redundant: CESTATEU medicines regulator disapproves Alzheimer’s new drugSC says no restrictions on voluntary name banners along Kanwar route eateriesFM favours debt reduction but sans affecting economic growthKargil Victory Day: PM warns Pak against practising terrorismChina pumps in subsidies worth USD 41 bn into car sectorMisc - Payments made to Government cannot be deemed to be a tax merely because statute provides for their recovery as arrears: SC CBMisc - Royalty not a tax; royalty is contractual consideration paid by mining lessee to lessor for enjoyment of mineral rights & liability to pay royalty arises out of contractual conditions of mining lease: SC CBMisc - Since power to tax mineral rights is provided for in Entry 50 of List II, Parliament cannot use its residuary powers in this subject matter: SC CBCus - Owner of goods has a liability to pay customs duty even after confiscated goods are redeemed on payment of fine - Interest follows: SC

MESSAGE BOARD

   

VAT - There is difference between exempted goods, i.e., goods on which no Value Added Tax is payable and are, therefore, not taxable and other cases where particular transaction, when it satisfies specific condition, is not taxable - Input Tax Credit correctly allowed : SC


good decison

It can be seen that in case of exemption to goods iteself, all subsequent sales being exempted tax cost in the form of itc reversal would be same with all the manufacturer.

Howeever, in case of exemption to particular transaction, if itc reversal is there(as proposed by department)tax cost in the form of itc recersal will be there say Rs. X, and all subsequent sales being taxable, eventhough credit of previous input is available the initial ITC reversal would amount to cost at each stage, whereas if same product if purchased from the manufacturer whoes transaction is not exempted then there being no ITC reversal the tax cost would be NIL against that of Rs. X if purchased from exempted manufacturer. This would make the exempted transaction costly by Rs. X.

This would not be there if ITC reversal is not there(As done by Honourable SC).

So, in case of exempted Goods, cost of all manufacturer would be same, because all manufacturers are required to revers ITC, in same line in case of exempted transaction, when ITC is not reversed, Tax cost of all the manufacturer would be same. Only then exemption to goods and Exemption to Transactions would be on same footing.

Regards.

Anand Chauhan 25/11/2015

 

Back

TIOL Tube Latest

Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Chairman, TIOL Knowledge Foundation, addressing the gathering



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.