News Update

PLI scheme for electronics manufacturing sees incremental investment of Rs 8,390 CrG20 finance leaders agree to tax super-rich but forum not yet readyDPIIT promotes green logistics industry balancing economic growth and environmentIndia, US ink pact to stymie illegal trafficking of cultural propertyRailways expands tracks by 31,180 kmFroth in Yamuna river: Delhi complains to Centre against UP and HaryanaGovt to enhance reach of Indian Digital Public InfrastructureFormer BJP Minister says BJP has totally failed as Opposition in KarnatakaGovt provides incentives to small tea growersEU penalises 5 countries for infringing budget rulesI-T-Transaction involving transfer of unutilised shares cannot be deemed to be sale of shares so as to attract levy of Long Term Capital Gain u/s 112: ITATChina says Relations with Japan at critical stageST - Once the activity of appellant that is of forfeituring the amount of earnest money is not a declared service, question of retaining said money as consideration for rendering such service becomes absolutely redundant: CESTATEU medicines regulator disapproves Alzheimer’s new drugSC says no restrictions on voluntary name banners along Kanwar route eateriesFM favours debt reduction but sans affecting economic growthKargil Victory Day: PM warns Pak against practising terrorismChina pumps in subsidies worth USD 41 bn into car sectorMisc - Payments made to Government cannot be deemed to be a tax merely because statute provides for their recovery as arrears: SC CBMisc - Royalty not a tax; royalty is contractual consideration paid by mining lessee to lessor for enjoyment of mineral rights & liability to pay royalty arises out of contractual conditions of mining lease: SC CBMisc - Since power to tax mineral rights is provided for in Entry 50 of List II, Parliament cannot use its residuary powers in this subject matter: SC CBCus - Owner of goods has a liability to pay customs duty even after confiscated goods are redeemed on payment of fine - Interest follows: SC

MESSAGE BOARD

   

How safe are public deposits with press baron Ramoji Rao, HUF? Will MoF or RBI answer this question, please?


Mr K L Narasimhan vs Mr Ramoji Rao

I have no expertise to comment on the subject. neither i am a part of that 2200 crore investor base. notwithstanding the author's great concern for the public, certain observations of the author appears to subtly manifest a war between the author and mr.ramoji rao. i am also not able to discount the faith of so much of investors who have invested such a mammoth 2200 crores in his HUF.Years back, we all witnessed a great scam on the investment companies and millions were defrauded. after that most of us have become sane enough to plan our investment resources. even after that if mr. ramoji rao could garner and keep such a bounty means it is a testimony, at least to me, of sheer public confidence in him.

true, it is our responsibility to bring out facts to the public but,in no way, it shall create an unnecessary turbulence and cause irrepairable damage to the public faith or confidence.

i also request TIOL to send this piece to the house of ramoji rao and ask for thier comments and clarifications, if any.

jk

jaikumar seetharaman 13/11/2006

 
Re :Mr K L Narasimhan vs Mr Ramoji Rao

And Mr. Jai kumar, you have made a valid observation again. It is very easy for panic to set into the investor base. The damage could easily be caused but the repair work would take ages and probably many a lives. About the legality of such issues, less said the better, less bothered the best.

Venu nair 13/11/2006

 

Back

TIOL Tube Latest

Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Chairman, TIOL Knowledge Foundation, addressing the gathering



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.