News Update

400 delegates from 35 countries likely for International Cotton Advisory Committee meetingI-T - Since communication of notice is complete when it is received by person to whom it is addressed to, merely posting of date of hearing of Miscellaneous Petition in Cause List is not sufficient: HCIndia's Bioeconomy recorded 12 times increase in last 10 years: MoSGovt prepares 18 bills for Winter SessionI-T - If after issuing notice u/s 148, AO accept contention of assessee that income which initially formed reason to believe of escaped assessment, did not actually escaped, it is not open to him independently assess other income: HCGovt tells SC - States extended tenure of Chief Secretaries 57 times in last 10 yrsLabour Force Participation Rate rises to 49.3%: SurveySeasoned diplomat Henry Kissinger passes away at 100I-T - Since absence of notice u/s 143(2) impregnates proceedings with jurisdictional defect, hence it renders notice by Revenue Dept. at assessee's wrong address as improperly served, invalid: HCUS economy rises by 5.2% in Q3I-T - Income computed in accordance with notified accounting standards should not be rejected: HCUS military aircraft dives into sea off Japan; one deadCus - Allegations of contravention of Customs Broker Licensing Regulations 2018 - Proceedings against Broker delayed by over 22 Months - Settled precedent mandates adherence to timelimes prescribed in the Regulations - Proceedings against Broker dropped, since not completed within specified timeline: CESTATTrudeau asks India to take Canadian allegations seriouslyST - As per settled precedent, no Service Tax is to be levied on reimbursement of electricity & water charges: CESTAT13 killed in bus-train collision in TanzaniaCX - Cenvat Credit cannot be denied merely on ground that supplier was not required to pay Excise duty: CESTAT

MESSAGE BOARD

   

How safe are public deposits with press baron Ramoji Rao, HUF? Will MoF or RBI answer this question, please?


Mr K L Narasimhan vs Mr Ramoji Rao

I have no expertise to comment on the subject. neither i am a part of that 2200 crore investor base. notwithstanding the author's great concern for the public, certain observations of the author appears to subtly manifest a war between the author and mr.ramoji rao. i am also not able to discount the faith of so much of investors who have invested such a mammoth 2200 crores in his HUF.Years back, we all witnessed a great scam on the investment companies and millions were defrauded. after that most of us have become sane enough to plan our investment resources. even after that if mr. ramoji rao could garner and keep such a bounty means it is a testimony, at least to me, of sheer public confidence in him.

true, it is our responsibility to bring out facts to the public but,in no way, it shall create an unnecessary turbulence and cause irrepairable damage to the public faith or confidence.

i also request TIOL to send this piece to the house of ramoji rao and ask for thier comments and clarifications, if any.

jk

jaikumar seetharaman 13/11/2006

 
Re :Mr K L Narasimhan vs Mr Ramoji Rao

And Mr. Jai kumar, you have made a valid observation again. It is very easy for panic to set into the investor base. The damage could easily be caused but the repair work would take ages and probably many a lives. About the legality of such issues, less said the better, less bothered the best.

Venu nair 13/11/2006

 

Back

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tax Congress 2023 - Technical Session on 'Taxation of New Age Digital Industry'





Technical Session 5 of TIOL Tax Congress 2023: GST – Second-Generation Reforms, including Technology.




TIOL Tube brings you an interview with former US Secretary of Treasury, Mr. Larry Summers who was recently in Delhi.