2019-TIOL-NEWS-201| Monday August 26, 2019

Dear Member,

Sending following links.

Warm Regards,
TIOL Content Team


TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED.

For assistance please call us at + 91 850 600 0282 or email us at helpdesk@tiol.in.
TIOL Mail Update
TIOL TUBE VIDEO
  TIOLTube.com
 
 
 Legal Wrangle | Direct Tax | Episode 111
 
DIRECT TAX
2019-TIOL-1915-HC-MUM-IT

CIT Vs Manekji Mota Charitable Trust

Whether where 71% of the receipts of a trust are being used in furtherance of its stated objectives, the same is sufficient to infer that such trust exists - YES: HC

Whether a partial expense not authorized by the trust is not grounds enough to deny registration & a suitable alternative would be to curtail benefit u/s 11 to such extent - YES: HC

- Revenue's appeal dismissed: BOMBAY HIGH COURT

2019-TIOL-1914-HC-MUM-IT

Menck Gmbh Vs ACIT

Whether it is settled law that re-assessment proceedings are intrinsically conducted for the benefit of the Revenue & so such proceedings can be dropped even if the assessee does not challenge them in the first place - YES: HC

- Assessee's writ petition dismissed: BOMBAY HIGH COURT

2019-TIOL-1913-HC-ALL-IT

Meerut Roller Flour Mills Pvt Ltd Vs CIT

Whether without bringing on record that assessment order passed after scrutiny is erroneous for being passed without application of mind or incorrect application of law, the CIT cannot invoke its powers u/s 263 - YES: HC

Whether partial rejection of assessee's documentary evidence with respect to unsecured loans by the CIT which was accepted by the AO during the scrutiny assessment will justify exercise the powers u/s 263 - YES: HC

- Assessee's appeal allowed: ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

2019-TIOL-1912-HC-ALL-IT

Sajid Khan Vs PR CIT

Whether without proving the trail of money found to have been received, the onus of the assessee to prove the genuineness of transaction and creditworthiness of the creditor to repel the notion of unexplained investment is not discharged - YES: HC

- Assessee's appeals dimissed: ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

2019-TIOL-1911-HC-AHM-IT

Shivram Ramchandbhai Patel Vs ITO

Whether in absence of valid controversion with the factual findings of the Revenue forums, no substantial questions of law emerges against the additions - YES: HC

- Assessee's appeal dismissed: GUJARAT HIGH COURT

2019-TIOL-1910-HC-PATNA-IT

Ravindra Kumar HUF Vs CIT

Whether non-production of material in support of agricultural income in response to the notice u/s 133(6) after passing of original assessment order could lead to formation of belief justifying re-opening u/s 147 - NO: HC

Whether re-assessment u/s 147 cannot be carried out to conduct a roving enquiry afterwards where the AO during the original assessment of return filed u/s 139 omits to challenge the submissions of the assessee through other available provisions of the Income Tax Act - YES: HC

- Assessee's writ petition allowed: PATNA HIGH COURT

2019-TIOL-1909-HC-PATNA-IT

St Michaels Educational Association Vs CIT

Whether registration of an Educational Society cannot be cancelled if the CIT omits to record to its satisfaction that the activities of institution are not in accordance with its objective - YES: HC

Whether registration of charitable institution is subject to cancellation u/s 12AA(3) by the CIT on the foundation that its activities are aimed solely for the benefit of Christian community - NO: HC

- Assessee's appeal allowed: PATNA HIGH COURT

 
MISC CASE

2019-TIOL-1916-HC-MUM-VAT

Blue Star Ltd Vs CST

Whether order passed by the authority concerned needs to be set aside, if such order is non-reasoned - YES: HC

- Case Remanded: BOMBAY HIGH COURT

 
INDIRECT TAX

SERVICE TAX

2019-TIOL-2411-CESTAT-KOL

CCE & ST Vs Yakthung Manpower And Security Services

ST - The Miscellaneous application has been filed by Revenue for withdrawal of their appeal - The amount involved is below the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakhs which has been notified vide instruction being F. No. 390/Misc./116/2017-JC - The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn: CESTAT

- Appeal dismissed: KOLKATA CESTAT

2019-TIOL-2410-CESTAT-MUM

Gol Offshore Ltd Vs CST

ST - The Revenue brought to notice that the Bombay High Court in the Company Petition passed an order dated 04.12.2017 where under Official Liquidator has been appointed for the winding up proceedings - The Revenue further submits that even though the liquidation proceedings commenced by order dt.04.12.2017, however, no steps have been taken by assessee in accordance with Rule 22 of CESTAT Rules, 1982 - Therefore, the appeal is abated: CESTAT

- Appeal abated: MUMBAI CESTAT

2019-TIOL-2409-CESTAT-AHM

Edelweiss Financial Advisors Ltd Vs CST

ST - The issue involved is that whether the NSE/BSE charges and SEBI turnover fees collected being a stock broker from their clients which is reimbursement of their payment made to NSE/BSE is to be included in the value of stock broker services - The issue has been settled by various judgments including the judgment of this bench in the case of Span Caplease Pvt. Ltd. according to which the statutory payment made by the stock broker and taking reimbursement from their client is not subject to levy of Service Tax - Considering the aforesaid decision of Tribunal, the impugned order is set aside: CESTAT

- Appeal allowed: AHMEDABAD CESTAT

 

 

CENTRAL EXCISE

2019-TIOL-2408-CESTAT-DEL

Pawan Jeet Singh Vs CCE & ST

CX - M/s Kamal Spong & Steel Power Ltd. were engaged in manufacture of MS ingots, MS runner and riser TMT bars Mill Rolls - Their factory was visited by officers of anti-evasion branch, who conducted various searches and verifications, as a result there was shortages of certain final materials as also of the raw-materials - During further investigations, computer generated as also written papers were recovered which according to Revenue revealed clandestine removals during months of April, 2011, May and June, 2011 - Statements of various persons were recorded which accepted the charts prepared by the officers indicating the clandestine activities - Detailed references to all these statements are not being made as it is seen that ultimately the revenue’s case is based upon the consumption of electricity read with the said loose documents and computer printouts - Based upon the same, proceedings were initiated along with another proceedings in respect of same assessee alleging clandestine removal of proposing confirmation of the same - It is seen that the identical proceedings initiated in respect of same assessees resulting in confirmation of demands of more than Rs. 10 crores were considered by Tribunal and vide its Final Order dated 22/01/2019, the entire evidence produced by Revenue was considered and appreciated and the Tribunal came to the conclusion that allegations of clandestine removal, primarily based upon the consumption of electricity read with the statements and the computer printouts, are not proved and accordingly the order was set aside - Inasmuch as the present impugned order is also a part of the same set of investigations, same evidences and identical proceedings - By following the said referred decision of Tribunal the impugned order is set aside: CESTAT

- Appeals allowed: DELHI CESTAT

2019-TIOL-2407-CESTAT-BANG

Shri Prabhulingeshwar Sugars And Chemicals Ltd Vs CCT & CE

CX - Assessee is engaged in manufacture and clearance of sugar and molasses on payment of Central Excise duty and availing CENVAT credit under CCR, 2004 - They are also engaged in manufacture of electricity, which is used captively for manufacture of excisable goods and the excess/surplus quantity of electricity is sold to outside power supply agencies for a consideration without payment of duty, as no rate of duty has been prescribed in CETA, 1985 - The assessee was issued with SCN to demand an amount equal to 6% on the amount of Rs.14,83,155/- being the value of electricity sold to outside agencies i.e. power distribution companies during period March 2015 under Rule 6 of CCR, 2004 - The issue involved is no more res integra and has been settled by decision of Allahabad High Court in case of Gularia Chini Mills which has been approved by Supreme Court in case of M/s. DSCL Sugar Ltd. - Further, the Division Bench of Tribunal in case of Jakarya Sugars Ltd. has also considered the same issue and after relying upon the judgment of Allahabad High Court in case of Gularia Chini Mills has held that in the generation of electricity from bagasse, no other input or input service is used and therefore, the electrical energy is neither excisable under Section 2(d) of CEA, 1944 nor exempted goods and hence, Rule 6 is not applicable - By following the ratios of said decisions, the demand of 6% of value of electricity sold to various companies is not sustainable in law: CESTAT

- Appeal allowed: BANGALORE CESTAT

 

 

 

CUSTOMS

2019-TIOL-2406-CESTAT-DEL

SPL Technologies Pvt Ltd Vs PR CC

Cus - M/s. SPL Technologies Private Limited was in the business of importing and trading of parts and components of Laser Land Leveller - The importer filled Bill of Entry through their CHA to seek clearance of goods declared as AG 401 Laser Level Transmitter with battery pack and charger at a total declared assessable value - The goods were classified under CTH 84328090 and the benefit of Notfn 12/2012-Customs was availed - A SCN was served upon assessee proposing recovery of customs duty - Being the concession/exemption wrongly availed and thus being a short paid duty for a period w.e.f. 01.11.2011 to 31.03.2016 - Admittedly, the assessee is importing different parts in a kit form/disassembled condition for which mere cable connection is required for said kit to constitute one single machine called as laser levelling machines - Those parts need simple cabling at the site, to be levelled, to function as a complete machine of laser land leveller - The said activity of cabling is already held to not to be called as manufacture - Those observations take the impugned imported products out of the ambit of serial No. 399(B) of Notfn 12/2012 - The allegation that these parts are not always in the term of kit are also not opined to be sustainable as is apparent from the invoices - The extra parts imported are for previously so imported machines, in addition to complete kit - There seems no reason to repeat the contention of assessee that along with the kit the extra parts were imported for the other machines which were already in use - Department has wrongly held the articles imported to be the articles falling under either Chapter 9015 instead of Chapter 8432 and under Serial No. 399(B) of Notfn 12/2012 by forming a rigid opinion about the products imported to merely be the parts and components of the impugned agricultural machines - The findings are therefore set aside, also for the reason that the Department has failed to discharge its onus to prove the activity of assessee as manufacture while putting the imported parts/components into the agricultural machine called laser land leveller - It is very much apparent from the statement of Director recorded on 10.07.2015 that since they were using the parts and components hence were under bonafide impression to classify them under Chapter 90153 but after the Notification and exemption thereof came to their notice, and that they are not registered with Central Excise for manufacture, that they rightly classified their product under CTH 8432 - There is no fault in the classification arrived at by the importer - Thus, the bonafide as pleaded is hereby accepted - Otherwise also, there is no positive evidence by the Department to prove any malafide intent of the assessee while claiming the impugned concession that the same has been done with an intent to evade the duty: CESTAT

- Appeals allowed: DELHI CESTAT

2019-TIOL-2405-CESTAT-KOL

CC Vs Taj Textiles

Cus - Revenue has filed Miscellaneous Applications for withdrawal of their appeals - Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn: CESTAT

- Appeals dismissed: KOLKATA CESTAT

 

 

 

Download on the App Store
Get it on Google play

 

 


NEWS FLASH

Prime Minister to launch 'Fit India' drive on Aug 29

CPWD DG selected for Eminent Engineer Award for 2019

P V Sindhu, first Indian shuttler, to win World Championships gold

CBIC DG Systems obtains ISO 27001 and ISO 22301 Certification

 
GUEST COLUMN

Does ' Sabka Vishwas Scheme' provide solution to Sabka problems?

By R Sai Prashanth & V Baratwaj

WITH the Goods and Services Tax (GST) celebrating its 2 nd anniversary in July 2019, one major area of concern ...

 
TIOL TUBE VIDEOS
 Legal Wrangle | Customs | Episode 110
Legal Wrangle | Corporate Law | Episode 109
 Legal Wrangle | International Taxation | Episode 108
TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED.
TIOL HOUSE, 490, Udyog Vihar, Phase - V,
Gurgaon, Haryana - 122001, INDIA
Board : +91 124-6427300
Fax: + 91 124-6427310
Web: https://taxindiaonline.com
Email: updates@tiol.in
__________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY/PROPRIETARY NOTE.
The Document accompanying this electronic transmission contains information from TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED., which is confidential, proprietary or copyrighted and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, without limitation, displaying this transmission or any portion thereof, on any public bulletin board. If you are not the intended recipient of this document, please return this document to TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED. immediately