2019-TIOL-NEWS-202 Part 2 | Tuesday August 27, 2019

Dear Member,

Sending following links.

Warm Regards,
TIOL Content Team


TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED.

For assistance please call us at + 91 850 600 0282 or email us at helpdesk@tiol.in.
TIOL Mail Update
TIOL TUBE VIDEO
  TIOLTube.com
 
 
 Legal Wrangle | Direct Tax | Episode 111
 
DIRECT TAX

Prasad Multi Services Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT

Whether an entity is pre-dominantly engaged in the business of hiring crane machines, then higher rate of depreciation cannot be denied solely because such entity might also be using such cranes for its personal construction business - YES: HC

Whether RTO registration is a sine qua non for allowing depreciation on a vehicle - NO: HC

- Assessee's appeal dismissed: GUJARAT HIGH COURT

2019-TIOL-1637-ITAT-DEL

Janak Goel Vs DCIT

Whether a passbook qualifies as books of account after introduction of the definition of books of accounts u/a 2(12A) of the Finance Act 2001 - YES: ITAT

Whether the provisions of Section 68 of the I-T Act make any distinction as to who writes the books of accounts and do not mandate that such books of accounts should be maintained by the assessee only - YES: ITAT

Whether therefore, even if the assessee does not maintain the books of accounts but an amount is deposited in the assessee's accounts and remains unexplained, additions made u/s 68 would be sustainable - YES: ITAT

- Assessee's appeals dismissed: DELHI ITAT

2019-TIOL-1626-ITAT-MUM

DCIT Vs Comet Investment Pvt Ltd

Whether in the absence of any evidence, addition on account of obtaining fictitious losses by way of CCM and on account of commission paid to brokers to obtain fictitious loss can be made when transactions take place on the Stock Exchange and no one except registered brokers can modify Client code - NO : ITAT

- Revenue's appeal dismissed: MUMBAI ITAT

2019-TIOL-1625-ITAT-MUM

Larsen and Toubro Infotech Ltd Vs Pr.CIT

Whether invoking jurisdiction u/s 263 by the CIT needs to be set aside, when the view taken by AO in allowing the assessee's claim u/s 10A is justified as per relevant provision - YES: ITAT

- Assessee's appeal allowed: MUMBAI ITAT

2019-TIOL-1624-ITAT-BANG

Chinnappa Anthonappa Vs ACIT

Whether deduction u/s 54B can be allowed if assessee has utilized, within a period of two years from the date of transfer of capital asset, the capital gain in purchasing another land for being used for agricultural purposes - YES : ITAT

Whether benefit of deduction u/s 54B can be denied merely because assessee does not get legal title to the lands when all other conditions are satisfied - NO : ITAT

- Assessee's appeal allowed: BANGALORE ITAT

2019-TIOL-1623-ITAT-PUNE

S K Bhansali and Associates Vs ITO

Whether addition u/s 69B on account of on-money payment for purchase of land can be made based on documents seized during search operation coupled with un-rebutted statements of seller of land explaining the entire transaction, same as recorded on seized documents - YES : ITAT

- Assessee's appeal dismissed: PUNE ITAT

2019-TIOL-1622-ITAT-AHM

Rakeshbhai K Rajput Vs ITO

Whether in absence of any explanation filed by the assessee regarding STCG earned, the addition made for undisclosed STCG based on justified method adopted by AO should be upheld - YES : ITAT

- Assessee's appeal dismissed: AHMEDABAD ITAT

2019-TIOL-1621-ITAT-AHM

Systronics India Ltd Vs ACIT

Whether merely because obtaining usecured loans is time-saving, not much paperwork and no guarantee, assessee is justified to pay interest rate @ 18% to its associated enterprise - YES: ITAT

Whether foreign travelling expenses merits no disallowance, if assessee has put forth relevant details & evidences to explain the purpose of such expenses in nexus with business expenditure- YES: ITAT

- Assessee's appeal allowed: AHMEDABAD ITAT

 
INDIRECT TAX

SERVICE TAX

2019-TIOL-2426-CESTAT-ALL

Anurag EnterprisesVs Commissioner of CGST

ST - The assessee was providing Works Contract Services to various Government Organizations, including M/s NBCC - In terms of the relevant provisions of law 50% of Service Tax leviable on such services was required to be paid by Service Provider and the balance 50% by the recipient, on Reverse Charge Basis - The refund claims filed by assessee stand rejected by the Original Authority on the ground that since the same was paid in the jurisdiction of M/s NBCC, the refund claims filed with him are outside his jurisdiction - The assessee having filed the refund claims with their jurisdictional Service Tax Authorities under a bona-fide belief that the claims have to be dealt with by him, and if the concerned office was not having jurisdiction, the reasonable course of action on the part of the officer was to transfer the claim to the relevant office having jurisdiction to decide the same, under intimation to the assessee - Examining from another angle also, if the assessee is now required to file a fresh refund claim, the same would not be hit by the bar of limitation, inasmuch as, the period during which the same were pending before wrong forum and were under litigation has to be excluded - The Assistant Commissioner is directed to transfer the assessee's application for refund to the proper concerned office having jurisdiction to deal with the same: CESTAT

- Appeal disposed of: ALLAHABAD CESTAT

2019-TIOL-2425-CESTAT-DEL

Aakriti Construction Vs CCE & ST

ST - The assessee is engaged in providing 'Commercial or Industrial Services', 'Construction of Residential Complex Services' and 'Work Contract Services' - The SCN was issued to assessee on the allegation that the value of free supply of steels/cement was not being included by them in their gross amount charged for payment of service tax, and therefore, they were not eligible for benefit of Notfn 15/2004-ST and 01/2006-ST in respect of abatement contained in these Notification - Further the SCN also alleged that the Service Tax has not been paid by assessee while constructing building for Jaipur National University and Bhagwan Mahavir Cancel Hospital and for construction of residential houses by some of their clients - Regarding the first submission about the abatement under Notfn 15/2004 and 01/2006-ST, the issue has been settled in favour of assessee by the decision of Tribunal in case of Bhayana Builders 2013-TIOL-1331-CESTAT-DEL-LB - In respect of issue regarding the construction of building for Jaipur National University and Bhagwan Mahavir Cancer Hospital it is not in dispute that they are the educational institute recognized by the Government and is also charitable institute for health care services - Thus, the assessee have rightly placed reliance on CBEC Circular which exempted the institute established for educational, religious charitable and philanthropic purposes - Regarding the construction of individual houses, these houses have been built by individuals, namely, Shri C Sharma, Uttam Chan Jain, Dr. Hemawati Gupta (Bansal), for their personal use which is clearly excluded from the definition of Construction of Residential Complex Service under the Act - Regarding the limitation, assessee was under bonafide belief of non levy of service tax under the Act, as per CBEC Circular - There was no malafide intention to evade payment of tax and hence the extended period is not invokable - The impugned order is set aside on merits as well as under limitation: CESTAT

- Appeal allowed: DELHI CESTAT

 

 

 

CENTRAL EXCISE

2019-TIOL-2427-CESTAT-ALL

Awadhesh Agnihotri Vs CCE & ST

CX - Demand of duty confirmed against M/s Shyam Traders, who were engaged in manufacture of Pan Masala and Gutkha and was working under provisions of PMPM Rules, 2008 - Further, penalty of identical amount was also imposed on them along with imposition of penalty on assessee, the authorized signatory of M/s Shyam Traders - The demand against main assessee stands dropped by Commissioner (A) along with setting aside the penalty imposed upon them - As such, no justification found for imposition of penalty on the employee of manufacturing unit, who was production incharge and authorized signatory: CESTAT

- Appeal allowed: ALLAHABAD CESTAT

 

 

 

 

CUSTOMS

2019-TIOL-2424-CESTAT-KOL

CC Vs Amar Textiles

Cus - The assessee imported used and worn unmutilated and fumigated mix cloth and Bills of entry were filed covering the consignments of import - At the time of original assessment, the declared value of imported goods was enhanced from CIF price of US$ 1.10 per kg to US$ 1.316 per kg - The original adjudicating authority ordered confiscation of imported goods for violation of Import Trade Control restrictions and the goods were confiscated under Section 111(d) of Customs Act, 1962 - He also imposed redemption fine under Section 125 of the Act and personal penalty under Section 112(a) of the Act - The Commissioner (A) has ordered reduction of redemption fine and personal penalty on the basis of ratio laid down by Three Member Bench of CESTAT in the case of Omex International 2015-TIOL-582-CESTAT-DEL - The Three Member Bench has taken the view that redemption fine of 10% and penalty of 5% of the value of imported goods, would be appropriate in case of import violating Exim Policy Provisions - No reason found to interfere with the findings of Commissioner (A) on the basis of such decision - The impugned orders are upheld: CESTAT

- Appeals rejected: KOLKATA CESTAT

 
HIGH LIGHTS (SISTER PORTALS)
TII

I-T - No income can be deemed to have accrued or arisen in India of non-resident suppliers in relation to purchases made by Indian entity, in absence of any business connection between two: ITAT

TP - Entity having pool of both software development & ITES segments are not comparable on entity level with international transaction of pure 'Software development': ITAT

I-T - When non-resident consultant has no fixed base in India, then question of attributing income to such base does not arise at all: ITAT

TP - Incidental benefits accrued to related parties out of shareholders activity, cannot be construed as 'intra group services' warranting ALP adjustment: ITAT

TP - Assessment framed against non-existing entity goes to root of matter and it is not procedural irregularity but jurisdictional defect: ITAT

DTAA - Once service recipient makes use of technical knowledge by himself in his business and for his own benefits, then payments made for such services are to be treated as FTS: ITAT

TIOL COPRLAWS

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Parties at whim cannot condone delay for maximum time limit prescribed for completion of arbitration proceedings: SC Larger Bench

Trade Mark Act, 1999 - Adoption of meaningless word as trade name by new company which is deceptively similar to that of reputed trade style without any justification amounts to false representation making a case for trade mark infringment : HC

Trade Marks Act, 1999 - There is no likelihood of confusion on part of public by using commonplace marks/words alongwith with house/brand name for perfumes where average consumer's are influenced by fragrance rather than names : HC

 

 

 

Download on the App Store
Get it on Google play

 

 


NEWS FLASH
FM interacts with taxmen in Pune; says Govt open to GST rate debate; asks industry to do business without worries
 
TOP NEWS
 
GUEST COLUMN
By By G Natarajan

GSTR 9 & 9C Extension of due date - A cause to rejoice?

ALL social media platforms are replete with the images...

 
CIRCULAR
CENTRAL EXCISE

excircular1071

Sabka Vishwas Scheme - CBIC issues detailed Circular clarifying many technical points

INCOME TAX

it19cir21

CBDT issues detailed clarification for filling up ITRs for Current AY

CUSTOMS

cuscir26_2019

IGST Export Refunds - CBIC clarifies on extension in SB005 alternate mechanism and revised processing in certain cases including disbursal of compensation Cess

cuscir25_2019

IGST refunds - mechanism to verify the IGST payments for goods exported out of India in certain cases

 
TIOL TUBE VIDEOS
 Legal Wrangle | Customs | Episode 110
Legal Wrangle | Corporate Law | Episode 109
 Legal Wrangle | International Taxation | Episode 108
TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED.
TIOL HOUSE, 490, Udyog Vihar, Phase - V,
Gurgaon, Haryana - 122001, INDIA
Board : +91 124-6427300
Fax: + 91 124-6427310
Web: https://taxindiaonline.com
Email: updates@tiol.in
__________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY/PROPRIETARY NOTE.
The Document accompanying this electronic transmission contains information from TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED., which is confidential, proprietary or copyrighted and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, without limitation, displaying this transmission or any portion thereof, on any public bulletin board. If you are not the intended recipient of this document, please return this document to TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED. immediately