 |
 |
2021-TIOL-NEWS-073| March 27 2021
|
 |
 |
Dear Member,
Sending following links. Warm Regards,
TIOL Content Team
TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED.
For assistance please call us at + 91 850 600 0282 or email us at helpdesk@tiol.in. |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
INCOME TAX |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
2021-TIOL-728-HC-MAD-IT
Doosan Infracore India Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT
Whether mere intimation u/s 127 for transfer of file to jurisdictional ITO in case of merger, is not sufficient discharge of obligation on part of taxpayer to inform Tax Department about merger - YES: HC
Whether amalgamation cannot be used as tool to defeat assessment and re-assessment proceedings - YES: HC
Whether when taxpayer himself actively participated in re assessment proceedings of amalgamated company by defending the proceedings, then it cannot be said that order has been passed in name of defunct company to scuttle re-assessment proceeding - YES: HC
- Case disposed of: MADRAS HIGH COURT
2021-TIOL-727-HC-AHM-IT
Rajena Agro Products Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT
Whether once additions made during assessment stood deleted by ITAT and has attained finality, then reopening on basis of such addition presuming it to be escaped income, is without authority of law - YES: HC
- Assessee's writ application allowed: GUJARAT HIGH COURT
2021-TIOL-589-ITAT-MUM
Rolex Steel And Engineering Company Vs ITO
Whether additions on account of bogus purchases framed @ 12.5% merit being reduced to 6% where the assessee is able to file some documents in support of such purchases, while being unable to furnish other documents - YES: ITAT
- Assessee's appeal partly allowed: MUMBAI ITAT
2021-TIOL-588-ITAT-MUM
Hicon Constructions Vs DCIT
Whether hundred per cent disallowance for bogus purchase cannot be done, if sales are not doubted - YES: ITAT
- Assesee's appeal partly allowed: MUMBAI ITAT
2021-TIOL-587-ITAT-MUM
Seth Hirachand Mutha Shaikshanik Trust Vs ITO
Whether interest u/s 234E can be demanded in respect of a period which is before the date on which the provisions of Section 234E came into effect - NO: ITAT
- Assessee's appeal allowed: MUMBAI ITAT
2021-TIOL-586-ITAT-BANG
Prakash Babu Nakundhi Krishna Reddy Vs ACIT
Whether it is a fit case for remand where the assessee is required to explain the source of cash deposit in the cash account with supporting evidence - YES: ITAT
- Case remanded: BANGALORE ITAT
| |
|
 |
   |
 |
|
 |
 |
GST CASE |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
2021-TIOL-103-AAR-GST
Manoj Mittal
GST - The applicant runs a business divided in two sections - One section has a sweet parlour and the applicant is claimed to be engaged in selling sweetmeats, namkeens and bakery items off the counter in the form of takeaways from the said sweet parlour - In the other section of the premises, the applicant is claimed to be engaged in preparing and serving fast food snacks and beverage items which can either be consumed at the premises or allowed as takeaways - Additionally, the applicant is also providing catering services to an educational institution which provides education services up to secondary school - The applicant approached the AAR seeking to know whether sale from the portion of the sweetmeats and bakery shop should be categorized as supply of goods; whether input tax credit should be eligible on the sale of items specified in the preceding question; can the supply of food items and beverages from the facility which offers the opportunity of eating at the same premises be classified as restaurant services attracting a rate of GST of 5%; can input tax credit be availed on restaurant services; in case of receipt of common input tax credit in the form of inputs, input services and capital goods, will reversal of input tax credit be required in terms of Rule 42 and 43 of the CGST Rules 2017; and whether the catering services provided to the educational institution qualify as an exempt supply based on the agreement.
Held - The supply of food and beverages from the sweetmeats counter by the applicant, where the customers have not been provided with any services in relation to consume the same in the premises, shall be categorized as supply of goods and the applicant is eligible to avail input tax credit in respect of such supply of goods subject to conditions as laid down in Chapter V of the GST Act and rules made there under - Supply of food items and beverages by the applicant which offers the facility of eating in the same premises along with takeaway of the same shall be treated as restaurant services and shall attract tax @ 5% provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken - Supply of catering services to the educational institution, based on the agreement, is found to be covered under entry serial number 66 (b)(ii) of the Exemption Notification No. 12/2017- CT(R), as amended from time to time (corresponding West Bengal State Notification No. 1136 F.T. dated 28.06.2017) and shall, therefore, be exempted from payment of tax - Supply of food and beverages to the auditor, guests/ parents on programme days, as it appears from the agreement shall be treated as 'outdoor catering' and shall attract tax @ 5% vide entry serial number 7(iv) of the Notification No. 11/2017- CT(R) dated the 28th June, 2017, as amended from time to time (corresponding West Bengal State Notification No. 1135 F.T. dated 28.06.2017) provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken - The applicant shall follow the principle of apportionment of credit as laid down in sub-section (1) and (2) of section 17 of the GST Act read with rule 42 and 43 of the CGST/WBGST Rules, 2017 in respect of common input tax credit in the form of inputs, input services and capital goods: AAR
- Application disposed of: AAR
2021-TIOL-102-AAR-GST
Isotex Corporation Pvt Ltd
GST - The applicant-company is engaged in the manufacture of "Waste to Energy Plants/Devices" viz. Agro Waste Thermic Fluid Heater - These fall under Tariff Item 8402 19 90 as Tariff Item 8402 covers within its ambit Steam or other Vapour Generating Boilers - Such items are manufactured from either of two units of the applicant located in Ahmedabad & Bharuch - The applicant approached the AAR seeking to know the the classification & rate of tax payable in respect of Agro Waste Thermic Fluid Heater or Boiler and parts thereof considering the applicability of Sr. No. 234 of Schedule I to Notification No.1/2017-CT(R) and corresponding notifications issued under State GST law and IGST Act.
Held - The Agro Waste Thermic Fluid Heaters or Boilers are classifiable under heading 8402 19 19 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and attract 9% CGST + 9% SGST in terms of Sr. No. 310 of Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017-CT(R) & the corresponding Notification issued under GGST Act, 2017 OR 18% IGST in terms of Sr. No. 310 of Schedule III of Notification No.1/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate), as applicable: AAR
- Application disposed off: AAR
2021-TIOL-101-AAR-GST
Dhingra Trucking Pvt Ltd
GST - The applicant is a private limited company which constructed several logistics facility space (warehouse) in Haryana, measuring 50000 sq feet - It is in process of constructing another warehouse with additional 350000 sq feet - The applicant approached the AAR seeking to know whether Input Tax Credit of GST in respect of inputs/ capital goods used or intended to be used for creation of covered logistics facility space (warehouse) to be rented out for storage purposes be eligible for Input Tax Credit under the provisions of section 16 and 17 of the CGST Act, 2017 - Also whether Input Tax Credit of GST in respect of inputs in form of goods and services be eligible if the goods and services are consumed and used in construction of covered logistic facility space when the said Input Tax Credit would be utilized in order to discharge and pay CGST and HGST/ IGST on rent received from tenants of the warehouse.
Held - The applicant is not eligible to input tax credit in respect of inputs/ capital goods used or intended to be used for creation of covered logistics facility space (warehouse) to be rented out for storage purposes - Since no credit of input tax in respect of input goods or services consumed and used in the construction of covered logistic facility space is available, there arises no possibility of utilization of the same: AAR
- Application disposed of: AAR
|
|
|
 |
   |
 |
|
 |
 |
INDIRECT TAX |
 |
|
  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
2021-TIOL-729-HC-MAD-CX
Mcsara Constructions Vs CCE
CX - The petitioner had carried out the contract works for second respondent - There is no doubt that the second respondent is an educational trust that is enjoying exemption under the Income Tax Act - The petitioner's stand from the beginning is that the service provided to such an educational trust cannot be called as commercial or industrial service - Such a finding cannot be rendered behind the back of the second respondent - In the very nature of things, the second respondent is both a necessary as well as an interested party - The petitioner's contention that nonimpleading of second respondent in adjudicating proceedings is really a serious defect, sustained, that vitiates the entire proceedings - That apart, it is evident from the record that the petitioner had also paid service tax for the period from 01.07.2012 onwards - Rs. 8,40,563/- was paid by the petitioner on 27.03.2013 and 31.03.2013 - This was well before passing of impugned order - The first respondent does not appear to have taken note of remittance made by petitioner - Therefore, on these twin grounds, matter is remitted to the file of first respondent to pass orders afresh in accordance with law - The first respondent shall invoke his power under Section 14 of CEA, 1944 and summon the second respondent and will render a finding as to whether the service rendered by the petitioner to the second respondent is a commercial or industrial service by applying the tests laid down by Supreme Court in M/s.Queen's Educational Society 2015-TIOL-20-SC-IT : HC
- Matter remanded: MADRAS HIGH COURT
2021-TIOL-174-CESTAT-DEL
KEC International Ltd Vs CCE & CGST
CX - The assessee filed a refund claim on account of amount being shown as the closing balance in their current account as on 30 June, 2017 - The Government, however, observing that since the refund has been claimed on 30 July, 2018 for the cash balance of 30 June 2016, the same appears to be hit by limitation of period of one year - Accordingly, a SCN was issued to assessee proposing the rejection thereof - The amount as was prayed to be refunded is admittedly an amount other than the duty or interest which is the subject matter of refund under Section 11B - Section 11B should not have been made applicable upon the impugned refund - Simultaneously, other than Section 11B, there is no provision under which the Department can refund the impugned amount or which permits the withdrawal of deposits - The impugned SCN was issued objecting the application of refund to be barred by limitation - There was no other option with Adjudicating Authority to follow the mandate of Section 11B(1) of CEA, 1944 - It has already been a settled law that in making claims for refund before Departmental Authorities an assessee is bound within four corners of the statute and the period of limitation prescribed in Central Excise Act and Rules framed there-under must be adhered to - Accordingly, no infirmity found in the impugned order - Apparently and admittedly the impugned amount of Rs. 3,10,312/- is not an amount of duty but a deposit by assessee lying with the Department - In terms of principles of equity, assessee is entitled for the refund thereof - However, this Tribunal being a quasi-judicial authority has no jurisdiction to appreciate the principles of equity: CESTAT
- Appeal dismissed: DELHI CESTAT
2021-TIOL-173-CESTAT-BANG
G Narayan And Company Vs CC
Cus - A passenger Mrs. Shahin Taj Begum returned to India from Dubai and filed unaccompanied baggage declaration under Section 77 of Customs Act, 1962 through appellant for clearance of 128 packages as personal effects/household articles under the Baggage Rules, 2016 - As per Customs, appellant has misdeclared the consignment and only 54 packages pertained to household articles and personal effects and the remaining 85 packages contained various cosmetic items in commercial quantity - Thereafter, the passenger consented for waiver of SCN and personal hearing and the Additional Commissioner held that 54 packages were liable to be classified as baggage under Tariff Item 9803 00 00 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - The Additional Commissioner also imposed penalties on passenger as well as on the appellant under provisions of Section 112(a) of the Act - Revenue has not been able to bring any evidence on record which shows that the appellant had prior knowledge regarding violation of provisions of Customs Act - The Tribunal in its Final Order dated 04/07/2019 reduced the penalties imposed on passenger after holding that there was no suppression of facts by passenger - Once the passenger has not suppressed any material fact then how it can be said that the appellant has abetted the passenger in commission of certain violation of Customs Act - No proceedings were initiated against appellant under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 - Moreover, issuance of SCN in de novo remand proceedings is not permitted under law - The imposition of penalty of Rs. 2,50,000/- on the appellant is not sustainable in law and therefore same is set aside: CESTAT
- Appeal allowed: BANGALORE CESTAT |
|
|
 |
   |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
NEWS FLASH |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
NOTIFICATION |
 |
|
  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
it21not19
I-T - Sec 10(23C) - CBDT substitutes Rule 2C, 5CA & 5F and notifies Form No 3CF, 10A, 10AB, 10AC & 10AD
ctariffadd21_017
CBIC imposes Anti Dumping Duty on 2 Ethyl Hexanol imported from EU, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, Taiwan and USA ctariffadd21_016
CBIC rescinds Notification imposing Anti Dumping Duty on 2 Ethyl Hexanol imported from Taiwan, Phillipines, Malaysia and Vietnam ctariffadd21_015
CBIC extends levy of Anti Dumping Duty on Tyre Curing Presses imported from China PR |
|
|
 |
   |
 |
|
 |
 |
TOP NEWS |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED.
TIOL HOUSE, 490, Udyog Vihar, Phase - V,
Gurgaon, Haryana - 122001, INDIA
Board :
+91 124-6427300
Fax: + 91 124-6427310
Web: https://taxindiaonline.com
Email: updates@tiol.in
__________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY/PROPRIETARY NOTE.
The Document accompanying this electronic transmission contains information from TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED., which is confidential, proprietary or copyrighted and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, without limitation, displaying this transmission or any portion thereof, on any public bulletin board. If you are not the intended recipient of this document, please return this document to TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED. immediately |
 |
|
 |