|
2021-TIOL-1193-HC-RAJ-GST
Abhishek Singhal Vs UoI
GST - Petitioner, a Chartered Accountant has filed a bail application in the matter of his arrest in connection with the offence u/s 132 of the CGST Act, 2017 - Petitioner submits that he has been falsely implicated in this matter and he is not liable for the offences committed by co-accused persons; that the maximum sentence for the offences alleged is five years and the petitioner is in custody since 19.02.2021 and conclusion of trial may take long time; that co-accused persons have already been released on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court - Counsel for Revenue submits that the allegation against the petitioner is of availment by passing of ITC wrongfully to the tune of Rs.6,36,32,492/- by creating 38 fake firms; that the petitioner has absconded for about one year.
Held: Bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner deserves to be dismissed; for the reasons, firstly, that the petitioner failed to appear before the Department while notices were issued to him, secondly, even after filing of complaint before the Trial court, he remained absconded for about one year and thirdly, the petitioner is a chartered accountant, who is mastermind of the crime and he has created 38 fake firms and availed ITC wrongfully to the tune of Rs.6,36,32,492/- - No case is made out to release the petitioner on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C, hence bail application stands dismissed: High Court [para 6 to 8]
-Application dismissed :RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
2021-TIOL-1192-HC-RAJ-GST
Bhagwan Sahay Gupta Vs UoI
GST - Petitioner, a CA, is in custody since January 2020 and seeks bail in the matter of complaint filed for offence u/s 132 of the CGST Act, 2017 - It is the contention of the Respondent Revenue that petitioner was instrumental in registration of 11 fake firms and these firms have availed input tax credit to the tune of Rs.146 crores; that petitioner was aware as he was filing GST returns of non-existent firms - P etitioner submits that he took registration of the firms on the basis of documents provided by the co-accused; that his statement was retracted as he was subjected to beating by the Officers - Revenue contention is that the petitioner instead of charging Rs.1500/- per GST return filing, charged around Rs.3,500/- per GST return - Petitioner further contends that as per the charge-sheet, petitioner has only received Rs.75,000/- for filing GST returns and Rs.5,000/- per firm for the registration, however, there is no allegation in the complaint that he has received any amount or any percentage with regard to the wrong input tax credit.
Held: Taking note of the fact that Chartered Accountant has remained in custody for a period of one year and five months and that petitioner is also having a child and also considering the contentions put forth, Bench deems it proper to allow the bail application - Application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the trial court: High Court [para 8, 9]
-Application allowed :RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT |
|