 |
 |
2021-TIOL-NEWS-189| August 11, 2021
|
 |
 |
Dear Member,
Sending following links. Warm Regards,
TIOL Content Team
TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED.
For assistance please call us at + 91 7838594749 or email us at helpdesk@tiol.in. |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
INCOME TAX |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
2021-TIOL-1665-HC-MUM-IT
Ashok G Jhaveri Vs UoI
Whether an application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme merits being accepted where the applicant suffers the handicap of lodging an appeal before the specified date - YES: HC
- Writ petitions disposed of: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
2021-TIOL-1664-HC-MUM-IT
Stone Shippers Ltd Vs DCIT
In writ, the High Court observes the refund amount claimed by the assessee has partially been credited to the assessee's bank account and that the refund of the remaining amount is being processed with the CPC, Bangalore. Hence the Court directs that the remaining amount be disbursed expeditiously, within four weeks' time.
- Assessee's writ petition disposed of: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
2021-TIOL-1303-ITAT-MUM
ACIT Vs Maharashtra State Transmission Company Ltd
Whether liability pertaining to earlier AY can be added as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 in hands of assessee for year under consideration – NO: ITAT
- Revenue's appeal dismissed: MUMBAI ITAT
2021-TIOL-1302-ITAT-MUM
Advait Entertainment Pvt Ltd Vs ITO
Whether AO jurisdiction to make assessment with regard to the issues which are referred to the AO by the tribunal is very limited and confined to the set aside issues & AO has no power to add any other amount other than what has been restored - YES: ITAT
- Assessee's appeal allowed: MUMBAI ITAT
2021-TIOL-1301-ITAT-MUM
Zydus Takeda Healthcare Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT
Whether it is a fit case for remand where the CIT (A) passes ex parte order without providing sufficient opportunity of personal hearing to the assessee - YES: ITAT
- Matter remanded: MUMBAI ITAT
| |
|
 |
   |
 |
|
 |
 |
MISC CASE |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
GST CASE |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
2021-TIOL-187-AAR-GST
National Institute of Technology
GST - Applicant, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli (NITT) is a Government Entity - Applicant is liable to deduct tax at source (TDS) under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Notification No. 50/2018-C.T - The applicant is required to discharge liability on reverse charge basis on Legal services received by them as per Section 9(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 - In respect of security services, Reverse charge mechanism will not apply as the services have been provided by a body corporate, as evidenced by the documents submitted - Furthermore, ruling can be sought by recipient of a supply, who are made liable to pay tax under Section 9(3) only with regard to determination of their liability to pay or not and such recipients cannot seek ruling on the applicability of an exemption notification/preferential rates on such supplies received by them: AAR
- Application disposed of: AAR
2021-TIOL-186-AAR-GST
Krishna Bhavan Foods And Sweets
GST - Dosai Mix, Idli Mix, Tiffin Mixes, Health Mixes, Porridge Mixes are food preparations in the form of powder; are appropriately classifiable under HSN 2106 and attract GST @18% as per Entry no. 23 of Schedule III of Notification 1/2017-CTR: AAR
- Application disposed of: AAR
2021-TIOL-27-AAAR-GST
Britannia Industries Ltd
GST - UHT Sterilized Flavoured Milk marketed under the brand name 'Britannia Winkin' Cow Thick Shake' by the appellant is not classifiable under the Tariff heading '0402/0404" but is classifiable under CTH 22029930 as held by the AAR - Appeal dismissed: AAAR
- Appeal dismissed: AAAR
2021-TIOL-26-AAAR-GST
New Tirupur Area Development Corporation Ltd
GST - Issues pertain to a concession agreement entered into by the appellant with the Government of Tamilnadu and Tirupur Municipality on 11th February 2000 by which the appellant, among others, undertook under contractual terms to abstract raw water from the river bed, treat it for making it fit for use and supply the same for domestic and non-domestic purposes to Tirupur Municipality and other purchasers - Section 2.4 of the agreement provides for royalty payment by the appellant to the Government of Tamilnadu, one of the parties to the agreement, for the abstraction of such volume of raw water from time to time - Once royalty is charged and collected for the abstraction right, the raw water abstracted becomes the property of the appellant - It is also seen from the agreement that potable water is the output after treatment of the raw water by the appellant, and which is the only supply made by the appellant to all the purchasers - From the scope, language and the terms and conditions of the agreement, it is clearly seen that the appellant has been awarded a contract for the sole purpose of supply of potable water to the purchasers, among others, after treating the raw water from the river bed - The activity of the appellant is thus only a supply of potable water to its purchasers - In other words, supply of goods and not of services - There is no dispute regarding the classification of water as such under 2201 - Potable water is never to be equated to 'purified water' - Potable water has only one meaning, water fit for human and animal consumption and has dissolved minerals - In chemical terms, purified water is pure H2O and only contains Hydrogen and Oxygen and no minerals - Once it is distinctly clear that the supply is of 'water' only, and NOT purified water, the same falls under the entry 99 of the notification no. 02/2017-CT (R) and is qualified for the exemption - Reference made by the AAR on the divergent views as well as the ruling sought by the appellant, is answered as affirmative with regard to exemption available to the supply of potable water made by the appellant under notfn. No. 2/2017-CT (R) ibid - With regard to the other questions raised in the appeal, Appellate authority concurs with the reasoning and the ruling given by the AAR - Appeal is disposed of: AAAR
- Appeal disposed of: AAAR
|
|
|
 |
   |
 |
|
 |
 |
INDIRECT TAX |
 |
|
  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
2021-TIOL-462-CESTAT-DEL
Sun Art Exporter Vs CCGST
CX - The appellant have exported 448 units of handicraft on 30.07.2015, within a week after the date of debonding being 27.07.2015 when only 153 units were lying in stock - The refund claim have been rejected on presumptions and assumptions that such 153 units may not have been included in exported units as there has been further production of 448 units on 28-29.07.2015 - Such presumption is drawn without any adverse finding or any adverse material on record - It is held that the appellant have exported 153 units lying in stock on the date of debonding - Appellant is entitled to refund of the duty - Accordingly, Adjudicating Authority is directed to refund this amount alongwith interest from 18.08.2016 till the date of refund @ 12% p.a. as held by Division Bench of this Tribunal in Parle Agro (P) Ltd. : CESTAT
- Appeal allowed: DELHI CESTAT
2021-TIOL-461-CESTAT-MAD
N Ranga Rao And Sons Pvt Ltd Vs CC
Cus - The "Raw Agarbathies" classified under Tariff Item 3307 41 00 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 became a restricted item for import into India vide Sl. No. III of D.G.F.T. Notification No. 15/2015-2020 - The invoices raised by supplier are well within the date of Notfn, by which time the contract between importer and the supplier had concluded - Thus, no mala fides found in so far as import of goods in question are concerned - Admittedly, prohibition in question was not in force as on the date of invoice and it is nobody's case that the appellant was aware as to the change in law at the time of signing of contract or when the invoice was raised in terms of contract - The co-ordinate Bench of CESTAT in case of M/s. P.T. Impex Pvt. Ltd. 2013-TIOL-2431-CESTAT-DEL supports the above view, which order was also confirmed by High Court in 2015-TIOL-1015-HC-MAD-CUS - No justification found in redemption fine and penalty being imposed on appellant and accordingly, the impugned order is set aside - The redemption fine imposed and penalty levied stand deleted: CESTAT
- Appeals allowed: CHENNAI CESTAT
2021-TIOL-460-CESTAT-BANG
Comfort Night Linen Products Vs CCT & CE
ST - The appellants filed refund claims which arose as a consequence of introduction of Section 104 of Finance Act w.e.f. 31.03.2017 - Notification No. 41/2016 has exempted taxable service provided by State Government Industrial Development Corporation/Undertakings to industrial units by way of granting long term lease on industrial plot from so much of service tax leviable thereon under Section 66B of said Act, as is leviable on the one-time upfront amount payable for such lease - The appellants filed the refund claims within time and the only ground for which the refunds were rejected by the Original Authority and upheld by the Appellate Authority is that the appellants did not produce sufficient documents in the form of invoices/bills showing that they have paid the service tax to KINFRA - During the pendency of appeals, appellants filed various invoices/bills issued by KINFRA showing the payment of service tax by appellant for which the refund claims have been filed by them - KINFRA has also issued a certificate certifying that they have not availed any CENVAT credit on service tax paid by appellants - These bills/invoices issued by KINFRA clearly show the payment of service tax by appellant to KINFRA and KINFRA in turn has paid the same to the Government - Since the appellants have produced sufficient documents to prove the payment of service tax, no justification found for rejection of refund claims and hence, the impugned orders are set aside: CESTAT
- Appeals allowed: BANGALORE CESTAT
|
|
|
 |
   |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
NEWS FLASH |
 |
|
  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Banks to attract penalty for leaving no cash in ATM from October 1, 2021
COVID-19: Global daily death count again swells close to 9500 + Fresh cases - US reports 92K; India 36 & Indonesia remains epicentre with over 2000 deaths
COVID-19 eats up 5 billionaires - Indian list down from 141 to 136 in 20-21, says FM
US to produce 26% electricity from coal in 2021 - up from 22% in 2020
Bill tabled in Lok Sabha to acquire some machinery powers under Homoeopathy Act 2020 & passed
Vaccine - India also peeping deeper into papers for booster dose: Dr V K Paul
China calls back Ambassador from Lithuania over Taiwan office
Hackers walk away with a booty of USD 600 mn in crypto from US platform for digital tokens swapping
Delhi IGI Airport Customs seizes heroin worth Rs 53 Crore from shampoo bottles
NY Democrat Governor Cuomo finally puts in papers after a blizzard of sexual-gate cases hits him + Kathy Hochul may lead NY as first woman to lead State in 233 yrs history
India ranked 122nd on New Global Youth Development Index
COVID-19 surges again in Israel + Merkel's worries swell for 4th Wave
Heaves & Wildfires kill at least 42 in Algeria
US Senate finally does it - okays USD one trillion infra package: Yellen hails it
COVID-19: R Factor swells to 16% in Kerala; Over 21K fresh cases reported |
|
|
 |
   |
 |
|
 |
 |
JEST GST |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
TOP NEWS |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
NOTIFICATION |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED.
TIOL HOUSE, 490, Udyog Vihar, Phase - V,
Gurgaon, Haryana - 122001, INDIA
Web: https://taxindiaonline.com
Email: updates@tiol.in
__________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY/PROPRIETARY NOTE.
The Document accompanying this electronic transmission contains information from TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED., which is confidential, proprietary or copyrighted and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, without limitation, displaying this transmission or any portion thereof, on any public bulletin board. If you are not the intended recipient of this document, please return this document to TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED. immediately |
 |
|
 |