Like TIOL on Facebook Follow TIOL on TwitterSubscriber TIOL on YouTube

2023-TIOL-NEWS-023| January 28, 2023

Dear Member,

Sending following links.

Warm Regards,
TIOL Content Team


TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED.

For assistance please call us at + 91 7838594749 or email us at helpdesk@tiol.in.
TIOL Mail Update
 
TIOL AWARDS

 
TODAY'S CASE (DIRECT TAX)

I-T- No distinction between term 'development of housing in India' and 'purchase & construction of housing in India for residential purposes' as given u/s 36(1)(viii): ITAT

I-T - Power u/s 263 can be exercised by PCIT as nothing on record to exhibit any enquiry by AO in the matter and no whisper of sec. 56(2)(vii)(b) in order passed : ITAT

I-T- Power division constitutes an 'eligible business' u/s 80IA(1), on the profit of which deduction can be claimed : ITAT

 
INCOME TAX

2023-TIOL-116-ITAT-KOL

Mohit Jindal Vs ITO

Whether the rate % applicable on the undisclosed turnover of the assessee is to be determied with the help of assessee's profit margin on sale - YES: ITAT

- Assessee's appeal allowed: KOLKATA ITAT

2023-TIOL-115-ITAT-PUNE

Col Rd Nikam Sainik Sahakari Bank Ltd Vs ACIT

Whether there is distinction between "development of housing in India" and "purchase & construction of housing in India" for residential purposes u/s 36(1)(viii) to deny the assessee deduction under the same - NO: ITAT

- Assessee's appeal allowed: PUNE ITAT

2023-TIOL-114-ITAT-JABALPUR

Rita Manchhani Vs Pr.CIT

Whether power u/s 263 can be exercised by PCIT as nothing on record to exhibit any enquiry by AO in the matter and no whisper of sec. 56(2)(vii)(b) in order passed - YES : ITAT

- Assessee's appeal dismissed: JABALPUR ITAT

2023-TIOL-113-ITAT-JABALPUR

ACIT Vs Mahakaushal Sugar And Power Industries Ltd

Whether power division constitutes an 'eligible business' u/s 80IA(1), on the profit of which deduction can be claimed - YES : ITAT

- Case Remanded: JABALPUR ITAT

 
TODAY'S CASE (INDIRECT TAX)

Cus - A demand can be made under Undertaking only when DGCA finds that use of aircraft is not in accordance with permit granted by DGCA: CESTAT

CX - Since exemption notfn 30/2004-CE is not an absolute notification but a conditional notification, therefore bar of lapsing of credit shall not apply: CESTAT

ST - Since construction service was provided under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission, the service tax is not leviable to such project: CESTAT

 
INDIRECT TAX

2023-TIOL-80-CESTAT-DEL

Bharat Hotels Vs CC

Cus - Appeal filed against impugned order by which the aircraft imported by appellant against Bill of Entry on the basis of a non-scheduled operator permit (charter) issued by Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has been confiscated under section 111(0) of Customs Act, 1962with an option to redeem the same - The order also seeks to confirm customs duty in terms of undertaking given by appellant at the time of importation and also imposes penalty under section 112 of Customs Act - The only issue that arises for consideration in the present appeal is whether there has been any violation of Condition no. 104 of exemption notfn. 20/2009 - The issue as to whether DGCA is final authority and customs authorities are bound by views expressed by DGCA has been considered by Larger Bench of Tribunal in VRL Logistics wherein it has been held that customs authority can take action on the basis of Undertaking submitted by importer only when authority under DGCA holds that the conditions have been violated - Thus, a demand can be made under Undertaking only when DGCA finds that use of aircraft is not in accordance with permit granted by DGCA - DGCA has not initiated any proceedings against the appellant and in fact has renewed the permit from time to time - Such being in position, it would not be necessary to examine other contentions raised by appellant for setting aside impugned order - Once it is held that the demand could not have been confirmed, penalties imposed upon Chairman/Managing Director and Vice President of appellant cannot also be sustained: CESTAT

- Appeals allowed: DELHI CESTAT

2023-TIOL-79-CESTAT-AHM

Ruia Rayon Pvt Ltd Vs CCE & ST

CX - The issue involved is, whether appellant is entitled to carry forward the Cenvat credit after date of availment of exemption Notfn 30/2004-CE in terms of Rule 11(3) of Cenvet Credit Rules, 2004 and whether said credit can be utilised for payment of duty - Entire case of department is that since the appellant have availed exemption Notfn, they are not entitled to carry forward the accumulated Cenvat credit as on date of exemption Notification and accordingly, same was not eligible for utilisation for payment of duty - In facts of present case, notfn is admittedly a conditional one - In terms of strict provision of Rule 11(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, bar of lapsing of credit is applicable only when appellant avail the absolute exemption notification - Therefore, exemption notfn 30/2004-CE, being a conditional one, bar of lapsing of credit shall not apply - Issue is no longer res integra - Accordingly, following the judgments in Patodia Filaments Pvt Ltd. 2019-TIOL-2877-CESTAT-AHM and Jansons Textile Processors 2018-TIOL-3731-CESTAT-MAD impugned orders are not sustainable, hence the same are set aside: CESTAT

- Appeals allowed: AHMEDABAD CESTAT

2023-TIOL-78-CESTAT-AHM

M S Khurana Engineering Ltd Vs CST

ST - The appellant during the period under consideration were engaged in business of construction of residential Complex services under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM) - All the project executed by appellant under JnNURM scheme pertained to construction of House for Economic Weaker Section (EWS) - As per department service tax on "Construction of Complex Service" was levied under Sub-Section (105)(zzzh) of Section 65 of Finance Act, 1994 w.e.f. 16.06.2005 - Appellant was issued SCN for demanding Service Tax alongwith interest and penalty - From the judgment in matter of Santosh Katiyar 2017-TIOL-1572-CESTAT-DEL it can be seen that identical fact is involved in said judgment and in case in hand in as much as in both the cases the construction service was provided to Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission and Rajiv Awaas Yojana - On this common fact in said judgment, it was held that the service tax is not leviable to such project - Hence, the ratio of said judgment is directly applicable - Impugned order is clearly not sustainable, hence the same is set aside: CESTAT

- Appeal allowed: AHMEDABAD CESTAT

 

 

Download on the App Store
Get it on Google play

 


NEWS FLASH
 

IAF loses two more fighter planes after take-off from Gwalior base

24-yr-old Sabalenka wins Australian Open

Bengaluru DRI’s Operation Kalki busts wildlife smuggling syndicate

US, EU to ink first of its kind treaty on Artificial Intelligence

Nepal Deputy PM steps down as court rules his ID invalid

Rain, rain, go away but NO! New Zealand declares Emergency

US House to vote on Bill to ban Tik Tok with 100 mn user-base

Palestinian gunman kills 7 including children at Jerusalem Synagogue

AI helping Meta's products Instagram & Facebook woo back visitors

Boeing goes against ‘firing streak' in US; to hire 10,000 in 2023

 
THE POLICY LAB
 

By J B Mohapatra

Mega Science Projects: The Economic & Diplomatic gains for India!

AMONG massive scale collaborative research efforts in varied frontiers of science cutting across geographic and cultural boundaries and across political dispensation of every kind...

 
TOP NEWS
 

CBIC celebrates International Customs Day, 2023

DRI detects 18 non-indigenous animals in checked-in baggage

Centre clears 15 R&D Projects in strategic areas

Sale of 25 LMT wheat to start from Feb 1 under Open Market Sale Scheme

EPFO launches 'Nidhi Aapke Nikat 2.0' - A District Outreach Program

Govt has so far repealed 2000 defunct laws: MoS

MeitY Secretary inaugurates PCB Recycling facility at Hyderabad
 
GUEST COLUMN
 

By Rajat Chhabra, Madhuri Kabra and Gagandeep Kaur

Indirect Tax: Expectations from Union Budget 2023

WITH general elections due in mid of 2024 and State elections in 2023, the Hon'ble Finance Minister has a daunting task of announcing Budget 2023, the last of NDA's full scale Budget in the incumbent regime, which ought to appeal populist agenda without losing fiscal prudence...

 
NOTIFICATION
 

ctariffadd23_002

Seeks to amend notification No. 43/2021-Customs(ADD) regarding levy of anti-dumping duty on Phthalic anhydride to amend the name of the producer from "Aekyung Petrochemical Co. Ltd." to "Aekyung Chemical Co., Ltd.".

 
INSTRUCTION
 

F.No.401/35/2022-Cus-III

Cancellation of swapping order w.r.t. 8th & 9th Reallocation of Export Quota for export during Sugar Season 2022-23 and holding of export quota

F.No. 401/66/2022-Cus-III

Amendment to Instruction No 18/2022-Customs dated 12.08.2022, Instruction No 30/2022-Customs dated 14.11.2022 and Instruction No 32/2022-Customs dated 28.11.2022 regarding extension of Requirement of Health Certificate accompanied with the import of food consignments

 
TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED.
TIOL HOUSE, 490, Udyog Vihar, Phase - V,
Gurgaon, Haryana - 122001, INDIA
Web: https://taxindiaonline.com
Email: updates@tiol.in
__________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY/PROPRIETARY NOTE.
The Document accompanying this electronic transmission contains information from TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED., which is confidential, proprietary or copyrighted and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, without limitation, displaying this transmission or any portion thereof, on any public bulletin board. If you are not the intended recipient of this document, please return this document to TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED. immediately