News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
GST - The Dual Control Duel - Power Distribution - Vertical or Horizontal Split?

DDT in Limca Book of Records - Third Time in a rowTIOL-DDT 2965
07 11 2016
Monday

THE GST Council had to adjourn without a decision on the administrative control issue. GST is supposed to be a combined levy by the States and the Centre, but the moot question is who will collect it? If both start collecting it jointly, what will happen to the poor assessee? How to share the power? 'How to share the tax', is no more an issue.

The ideas floating around was GST on goods upto 1.5 crore will be with the States - any way the Centre was not collecting excise duty on this small scale sector; dual control above 1.5 crore; GST on services with Centre; Audit with the States. But then there was a statistical disaster. The Centre was campaigning that there are 11 lakh service tax assessees which suddenly swelled up to 31 lakh just before the GST Council meeting. The States which had surrendered the power to tax were not prepared to abdicate the right to collect. The question was whether there should be a vertical or horizontal split of the assessee base. Finally, it may be a combination of vertical and horizontal split.

The whole problem boils down to the deployment of the army of taxmen at the Centre and the States. Even now, there is no clear idea as to how many taxmen we have in the States and the Centre. One estimate is about 60,000 Central Taxmen and some three lakh State tax officials. So, the States are not prepared for a fifty-fifty vertical split. And the Council Meeting could not arrive at a consensus and has been adjourned without a decision. Finance Minister Arun Jaitley announced that an informal meeting of the Finance Ministers (without officials) will be held on 20th to find a political solution to this economic problem. Political Science to aid in economic engineering?

GST - Capture by Central Bureaucracy

THE Kerala Finance Minister Thomas Isaac said,

Look at the way decisions have been made. The States giving up the rights to tax which is not a small thing. Or the rate structure, which has ideological connotations...many of these issues were settled on a spirit of give and take. And this comes to an organisational matter. The Centre has adopted an in transient attitude. It's a kind of capture by the central bureaucracy. I think it is very unfortunate. None of us thought this would come to such an impasse. It's a kind of stone-walling by the central government.  There is no question of many states, like Kerala, ever changing their position.

GST - Who Should Control - Why Not Seek Public Opinion

IF the Assessees are asked to choose from the following on who should have control over GST administration,

1. The Centre (CBEC)

2. The States (Commercial Taxes/VAT Departments)

3. Both 1 & 2

4. None of The Above

NOTA, (None of The Above) will be a clear winner. But you don't ask the victim's choice.

Do we need about 4 lakh employees to collect this entirely electronic based tax? Maybe we should create a new department of GST manned by officers who never had any experience in tax collecting. And perhaps they can create a new Indian GST Service (IGS).

But what do you do with this army of four lakh tax collectors? Pay them their salaries with an additional GST bonus and ask them all to stay away from GST. It is certainly not going to be a bad investment.

CBEC - Where is that Annual Return?

DURING the last week, we have been getting many mails and calls on the new return required to be filed by the assessees by 30th November. One of the mails:

Annual Return

Rule 12(2)(a) was amended vide NotiNo.8/2016 CE NT dated 1.3.2016. The words "Annual Financial statement" were substituted by "Annual Return".

CBEC has not yet specified the format for "Annual Return"

The format for ER-4 available in ACES for erstwhile ER-4 is not enabled for 2015-16.

In this situation if the assessee cannot file the "Annual Return" then whether it will be construed as "Non-compliance" of Excise Law? 

I asked Ms. Bhagya Devi, ADG, Systems of CBEC, "The Annual Return under Rule 12 of the CE Rules is to be filed by end of November. Has the Board notified the format? When is it going to be available in ACES?".

She replied, "Regarding the Annual Return under Rule 12 of the CE Rules the Board has not yet notified the return format. It will be made available in ACES if and when notified."

Thank you, madam, for the prompt response, but how long will the CBEC keep the assessees on tenterhooks?

GST - A tax reform, if not properly implemented, might lead to increased litigation - CBEC Commissioner

WHILE addressing a Seminar on "GST Implications- Industry Perspective: Gearing up for the change" organized by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) in New Delhi, Mr Sanjiv Srivastava, Commissioner, Central Excise, CBEC, said;

While the ultimate consumer is actually paying the tax under GST, industry is a part of the tax collection mechanism. To give way to a smooth and perfect GST, every link in the value chain and the supply chain has to work seamlessly, without any distortion.

A tax reform, if not properly implemented, might lead to increased litigation. Moreover, every sector of industry has different challenges and issues regarding the new regime. Making an amendment in the GST Law in India would be a difficult task since changes would be required in all State laws as well as the Central law. The Government is therefore targeting a unique tax system, which would take care of such issues without any detriment to revenue or to the industry.

GST - Enrolment of Existing Taxpayer on GST System Portal

THE Goa Commercial Taxes Department has issued an FAQ on 'Enrolment of the Existing Taxpayer on the GST System Portal'.

All existing taxpayers registered under

a. Central Excise

b. Service Tax

c. State Sales Tax / VAT (except exclusive liquor dealers if registered under VAT)

d. Entry Tax

e. Luxury Tax

f. Entertainment Tax (except levied by the local bodies)

are required to enrol into the new system as data available with various tax authorities is incomplete and thus fresh enrolment has been planned. Also, this will ensure latest data is available in GST Database without any recourse to amendment process, which is the norm to update the data under tax statutes today.

The Department has also prescribed the procedure for enrolment of existing VAT dealers on the GST System Portal. The online provisional registration on GST System Portal should be completed by all existing dealers between 14.11.2016 and 29.11.2016.

Goa Department of Commercial Taxes - FAQ on 'Enrolment of the Existing Taxpayer on the GST System Portal'

Goa Department of Commercial Taxes - procedure for enrolment of existing VAT dealers.

Preventive Vigilance as a management function - CBDT Chairman's letter to officers

THE CBDT Chairman, Mr. Sushil Chandra in a letter to all the Principal Chief Commissioners says,

This year Vigilance Awareness Week is being observed from 31st October to 5th November, 2016. Vigilance, however, is not a stand-alone activity and the focus on vigilance should not be limited to the duration of the Vigilance Awareness Week only. It is a management function to be exercised by all supervisory authorities for overall risk management in any organization. A supervisory officer cannot absolve himself from vicarious liability if the supervisor who has the right, ability or duty to control the activities of a subordinate does not take steps to prevent the acts of misdemeanour by the subordinate.

Rule 3(2)(i) of the CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964 mandates that every Government servant holding a supervisory post shall take all possible steps to ensure the integrity and devotion to duty of all Government servants for the time being under his control and authority. Therefore, it is necessary that Supervisory Officers conduct necessary checks so that officers and officials maintain absolute integrity and complete devotion to duty.

Inspections & reviews are important preventive vigilance functions and periodical inspections of the work of a subordinate can give timely alerts about any wrongdoing by officers. However, I am constrained to point out that the laid down procedure for conducting inspections/ reviews by the CCsIT, the CsIT and the Addl.CsIT is not being followed and only about 25% to 30% of the targeted inspections have been conducted in the past 2/3 years. I request you to give your immediate attention to this area and ensure that the targets and timelines in this regard are strictly adhered to. DDT

Any new initiatives/ ideas in the field of Preventive Vigilance may be shared with me by email on chairmancbdt@nic.in so that the same can be duly considered by the Board for replication in other Regions also.

CBDT Chairman's D.O. Letter F.No.DGIT(Vig.)/PV/2016-17/4559., Dated November 04, 2016

Until Tomorrow with more DDT

Have a nice day.

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@tiol.in


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: GST Control System,

Dear Sir,

The beest possible way is as under:-
1. GST will be excluded from CBEC and they should renamed for Customs & Narcotics purposes only.
2. GST work of CBEC under GST Council and officers on deputation as usual.
3. Audit work of CBEC shifted to CAG (Controller & Auditor General)who is the competent body for audit and Audit people deputed with CAG.
4. All GST collection work will be with State Govt and officer of CBEC deputed to
State VAT department for collection purposes. They will be rotated from Audit & Prevebtive section as per policy formulated.
5. As GST is based on IT infrastructure their is no harm giving collection to Stats who have no power to utilise the same as the same is deposited in GST accounts and GSTN distribute among states and Cental as per heading of accounts.
6. When Police, Land Revenue is withi state govt, why not GST for collection purposes.
Why not simple syatem will be made for this purposes.
Even today IAS & IPS & IFS are working under States why not GST people.
Although the same will be under States, but States have limited power in Administration and efficient process can be developed by this system.
Above are the thought process for further thinking on the matter.
Thanks,
S. P. Singh
Central Service Pool
CBEC GSTdesolved and all powers should be wasted in GST Councli, Customs &

Posted by SATYA PRAKASH SINGH
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.