Click here to view this Mail Update in your browser.
Like TIOL on Facebook Follow TIOL on TwitterSubscriber TIOL on YouTube

2023-TIOL-NEWS-243 Part 2 | October 17, 2023

Dear Member,

Sending following links.

Warm Regards,
TIOL Content Team


TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED.

For assistance please call us at + 91 7838594749 or email us at helpdesk@tiol.in.
TIOL Mail Update
 
TIOL Tax Congress 2023
 
TODAY'S CASE (DIRECT TAX)

I-T - Variable annual licence fee paid to Dept of Telecom under new Telecom Policy of 1999 are capital in nature and may be amortised u/s 35AB: SC

 
INCOME TAX

2023-TIOL-146-SC-IT

CIT Vs Bharti Hexacom Ltd

Whether the annual variable licence fee paid to the Government on revenue sharing basis under Telecom Policy of 1999 is capital in nature - YES: SC

Whether payment of entry fee as well as the variable annual licence fee paid by the respondents-assessees to the DoT under the Policy of 1999 are capital in nature and may be amortised in accordance with Section 35ABB - YES: SC

Whether mere payment of an amount in instalments does not convert or change a capital payment into a revenue payment, and similarly, lumpsum payment can represent revenue expenditure if it is incurred for acquiring circulating capital though payment is made once and for all - YES: SC

Whether what is relevant is the nature of the original obligation and whether the subsequent payment made in instalments relates to or has a nexus with such original obligation or not - YES: SC

- Revenue's appeal allowed: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

2023-TIOL-1349-ITAT-DEL

Raj Kumar Karanwal Vs Pr.CIT

Whether revision order passed by PCIT is unsustainable when PCIT failed to point out what enquiries or verification should have been made but had not been made by the AO- YES: ITAT

- Assessee's appeal alllowed: DELHI ITAT

2023-TIOL-1348-ITAT-DEL

ACIT Vs Shiva Mint Industries

Whether manufacturing expenses claimed by the assessee have to be allowed when once the purchases are held to be genuine - YES: ITAT

- Revenue's appeal dismissed: DELHI ITAT

2023-TIOL-1347-ITAT-DEL

Anjali Bhadoo Vs ITO

Whether the agreement for sale can be construed as agreement of construction when assessee fulfils the conditions laid down under section 54(1)- YES

- Assessee's appeal allowed: DELHI ITAT

2023-TIOL-1346-ITAT-MAD

S Tulasidoss Nedunselian Vs ACIT

Whether AO erred in making an addition towards cash deposits u/s 69A of the Act when assessee has filed necessary evidences to prove nature and source for cash deposits to bank account - YES: ITAT

- Assessee's appeal allowed: CHENNAI ITAT

2023-TIOL-1345-ITAT-AHM

Gujarat Council Of Science City Vs DCIT

Whether assessee advancing general public utility can engage itself in any trade, commerce or business, or provide service in relation thereto for any consideration - NO: ITAT

- Assessee's appeal allowed: AHMEDABAD ITAT

 
TODAY'S CASE (INDIRECT TAX)

CX - Flue gas generated during manufacture of metallurgical coke, is not a manufactured product and is also not marketable, same cannot be classified as Nitrogen: CESTAT

 
INDIRECT TAX

2023-TIOL-1317-HC-AHM-CUS

Mumtazbibi Yusufkhan Rangawala Vs UoI

Cus - The prayer in this petition is that the impugned orders rejecting declaration of petitioner under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, is set aside - In case of a main noticee M/S Sunshine Corporation, application was filed wherein this Court by an order dated 01.02.2022, the petition has been allowed with certain directions - Revenue files an affidavit which indicates that in light of directions issued by this Court in the order dated 01.02.2022, case of petitioner shall also be considered on same lines and in light of directions issued therein - Since the petitioner is a co-noticee thereof the benefit of judgment of this Court and directions issued therein shall apply to case of petitioner - The impugned orders therefore are quashed and set aside: HC

- Petition allowed: GUJARAT HIGH COURT

2023-TIOL-1316-HC-AHM-CX

Jaisal Silk Mills Pvt Ltd Vs CCE & CGST

CX - Appeal filed under Section 35G of CEA, 1944 raising substantial questions of law that whether Tribunal has committed substantial error of law by not considering judgements regarding grant of cross-examination and interpretation of section 9D of Central Excise Act, 1944 by jurisdictional High Court and other High courts in India - The Tribunal in its order observed that Commissioner has passed impugned common orders on the basis of common findings without discussing the submission separately of each Appellant and their involvement - Therefore, entire matter needs to be reconsidered by adjudicating authority - Adjudicating authority is directed to decide the matter afresh and pass the order accordingly - The Tribunal by the impugned order has only remanded the matter directing the authority to decide the matter afresh - No question of law found muchless substantial question of law arising in present appeal: HC

- Appeal dismissed: GUJARAT HIGH COURT

2023-TIOL-935-CESTAT-KOL

Tata Steel Ltd Vs CCE

CX - The appellant is engaged in manufacturing of metallurgical coke - The coke so manufactured is cleared to Tata Steel Ltd., Jamshedpur, who use it in blast furnace for manufacturing steel - Revenue views that the flue gas generated and cleared to Tata Power Company Ltd. (TPCL) by classifying the flue gas as 'Nitrogen' - As appellant is engaged in manufacture of flue gas, a SCN was issued to appellant by invoking extended period of limitation alleging that as per agreement with TPCL flue gas is being sold, hence, it can be said to marketable since it is capable of being bought and sold - It is a fact that flue gas is generated during manufacturing of coke - It is not manufactured by appellant, but it is a waste gas which arises inevitably without beyond the control of appellant - Merely this flue gas has been sold by appellant in terms of agreement with TPCL, it does not make it marketable as held by Apex Court in case of Hindustan Zinc Ltd. 2005-TIOL-39-SC-CX-LB , wherein it has been held that burden of proof that the product is marketable is on the revenue to prove that the flue gas in question is a marketable product - There is no market enquiry conducted by revenue to hold that the gas in question is marketable and freely be sold, therefore, revenue has failed to prove the test of marketability - Merely because it is having contents more than 80% v/v, it cannot be said that said gas is Nitrogen gas by applying rule 3(b) of General Rules of Interpretation without any evidence - In absence of any evidence produced on record that the flue gas can be sold in market as Nitrogen, same cannot be classified as Nitrogen - Flue gas generated during manufacture of metallurgical coke, is not a manufactured product and is also not marketable, same cannot be classified as Nitrogen: CESTAT

- Appeal allowed: KOLKATA CESTAT

 

 

Download on the App Store
Get it on Google play

 


NEWS FLASH
 

India to have own Space Station by 2035; to send astronaut to moon by 2040

IIM-Mumbai fixes fees at Rs 21 lakh for MBA

Same-sex marriage - SC leaves controversial issue for Legislature to decide

11 Palestinian journalists killed in Gaza

 
TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED.
TIOL HOUSE, 490, Udyog Vihar, Phase - V,
Gurgaon, Haryana - 122001, INDIA
Web: https://taxindiaonline.com
Email: updates@tiol.in
__________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY/PROPRIETARY NOTE.
The Document accompanying this electronic transmission contains information from TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED., which is confidential, proprietary or copyrighted and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, without limitation, displaying this transmission or any portion thereof, on any public bulletin board. If you are not the intended recipient of this document, please return this document to TIOL PRIVATE LIMITED. immediately
Click here to view this Mail Update in your browser.