News Update

Another quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
IT - Appeal - HC Can frame question other than one on which appeal is admitted

¶DDTTIOL-DDT 2068
19.03.2013
Tuesday

RECENTLY in a Revenue SLP, the Supreme Court observed, ¶We are afraid that the Revenue is under some misconception. The proviso following the main provision of Section 260A(4) of the Act states that nothing stated in sub-section (4), i.e., 'The appeal shall be heard only on the question so formulated' shall be deemed to take away or abridge the power of the Court to hear, for reasons to be recorded, the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it, if it is satisfied that the case involves such question.

The High Court's power to frame substantial question(s) of law at the time of hearing of the appeal other than the questions on which appeal has been admitted remains under Section 260A(4). This power is subject, however, to two conditions, (one) the Court must be satisfied that appeal involves such questions, and (two) the Court has to record reasons therefor.

The High Court's power to frame a question is not fettered and in this the Direct and Indirect Taxes laws are almost identical. See the comparison between the Income Tax Act and Central Excise Act:

Income Tax Act (SECTION 260A)

Central Excise Act (SECTION 35G)

(1) An appeal shall lie to the High Court from every order passed in appeal by the Appellate Tribunal, if the High Court is satisfied that the case involves a substantial question of law.

(3) Where the High Court is satisfied that a substantial question of law is involved in any case, it shall formulate that question.

(4) The appeal shall be heard only on the question so formulated, and the respondents shall at the hearing of the appeal, be allowed to argue that the case does not involve such question :

Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall be deemed to take away or abridge the power of the Court to hear, for reasons to be recorded, the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it, if it is satisfied that the case involves such question.

(6) The High Court may determine any issue which -

(a) Has not been determined by the Appellate Tribunal : or

(b) Has been wrongly determined by the Appellate Tribunal, by reason of a decision on such question of law as is referred to in sub-section (1)

(1) An appeal shall lie to the High Court from every order passed in appeal by the Appellate Tribunal xxxxxx if the High Court is satisfied that the case involves a substantial question of law.

(3) Where the High Court is satisfied that a substantial question of law is involved in any case, it shall formulate that question.

(4) The appeal shall be heard only on the question so formulated, and the respondents shall, at the hearing of the appeal, be allowed to argue that the case does not involve such question :

Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall be deemed to take away or abridge the power of the Court to hear, for reasons to be recorded, the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it, if it is satisfied that the case involves such question.

(6) The High Court may determine any issue which -

(a) has not been determined by the Appellate Tribunal; or

(b) has been wrongly determined by the Appellate Tribunal, by reason of a decision on such question of law as is referred to in sub-section (1).

Please see 2013-TIOL-20-SC-IT

MoF Releases Outcome Budget 2013-14

ACCORDING to the Preface of the Outcome Budget 2013-14, released yesterday, the ¶Outcome Budget¶ reflects the endeavour of the Government to convert ¶Outlays¶ into ¶Outcomes¶ by planning expenditure, fixing appropriate targets and quantifying deliverables of each scheme. The ¶Outcome Budget¶ is an effort of the Government to be transparent and accountable to the people.

INDIRECT TAXES:

CBEC functions with 94 Commissionerates of Central Excise, 35 Commissionerates of Customs and 6 Commissionerates of Service Tax. In its functioning, the Board is assisted by the following attached/subordinate offices:-

i. Directorate of Central Excise Intelligence

ii. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

iii. Directorate of Inspection

iv. Directorate of Human Resource Development

v. National Academy of Customs, Excise and Narcotics

vi. Directorate of Vigilance

vii. Directorate of Systems

viii. Directorate of Data Management

ix. Directorate of Audit

x. Directorate of Safeguards

xi. Directorate of Export Promotion

xii. Directorate of Service Tax

xiii. Directorate of Valuation

xiv. Directorate of Publicity and Public Relations

xv. Directorate of Logistics

xvi. Directorate of Legal Affairs

xvii. Office of Chief Departmental Representative

xviii. Central Revenues Control Laboratory

Have you heard of Help Centres?: The Outcome Budget says, ¶The opening of the Help Centres since July 2005 at all Customs and Central Excise Zones is a pioneering venture in public private partnership in the sovereign function of tax collection. These centres provide an institutional mechanism for small tax payers, assessees, importers, exporters and service providers in the form of guidance and education to them.¶ Maybe the FM is not aware that all the help centres opened with much fanfare have been silently buried.

Cost of Collection: Cost of collection of Customs duty is 0.67% and for Central Excise and Service Tax, it is 0.96%. Each employee in the Department on an average is responsible for collecting a Revenue of Rs. 7.31 Crores while his salary is on an average 5.68 Lakhs.

A Department that does not spend its money: Out of the Rs. 3386.39 crores sanctioned to the Department, they could spend only Rs. 3241crores surrendering nearly 150 Crores. NACEN had an unspent amount of Rs. 2.61 crores and even the Holy Directorate of Systems could not spend about 3.9 crores.

The Department has a work force of 53,458 officers and staff, of which 30.97% are gazetted officers and the remaining are non-gazetted employees.

DIRECT TAXES:

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), created by the Central Boards of Revenue Act 1963, is the apex body engaged in the administration of Direct Taxes in India viz. income tax, corporation tax, wealth tax, etc. It consists of a Chairman and six members. It is the cadre controlling authority for the Income Tax Department. It employs a workforce of 41684 officers and staff, of which approximately 27.35% are Gazetted officers in Groups ‘A' and ‘B' categories and the remaining are non Gazetted employees in Groups ‘C' and ‘D' categories.

CBDT is assisted by the following Directorates:

(i) Directorate of Income Tax (Public Relations, Printing, Publication and Official Languages)

(ii) Directorate of Income Tax (Recovery)

(iii) Directorate of Income Tax (Audit)

(iv) Directorate of Income Tax (Income Tax)

(v) Directorate of Income Tax (Organization and Management Services)

(vi) Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)

(vii) Directorate of Income Tax (Investigations)

(viii) Directorate of Income Tax (Vigilance)

(ix) Directorate of Income Tax (Exemption)

(x) Directorate of Income Tax (Legal & Research)

(xi) Directorate of Income Tax (International Taxation)

(xii) Directorate of Income Tax (Infrastructure)

(xiii) Directorate of Income Tax (Tax Deduction at Source)

(xiv) Directorate of Income Tax (Human Resources Development)

(xv) Directorate of Income Tax (Business Process Reengineering)

(xvi) Directorate of Income Tax (Intelligence & Criminal Investigation)

(xvii) Directorate of Income Tax (Expenditure Budget)

E-Filing: In the year 2012-13, upto December 2012, 147.51 lakhs e-returns have been filed. The Centralised Processing Centre (CPC) at Bangalore processed 1,12,87,911 returns in this financial year up to December 2012. CPC has achieved a peak processing capacity of 1.79 Lac returns per day.

Payment of direct taxes through ATMs: The facility has been introduced by 13 selected banks both Public and Private Sector. This facility is being expanded.

They too don't spend: The Income Tax Department, last year could spend only Rs. 3239.85 crore out of the Rs. 3897.27 sanctioned, surrendering 657 crores.

FORM 26AS

- This facility of viewing 26AS statements is available online on internet to the taxpayers. The 26AS Scheme has a potential to reduce the mis-match as the taxpayer is now aware of the gaps in the tax credit and, therefore, he facilitates the department by chasing the deductor to comply.

- In order to eliminate TDS mismatch, CBDT has issued a circular through which all Deductors have to mandatorily download Form 16A from the TIN portal.

- This also gives information about Refunds Paid, AIR Information like investment in shares, mutual funds etc. and details of TDS deducted as well as deposited. In this way the assesse can verify his details.

Prevention of corruption Act - Arrest of and investigation against CCE - Joint Secretary cadre officer - No sanction required: HC

CENTRAL Excise Commissioner Dr.Anup Kumar Srivastava was arrested by CBI in Delhi on 13th January 2012 in a bribery case. He has challenged the taking cognizance of the offence and all investigation and judicial proceedings on the ground that he being a Joint Secretary level officer of the Central Government, no enquiry or investigation could be initiated against him for an offence falling under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) without the previous approval of the Central Government. He pleaded that despite the fact that he brought to the notice of the CBI, even prior to his arrest, that the approval under Section 6(A) of the DSPE Act was mandatory, the CBI in complete violation of the DSPE Act continued with the investigation and filed the charge-sheet. Even if the contention of the CBI was to be accepted that the time was short and they had to lay a trap to catch a public servant red-handed as per the CBI Crime Manual, the CBI could have taken the necessary approval before the arrest of the Petitioner even after start of investigation.

The Delhi High Court last week dismissed his petition holding that in this case, no sanction was required.

Please see 2013-TIOL-208-HC-MISC

IRS Probationers call on President

PROBATIONERS of the 66th Batch of Indian Revenue Service (Income Tax) called on the President of India, yesterday (March 18, 2013) at Rashtrapati Bhavan. These officers are undergoing sixteen month training at an induction training programme in the National Academy of Direct Taxes, Nagpur.

¶Legal

Speaking on the occasion, the President said that the structural changes of the Indian economy and its integration with the world economy have brought new challenges to the tax administration. He advised the officer trainees that to face these challenges of complexity, they need to equip themselves with the domestic taxation laws as well as international business laws. He asked them to continuously update themselves with the changes in the domestic as well as international laws.

The President said that good governance is the key for the development of the nation. Ensuring inclusive growth, eradication of poverty, empowerment of people and creation of a just society are some of the challenges, which need to be addressed.

The 66th batch of IRS probationers, with a mix of urban and rural background, has representation from 19 States and 1 Union Territory. It comprises of 105 officers of which 29 are ladies.

Jurisprudentiol – Wednesday's cases

¶LegalService Tax

CENVAT credit eligibility is to be determined with reference to taxability of service on date of receipt of capital goods - CESTAT

THE issue involved is regarding eligibility of CENVAT credit on Air Compressors purchased and received in the factory premises on 05/05/2005.The appellant was providing the following service viz. ¶Commercial and Industrial Construction Services (Pipeline Services)¶ which were brought into the tax net from 16.6.2005.

The adjudicating authority held that the CENVAT credit could not be availed of the duty paid on such Air Compressors though it is capital goods as the said capital goods were received in the premises of the service provider i.e. respondent before the services were held to be taxable under the Finance Act, 1994.The first appellate authority after considering the submissions set-aside the O-in-O and held in favour of the assessee.So, now the Revenue is aggrieved and is before the CESTAT.

Income Tax

Whether when assessee requests other companies to pay for scientific research and makes payment to them in subsequent year but claims deduction in return, such benefits u/s 35(1)(ii) can be denied by Revenue - NO: HC

THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when assessee requests other companies to pay for scientific research and makes payment to them in the subsequent year but claims deduction in return, such benefits u/s 35(1)(ii) can be denied by Revenue; Whether deduction sought in respect of the expenses made towards designing and lay out as well as other temporary partition and construction made for making the office functional is capital in nature; Whether when the assessee is in negotiations with the parties in respect of consultancy charges and professional fees, for reducing them, and finality on the quantum could not be reached even at the time of closing the accounts, whether the assessee is entitled to make a provision for the same based on the original claims made by those parties and Whether provision can be made for the entire amount of liability, although it is contingent in nature and negotiations are ongoing with the third party. And the verdict goes against the Revenue.

Central Excise

Digital Local Telephone Exchange Equipment (DLTEE) System assembled by BSNL is leviable to excise duty under CETH 85.17 -demand on BSNL upheld.:CESTAT

THE dispute is whether the Digital Local Telephone Exchange Equipment (DLTEE) assembled by BSNL with the various components supplied by the vendors would amount to manufacture, whether such goods are excisable, marketable and are chargeable to central excise duty. This case perhaps will have wide ramifications, as BSNL might be assembling such systems at many places. The appellants (BSNL) argued against the demand on various grounds, but the Tribunal held that the resultant assembly is goods, excisable and marketable and upheld the demand.

See our Columns Tomorrow for the judgements

Until Tomorrow with more DDT

Have a Nice Day

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@taxindiaonline.com

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.