News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
GST on Supply of goods while same are in Customs Bonded Warehouse – Part III

 

FEBRUARY 05, 2018

By G Mohana Rao, Assistant Commissioner (Retd.)

THE following two earlier articles penned by me on the above subject refers –

GST on supply of goods while same are in Customs Bonded Warehouse - Part I

GST on supply of goods while same are in Customs Bonded Warehouse - Part II

There are numerous articles written on the subject by many others as well. It was felt that the issue could not be resolved simply by resorting to circulars. Now, the government has rightly proposed change in the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 through the Finance Bill presented on 1 st February 2018. Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is proposed to be amended by way of insertion of two sub-sections 8A and 10A so as to provide for value of goods when they are sold within the warehousing period for calculation of Integrated tax and Compensation Cess respectively. This is expected to pave way for the solution of the problem. The new subsection could provide for different values for payment of Integrated tax and Compensation Cess when the warehoused goods are sold. The proposed sub-section 8A to Section 3 is reproduced below:

'(8A) Where the goods deposited in a warehouse under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 are sold to any person before clearance for home consumption or export under the said Act, the value of such goods for the purpose of calculating the integrated tax under sub-section (7) shall be, -

(a) where the whole of the goods are sold, the value determined under sub-section (8) or the transaction value of such goods, whichever is higher; or

(b) where any part of the goods is sold, the proportionate value of such goods as determined under sub-section (8) or the transaction value of such goods, whichever is higher:

Provided that where the whole of the warehoused goods or any part thereof are sold more than once before such clearance for home consumption or export, the transaction value of the last such transaction shall be the transaction value for the purposes of clause (a) or clause (b):

Provided further that in respect of warehoused goods which remain unsold, the value or the proportionate value, as the case may be, of such goods shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (8).

Explanation. –– For the purposes of this sub-section, the expression "transaction value", in relation to warehoused goods, means the amount paid or payable as consideration for the sale of such goods.';

Sub-section 10A is basically a reproduction of sub-section 8A above inserted for the purpose of determining value for calculating Compensation Cess.

The Importer deposits goods in Customs Bonded warehouse in order to defer the duty only. Therefore, in such a case of warehoused goods being sold, the importer should not be asked to pay any duty at this point of time of warehousing. The time of supply for this supply should only be at the time when he clears the goods from Customs Bonded warehouse.

The importer, on clearing the goods from Customs Bonded warehouse will have to pay the requisite Customs duty, Integrated tax and compensation Cess. No GST need to be paid on the sale while the goods are in customs bonded warehouse. In this way, the government will not lose the revenue on the difference value received by the importer and the buyer will also not be paying double tax of IGST. The probabilities of ITC shopping by shifting ITC without economic value shifting to buyer also get diminished.

The circular No. 46/2017-Customs dated 24th November 2017 (amended on 6th December, 2017) will need to be suitably amended or rescinded.

I hope this step of solving the issue by way of amending the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is a step in the right direction and may set the issue to rest.

(The author is Managing Partner, Elysian Tax Advisors, Mumbai and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.