News Update

ST - Amendment made to FA, 1994 on 14.05.2015 making service tax applicable retrospectively on chit-fund business is only prospective - Refund payable of tax paid between 01.07.2012 to 13.05.2015: HCST - SVLDRS, 2019 - Amnesty Scheme, being of the nature of an exemption from the requirement to pay the actual tax due to the government, have to be considered strictly in favour of the revenue: HCCX - Issue involved is valuation of goods u/r 10A of CE Valuation Rules, 2000 - Appeal lies before Supreme Court: HCCus - Smuggling - A person carrying any article on his belonging would be presumed to be aware of the contents of the articles being carried by him: HCCus - Penalty that could be imposed for smuggling 3.2 kg of gold was Rs.88.40 lakhs, being the value of gold, but what is imposed is Rs.10 lakhs - Penalty not at all disproportionate: HCCus - Keeping in mind the balance of convenience and irreparable injury which may be caused to Revenue, importer to continue indemnity bond of 115 crore and possession of confiscated diamonds to remain with department: HCCus - OIA was passed in October 2022 remanding the matter to adjudicating authority but matter not yet disposed of - Six weeks' time granted to dispose proceedings: HCI-T - High Court need not intervene in matter involving factual issues; petitioner may utilise option of appeal: HCChina asks Blinken to select between cooperation or confrontationI-T - Unexplained cash credit - additions u/s 68 unsustainable where based on conjecture & surmise alone: ITATHonda to set up USD 11 bn EV plant in CanadaI-T - Re-assessment is invalid where based only on a suspicion that income escaped assessment & where not based on concrete reasons to believe for commencing such proceedings : ITATImran Khan banned from flaying State InstitutionsI-T - Income from sale of flats cannot be computed in assessee's hands, where legal possession of flats had not been handed over to buyers in that particular AY: ITATPro-Palestine demonstration spreads across US universities; 100 arrestedI-T - Investment activities in venture capital which are not covered in negative list under Schedule III to SEBI Regulations, qualifies for deduction u/s 10(23FB): ITATNATO asks China to stop backing Russia if keen to forge close ties with WestCus - When Department has not complied with time limit, the order issued for revocation of licence or order issued for continuation of suspension licence cannot sustain: CESTATNY top court quashes conviction of Harvey Weinstein in rape caseWeather prediction normal for phase 2 poll dayIndiGo orders 30 Airbus A350s for long haulsST - Appellant is an 'authorised medical practitioner' providing 'healthcare services' - services exempted in terms of clause 2(i) of notification 25/2012-ST: Commr(A)RBI to issue fresh guidelines for banks to freeze suspected bank accounts being used for cyber crimesREC avails SACE-Covered Green Loan for 60.5 Billion Japanese YenStudy finds Coca-Cola accounts for 11% of branded plastic pollution worldwideCus - 'Small Form-factor Pluggable Optical Transceivers' are classifiable under CTH 8517 7090 and not under CTH 8517 62 90 - entitled for benefit of duty concession under 57/2017-Cus: CESTATDoNER discusses Development of Tourism in North EastCX - Appellant is eligible for exemption under Notfn 12/2012-CE upon fulfilling all conditions stipulated therein, thus sufficiently establishing that goods dealt with by Appellants qualify for exemption: CESTAT
 
Anti Dumping Duty on zinc oxide extended - another forgotten notification?

TIOL-DDT 609
09.05.2007
Wednesday

The anti-dumping duty on Zinc Oxide originating in, or exported from, the Peoples Republic of China, was first imposed by notification No. 115/2001 dated the 2nd November, 2001, which was further extended till 8.4.2007 by Notification No. 51/2006 -Customs dated the 29th May, 2006

The Designated Authority, on review, has recommended continued imposition of the anti-dumping duty against the subject goods, originating in, or exported from, the Peoples Republic of China in order to remove injury to the domestic industry and so the Government has now re-imposed anti dumping duty on the product for another five years from 7.5.2007.

But what happens to the imports during the period, 9.4.2007 to 6.5.2007, when there was no anti dumping duty on the product?. The Designated Authority had recommended continuation of the anti dumping duty, not its re- imposition. This should have been done before 8.4.2007, but somebody was sleeping for a month and just woke up and issued the notification after a month!

The Board should have a cell just to monitor the expiry dates of its notifications, so that, if necessary, they can be extended before they die.

NOTIFICATION NO. 64/2007-Cus., Dated: May 7, 2007

What is happening to Education Cess?

The amount collected through the Education Cess for the years 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07 (up to February, 2007) is (Rs.incrore)

Financial Year

Direct Taxes

Indirect Taxes

2004-05

1804.51

2514

2005-06

3213.75

4424

2006-07(uptoFeb.07)

2982.00

3851

The proceeds of Education Cess utilized exclusively for the Sarva ShikshaAbhiyan (SSA) and Mid-Day Meal Scheme (MDM) of the Government after exhausting the funds provided to these schemes by way of Gross Budgetary Support (GBS) Allocations to States are not being made separately against the Education Cess. Financial assistance to them is released under individual schemes of SSA & MDM related to Elementary Education in accordance with the guidelines of such schemes and against their respective budgetary allocations.

This information was given by the Minister of State for Human Resource Development, Shri M.A.A. Fatmi in a written reply in the LokSabha yesterday.

Department’s Stay petition – Why?

An Assistant Commissioner passes an order confirming Central Excise duty demanded in the Show Cause Notice. The most normal thing to happen! On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals), quashes the order of the Assistant Commissioner. The Department appeals to the Tribunal and also files a stay petition. What is the effect of the stay petition?

The Tribunal recently in 2007-TIOL-606-CESTAT-MUM, held,

if the operation of the impugned order is stayed it would enable the department to recover the confirmed demand from the assessee, which cannot be normally ordered.

But has not the order of the Assistant Commissioner merged with that of the Commissioner (Appeals)? So if the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) is stayed, there is still no order to enforce. So the Departmental stay petitions are really an exercise in futility. But why are still stay petitions filed by the Department? There seems to be a strong urge to help the consultants collect some fees! Most often, the Department works overtime to help the consultants.

ISRO required to pay Service Tax?

Is ISRO required to pay Service Tax on Satellite launches?

On 23rd April 2007, India entered the global commercial launch market with ISRO's workhorse launch vehicle PSLV-C8 successfully placing the 352-kg Italian astronomical satellite AGILE into orbit after lift off from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre here on Monday.

¶It is a 100 per cent success to the entire ISRO community. We have made a good entry into the launch business and hope we will have more opportunities in the near future,¶ a beaming ISRO Chairman G Madhavan Nair said.

As per newspaper reports ISRO charged Rs.49crores for launching the satellite. Will this “service” be charged to Service Tax under the category BAS/Business Support Services or will a new category be required?

Film makers show case brands in films – Sale of space or time for advertisement – Service Tax payable?

Well known brands of cosmetics, mobile phones, cars, tyres, beverages are being promoted in films by film producers/directors and they charge these companies for the exposure their products get in the films. The latest film “Metro” promoting Shaadi.com, the matrimonial portal is an example in this regard. Similarly, Ta Ra Rum Pum promotes General motors. Aren’t these subject to service tax?

Ill gotten wealth – place of earning not relevant for jurisdiction – Customs Commissioner facing prosecution

A Customs Commissioner is charged by CBI of amassing wealth disproportionate to his known sources of income. A case is filed in a Delhi Court. He challenges the jurisdiction of Delhi Court and the case reaches the Supreme Court which says that where he amassed his wealth is not really relevant and in any case he had a house in Delhi which earned him rent.

V K Puri, a 1976 batch officer of Indian Customs and Central Excise Service, is charged with amassing properties around the country which were far in excess of his known sources of income.

The investigating officers, according to the chargesheet, worked out that his earning in the entire service period along with rents and interests could not be more than Rs 34 lakh.

Puri owned a plot of land with a double-storeyed house on it in Dehradun, a big flat in Delhi’s SaritaVihar, a plot of land in Indore, another plot in Bangalore apart from bank deposits and investments in his and other family members’ names.

Investigations revealed that Puri, a resident of Dehra Dun, inherited along with his brother and two sisters a house in that city. His assets grew remarkably during his Indore posting in 1988.

Explaining his acquisition of wealth, Puri and his wife furnished photocopies of 86 bills showing apparent sale of gold jewellery and silver utensils to Shree AmbikaJewellers to the tune of Rs 87 lakh between 1992 and 1995.

Wherever the Puris had stayed during this period, they went to the small shop in Indore to sell their family silver and gold.

The investigators said that the ingenious gold selling ploy had almost foxed them. However, further probe revealed that the Puris had never filed any wealth or gift tax returns or made any declaration under the Gold Control Act about the jewellery they sold. Neither had the jewellery shop reported it to the tax authorities.

The CBI officials pointed out in the charge sheet that Shree AmbikaJewellers ¶is a very small firm dealing in artificial diamonds, silver, stone jewellery, and had never dealt in the sale or purchase of gold jewellery or silver utensils¶.

Inspector Suman Kumar, who cracked the disproportionate assets case against Commissioner Puri, was awarded the CBI Gold Medal for Best Investigating officer for 2002 by the Prime Minister.

Picking up a clue from a bank account, Inspector Suman Kumar gathered information that Puri had deposited money in 170 accounts in 50 branches of 21 banks in five cities. He had also invested in immovable assets in Mumbai, Indore, Pune, Dehradun and Lucknow.

See our Breaking News for the Supreme Court order.

Refund of Service Tax on exports – Notification soon

The Foreign Trade Policy had announced that Service Tax on exports would be exempted/refunded. We in TIOL had pointed out that this has to be done by the Finance Ministry and not Commerce Ministry. But the Commerce Secretary seems to be confident. He has announced in a meeting yesterday that the notification on refund of service tax on exports at post production stage would come in the next couple of weeks.

“The notification will have the list of services on which tax would be refunded and the means of how it would be done,” he is reported to have said.

No immediate interim relief for Central Staff

The terms of Reference of the Sixth Pay Commission include examination of desirability and the need to sanction any interim relief till the time the recommendations of the Commission are made and accepted by the Government.The Government will take a decision on grant of interim relief to Central Government employees, after a recommendation in this regard is received from the Pay Commission.

This was informed to the RajyaSabhaby Pawan Kumar Bansal, Minister of State for Finance, yesterday.

Shake up in CBEC – New Chairman and mass transfer of Commissioners

The Government is likely to announce the name of the new CBEC Chairman today and most probably a massive order of transfer of Commissioners is also to be announced today or in the next couple of days. Watch our columns.

Until tomorrow with more DDT

Have a nice day.

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@taxindiaonline.com

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.