News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
Service Tax - services relating to transmission & distribution of electricity - retrospectively exempted by Notification No. 45/2010 - Services provided to electricity distribution companies not taxable: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

BANGALORE, FEB 06, 2014: AT the stage of disposal of the stay application, having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, with the consent of both sides appeal taken up for final disposal.

The petitioner provided a raft of taxable services to the Central Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh and other State distribution companies. Among the taxable services provided were

1. 'management, maintenance or repair service' involving manning and maintenance of sub-stations;

2. 'erection, commissioning or installation service' for erection of electrical lines of different capacities and transport of material from one location to another including - erection of sub-stations and allied services;

3. transport of goods by road for transport of failed/repaired transformers and other material of the distribution companies;

4.  rent-a-cab operator service, provided to the distribution companies for transport of their personnel;

5.  Business Auxiliary Service by establishing' Customer Service Centres on behalf of distribution companies; and

6.  'manpower recruitment and supply agency service', by supply of semi-skilled labour for attending to maintenance works in the sub-divisions of the distribution companies.

The singular defence urged by the appellant before the adjudicating authority was that these services were provided to instrumentalities of the State; no service tax was collected; as and when the service tax component is remitted by the service recipients, the appellant would remit the service tax

The Tribunal found this defence as fundamentally misconceived and rightly negated by the adjudicating authority.

It was however brought to the notice of the Tribunal that the Central Government by Notification No. 45/2010-ST dt. 20/07/2010, in exercise of powers conferred by Section 11 C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, granted immunity from the liability to remit service tax in respect of any taxable service provided in relation to transmission and distribution of electricity, during the period upto 26/02/2010.

The Notification reads as:

Whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that a practice was generally prevalent regarding levy of service tax (including non-levy thereof), under section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994) (hereinafter referred to as ‘ the Finance Act'), on all taxable services relating to transmission and distribution of electricity provided by a person (hereinafter called ‘ the service provider') to any other person (hereinafter called ‘ the service receiver'), and that all such services were liable to service tax under the said Finance Act, which were not being levied according to the said practice during the period up to 26th day of February, 2010 for all taxable services relating to transmission of electricity, and the period up to 21st day of June, 2010 for all taxable services relating to distribution of electricity;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 11C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), read with section 83 of the said Finance Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the service tax payable on said taxable services relating to transmission and distribution of electricity provided by the service provider to the service receiver, which was not being levied in accordance with the said practice, shall not be required to be paid in respect of the said taxable services relating to transmission and distribution of electricity during the aforesaid period.

The Tribunal held, "As consequence of this immunity Notification, the service tax liability of the petitioner for the several taxable services provided to electricity distribution companies of Andhra Pradesh during 01/04/2004 to 30/11/2009, stands eclipsed. On this premise, the appeal requires to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. The impugned adjudication order dt. 20/04/2011 is declared inoperative in the light of Notification No. 45/2010- ST dt. 20/07/2010."

(See 2014-TIOL-187-CESTAT-BANG)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.