News Update

Viksit Bharat @2047: Taxes form the BedrockGST - April month collections go past Rs 2 lakh crore threshold - peak to Rs 2.1 lakh croreCX - Alleged clandestine removal - Not replying to SCN on the ground that letter is not furnished by department is only a ruse as reliance is not placed on the same by the respondent authority for adjudicating the SCNs: SCGST - Proper officer observes that the reply filed is not satisfactory and since the assessee has nothing more to say, demand is confirmed - Officer has not applied his mind - Matter remitted: HCGST - Petitioner had no opportunity to even object to the retrospective cancellation of registration - Petitioner does not seek to continue his business and has sought cancellation of registration - Order modified accordingly: HCGST - Seizing the outward movement of funds from petitioner's bank account - Life of an order of provisional attachment u/s 83(2) is only one year - HDFC Bank, henceforth, cannot restrain operation of bank account: HCTax - on Death and ContemplationDelhi, Noida schools receive bomb threats; Children sent back homeI-T- Writ court is not required to interfere with assessment order, where assessee also has available option of statutory appeal: HCED seizes Rs 90 Cr stored in crypto in Gaming App scamI-T-Transfer of assessment is sustained, where assessee does not reply to any notice issued in this regard & where valid reasons exist for transferring assessment: HCHM appeals Naxalism will be erased in 2 yrs if Modi voted back to powerI-T - For assessment to be re-opened, it is required that AO should have reason to believe that income of assessee had escaped assessment and said belief should be honest & reasonable: ITATAmerica softens offence related to use of marijuanaI-T - If there was no delay in filing appeal, then no application seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal was filed by assessee: ITATCanada opposition leader calls Trudeau a ‘Wacko’I-T - Rule 11UA does not mentions pre-condition of approval of balance sheet by Annual General Meeting: ITATBinance former CEO jailed for 4 months in money-laundering violationsI-T - Reference could be made to Departmental Valuation Officer only when value adopted by assessee was less than fair market value: ITATMusk fires Tesla’s entire supercharger teamI-T - No revision u/s 263 can be initiated if there was no lack of enquiry on part of Assessing Officer on aspect of allowability of claim of deduction u/s 57: ITATAfter US & UK India comes third in terms of 79 mn cyber attacks in 2023: StudyI-T- If assessee has explained source of deposit from receipt of sale consideration of plot then assessee's explanation cannot be negated to made addition u/s 69A: ITATCore Sector loses steam in March; logs 5.2% growthTrump fined USD 9,000 for ignoring court’s gag orderGST - 1/2017-CTR - Boilers / thermal heaters does not qualify as Waste to Energy Plants and devices - Not entitled for concessional rate of tax: HCCBIC revises tariff value of gold, silver & edible oilsGST - Application for revocation of cancellation of registration - Proper Officer to decide the application within two weeks: HCTRAI extends date for public inputs on auction of spectrumIndian Army hosts lecture on 'Vision 2100'
 
CX - It is a well settled position that while considering various decisions on matter, latest decision should be preferred as that would have taken into account all the previous decisions on subject: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 28, 2014: THE short question involved is whether the trade discount passed on by the appellant to Oil Marketing Company can be considered as trade discount or not and whether excise duty is leviable on this amount considering the same as part of the value of the goods sold.

The CCE, Mumbai-II confirmed the demand of Rs.1.68 crores for the period April, 2011 to October, 2011 along with interest and, therefore, the appellant is before the CESTAT.

It is submitted that huge demands have been raised by the Revenue in the matter since 2003 and eight appeals on the same issue have been filed before the CESTAT and the Tribunal had ordered pre-deposit of 6% of the duty demanded in all these cases and, therefore, a similar view should be taken in the present appeal also. Reliance is also placed on the decision in Bhagyanagar Gas Ltd. (2013-TIOL-241-CESTAT-BANG) wherein on the same issue the Tribunal had granted stay taking into account the fact that an amount of Rs.2.22 lakhs has been paid by the appellant against the confirmed demand of Rs.20.89 lakhs. It is also submitted that except for the demand for the period April, 2003 to March, 2008, all the other demands were for the normal period of time.

The Revenue representative submitted that in the matter of the last appeal which concerned the period July, 2010 to January, 2011, vide order dated 21.1.2014 the Bench had directed the appellant to make pre-deposit of 50% of the duty confirmed within eight weeks. And, therefore, a similar view ought to be taken in the present application also.

The Bench observed -

“5.1 We find that when the stay petition came up for consideration before this Tribunal on the last occasion on 21.1.2014, this Tribunal after considering the submissions made by both the sides, directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of 50% of the duty confirmed on the ground that on the earlier decisions, pre-deposit was ordered taking into account the demand for the normal period of time. In the case before us, the entire demand is for the normal period of time. It is a well settled position that while considering various decisions on a matter, the latest decision should be preferred as that would have taken into account all the previous decisions on the subject. Therefore, following our latest order dated 21.1.2014, we direct the appellant to make a pre-deposit of 50% of excise duty confirmed within a period of eight weeks from today. On deposit of the above amount, pre-deposit of the remaining dues is waived and recovery thereof stayed during the pendency of the appeal.”

(See 2014-TIOL-462-CESTAT-MUM)


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Precedents are like old wine

"It is well settled position that...." etc might impress novices. That's about it. Older a precedent, and longer it stands undisturbed, grater its probative value, subject of course to any changes in the statute laws. One cannot find any judicial authority, or support in texts on jurisprudence that latest decisions have to be preferred over older judgments. Precedents have to be applied based on the established principles of law governing the doctrine of precedents, not based on how latest they are. "Latest" might be the politically correct approach in many fields of life, but not necessarily in the administration of justice.

Posted by Gururaj B N
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.