News Update

3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthiā€™s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTATBlinken says China trying to interfere US Presidential pollsWorld Energy Congress 2024: IREDA CMD highlights need for Innovative Financing Solutions
 
CENVAT Credit on capital goods - Credit on Captive Power Plant set up on premises leased out to adjacent unit - Tribunal by majority allows credit

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, AUG 04, 2014: THE main appellant, known as M/s. Southern Iron and Steel Company Ltd. (‘SISCOL') was established in 1996 and was in working condition till 2002. M/s. SISCOL was also brought under ‘Restructuring Scheme' under Corporate Debt Restructuring. Thereafter, M/s. SISCOL was declared a sick company and was brought under BIFR. Therefore, in order to enable them to get the finance for ‘CPP', M/s. SISCOL leased out a portion of their factory premises of 50.14 acres to M/s. JSW Power Ltd (JSWPL) for the purpose of setting up of ‘CPP'. on 17.01.2005, for a nominal amount of Rs. 10,000/- p.a. M/s. JSWPL pledged the land with the UTI Bank Ltd., to raise fund to the tune of Rs.62 crores, for the purpose of setting up of the ‘CPP' in the leased factory land for captive use of M/s. SISCOL in the manufacture of their final product i.e., iron and steel. M/s. JSWPL also used the funds to procure capital goods for the purpose of setting up the ‘CPP'. They had instructed their suppliers to indicate in the invoice as “M/s. JSWPL, Consignee of M/s. SISCOL” and on the strength of these invoices, M/s. SISCOL took the CENVAT credit on the capital goods. On 31.08.2006, M/s. SISCOL terminated the lease agreement with M/s. JSWSL and (M/s. JSWPL merged with M/s. JSWSL with effect from 01.04.2005) took over the ‘CPP'. The loan of UTI Bank was also taken over by M/s. SISCOL.

In this backdrop, department issued Show Cause Notice to deny the CENVAT credit on CPP inter alia on the following grounds:

++ The capital goods have not been received by M/s. SISCOL in its premises as the land where these capital goods were received was leased out to M/s. JSWPL and the ‘CPP' was not in the possession of M/s. SISCOL to take credit;

++ Rule 4 of the CENVAT. Credit Rules, 2004 requires that goods should be received within the factory to take credit. The real manufacturer is only M/s. JSWPL and as the land is leased out, the owners of the land is M/s. JSWPL and not M/s. SISCOL; and

++ Possession of capital goods was with M/s. JSWPL and not with M/s. SISCOL.

After hearing both sides, the Member (J) held that credit is admissible by holding that

The land has been leased to M/s. JSWPL only to set up a ‘CPP' to take care of the power requirements of M/s. SISCOL on payment of annual rent of Rs.10,000/- only. The said lease deed has been executed for raising the finance for setting up the ‘CPP' as per CDR scheme. Further, M/s. JSWPL and M/s. SISCOL merged with M/s. JSWSL, therefore, and relying on the case laws of M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. - 2007 (219) E.L.T.960 (Tri.-Del), M/s. Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. - 2004(177) E.L.T.446 (Tri.-Chennai) and M/s. Vikram Cement - 2006 (197) E.L.T.145 (S.C.), we find that the appellants are entitled to CENVAT credit on the capital goods which were being used for manufacturing of ‘CPP' by M/s. JSWPL, which is being used by the appellants to manufacture their final i.e iron and steel.

However, the Member (T) felt that the above interpretation would lead to disastrous consequences and as per the above ratio, a factory of SAIL can take credit of duty paid on equipment used by NTPC in a power plant for the reason that the power from NTPC is used in the factory of SAIL at least partially. Such benefits are not intended by the scheme. He held that the credit would be admissible only from 31.08.2006, when the two companies got merged.

In view of difference of opinion, the matter was referred to Third Member. The Third Member agreed with the Member(J) and held “Even prior to 31.8.2006, it was a Captive Power Plant of M/s. SISCOL as approved by TNEB under the Electricity Act. SISCOL was a sick unit. They entered into lease agreement with M/s. JSWPL, a relationship had already been developed prior to October 2005, as evident from CDR Cell report, JSWPL balance sheet etc., for financial accommodation to get loan from UTI Bank Ltd. for setting up C.P.P. and one of the considerations is that electricity would be supplied to M/s. SISCOL, which is an integral part of manufacturing activities of M/s. SISCOL.

Thus, by Majority order, the Tribunal allowed the credit”.

(See 2014-TIOL-1411-CESTAT-MAD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.