News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
CENVAT Credit on capital goods - Credit on Captive Power Plant set up on premises leased out to adjacent unit - Tribunal by majority allows credit

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, AUG 04, 2014: THE main appellant, known as M/s. Southern Iron and Steel Company Ltd. (‘SISCOL') was established in 1996 and was in working condition till 2002. M/s. SISCOL was also brought under ‘Restructuring Scheme' under Corporate Debt Restructuring. Thereafter, M/s. SISCOL was declared a sick company and was brought under BIFR. Therefore, in order to enable them to get the finance for ‘CPP', M/s. SISCOL leased out a portion of their factory premises of 50.14 acres to M/s. JSW Power Ltd (JSWPL) for the purpose of setting up of ‘CPP'. on 17.01.2005, for a nominal amount of Rs. 10,000/- p.a. M/s. JSWPL pledged the land with the UTI Bank Ltd., to raise fund to the tune of Rs.62 crores, for the purpose of setting up of the ‘CPP' in the leased factory land for captive use of M/s. SISCOL in the manufacture of their final product i.e., iron and steel. M/s. JSWPL also used the funds to procure capital goods for the purpose of setting up the ‘CPP'. They had instructed their suppliers to indicate in the invoice as “M/s. JSWPL, Consignee of M/s. SISCOL” and on the strength of these invoices, M/s. SISCOL took the CENVAT credit on the capital goods. On 31.08.2006, M/s. SISCOL terminated the lease agreement with M/s. JSWSL and (M/s. JSWPL merged with M/s. JSWSL with effect from 01.04.2005) took over the ‘CPP'. The loan of UTI Bank was also taken over by M/s. SISCOL.

In this backdrop, department issued Show Cause Notice to deny the CENVAT credit on CPP inter alia on the following grounds:

++ The capital goods have not been received by M/s. SISCOL in its premises as the land where these capital goods were received was leased out to M/s. JSWPL and the ‘CPP' was not in the possession of M/s. SISCOL to take credit;

++ Rule 4 of the CENVAT. Credit Rules, 2004 requires that goods should be received within the factory to take credit. The real manufacturer is only M/s. JSWPL and as the land is leased out, the owners of the land is M/s. JSWPL and not M/s. SISCOL; and

++ Possession of capital goods was with M/s. JSWPL and not with M/s. SISCOL.

After hearing both sides, the Member (J) held that credit is admissible by holding that

The land has been leased to M/s. JSWPL only to set up a ‘CPP' to take care of the power requirements of M/s. SISCOL on payment of annual rent of Rs.10,000/- only. The said lease deed has been executed for raising the finance for setting up the ‘CPP' as per CDR scheme. Further, M/s. JSWPL and M/s. SISCOL merged with M/s. JSWSL, therefore, and relying on the case laws of M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. - 2007 (219) E.L.T.960 (Tri.-Del), M/s. Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. - 2004(177) E.L.T.446 (Tri.-Chennai) and M/s. Vikram Cement - 2006 (197) E.L.T.145 (S.C.), we find that the appellants are entitled to CENVAT credit on the capital goods which were being used for manufacturing of ‘CPP' by M/s. JSWPL, which is being used by the appellants to manufacture their final i.e iron and steel.

However, the Member (T) felt that the above interpretation would lead to disastrous consequences and as per the above ratio, a factory of SAIL can take credit of duty paid on equipment used by NTPC in a power plant for the reason that the power from NTPC is used in the factory of SAIL at least partially. Such benefits are not intended by the scheme. He held that the credit would be admissible only from 31.08.2006, when the two companies got merged.

In view of difference of opinion, the matter was referred to Third Member. The Third Member agreed with the Member(J) and held “Even prior to 31.8.2006, it was a Captive Power Plant of M/s. SISCOL as approved by TNEB under the Electricity Act. SISCOL was a sick unit. They entered into lease agreement with M/s. JSWPL, a relationship had already been developed prior to October 2005, as evident from CDR Cell report, JSWPL balance sheet etc., for financial accommodation to get loan from UTI Bank Ltd. for setting up C.P.P. and one of the considerations is that electricity would be supplied to M/s. SISCOL, which is an integral part of manufacturing activities of M/s. SISCOL.

Thus, by Majority order, the Tribunal allowed the credit”.

(See 2014-TIOL-1411-CESTAT-MAD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.