News Update

I-T- As per settled position in law, if let out property remains vacant during whole of relevant AY, then its ALV is to be taken as NIL: ITATUttarakhand Govt cancels manufacturing licence of 14 products of PatanjaliI-T - If assessee has supplied raw materials or directed vendors to purchase from its associate to complete manufacturing, it is 'contract for sale' & not 'contract of work': ITATIMF okays USD 1.1 bn bail-out package for PakistanI-T - CIT(E) should decide afresh application in Form No. 10AB for grant of registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii), if application of trust was rejected without following natural justice: ITAT3 police officers killed in shoot-out in CarolinaI-T - If PCIT himself was satisfied that there was no error in order of AO vis-à-vis irregularities noted by him initially, there can be no case for exercising any revisionary power u/s 263: ITATGaza protesters on Columbia Univ campus turn tin-eared to police warningsI-T - Extension given for getting special audit done u/s 142( 2A) suffers from multiple infirmities, then assessment order is held to be void ab-initio: ITATBus swings into gorge; 25 Peruvians killedI-T - Sale consideration received in cash in lieu of agreement of sale upon failure of deal, cannot be penalized u/s 271D: ITATBattle against cocaine cartel: 9 Colombian soldiers perish in copter crashI-T- Payment made by NSE to Core SGF is business expenditure allowed u/s 37(1): ITATICG, ATS Gujarat seize Indian fishing boat carrying 173 kg of narcoticsGST - No hearing notice sent - Petitioner was prejudiced inasmuch as he could not be present at the time of personal hearing and the case was decided in his absence adversely - Matter remanded: HCTwo-Day Critical Minerals Summit begins in New DelhiGST - A taxpayer's registration can be cancelled with retrospective effect only where consequences of customers being denied ITC are intended and warranted: HCSC stays HC order directing CBI to probe against WB officials’ role in teachers’ recruitment scamGST - Proper Officer has not applied his mind to the replies submitted but merely held that the same is not proper - This ex facie shows non-application of mind - Order set aside and matter remanded: HC9 killed as two vehicles ram into each other in ChhattisgarhGST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply submitted is unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details from petitioner - Matter remitted: HCConsumer court orders Swiggy to compensate for failure to deliver Ice CreamGST - CBIC is directed to look into the issue of automatic generation of non-migrated GST numbers and take rectificatory steps to identify such non-migrated numbers and cancellation thereof: HCRequisite Checks for Appeals - Court FeeST - GTA Service supplied by assessee & Service Tax already paid by service recipient - same activity cannot be taxed again in hands of service provider under SOTG service - no scope for double taxation in statute: CESTATThe 'taxing' story of Malabar Parota, calories notwithstanding!CX - As Unit No. I is entitled to take CENVAT Credit of duty paid by Unit No. II, it is a revenue neutral situation, thus extended period of limitation cannot be invoked: CESTAT
 
Income tax - Whether when assessee is engaged in earning profits from sale & purchase of shares, dividend is merely incidental to holding of such stocks and thus, is chargeable to tax as income from other sources - YES: HC

By TIOL News Service

ALLAHABAD, SEPT 11, 2014: THE issue before the Bench is - Whether when the assessee company is mainly engaged in earning profits from purchase and sale of shares, dividend income is merely incidental to holding of such stocks and thus, is chargeable to tax as income from other sources u/s 56(2). And the verdict goes in favour of the assessee.

Facts of the case

The assessee concern is in the business of purchase and sale of shares and also derives income from dividend, commission and interest. For the AY 1992-93, assessee had filed a return showing nil income. It had showed income from dividend, commission and interest under the head "profits & gains from business or profession". AO had not accepted the submission of assessee and while passing an order u/s 143(3), it was held that the income disclosed by assessee from dividend, commission and interest was liable to be assessed under the head "income from other sources" and not under the head "profit & gains from business or profession". On appeal, CIT(A), found that since the assessee had been purchasing shares and debentures and was also selling the same, the income derived in the form of interest, dividend, debentures and shares was liable to be assessed as business income and, therefore, such income was liable to be assessed under the head "profits & gains from business or profession". The CIT(A), accordingly, allowed the appeal and deleted the addition so made by AO.

On further appeal by Revenue, Tribunal had set aside the order of the appellate authority and restored the order of AO holding that the income of the assessee derived from dividend, commission etc was liable to be assessed under the head "Income from other sources" u/s 56(2).

Held that,

++ it is a cardinal principle of law relating to Income Tax that the income tax is single charge on a total income of an assessee. For the purpose of computation, the Statute recognises different kinds of income which it classifies under different heads of income. For each head of income, the Statute provides a mode for computing the quantum of such income. The contention that dividend income received by the appellant in respect of shares held by him was income from business chargeable under Section 14 of the Act under the head profit against the business and profession cannot be accepted. Section 14 starts with the words "Save as otherwise provided by this Act", which indicates that for the purpose of charge of income tax and computation of total income, all income shall be classified under the five following heads of income specified in Section 14 unless it is specifically provided otherwise elsewhere by the Act. On the other hand, Section 56(2) clearly provides that dividends would be chargeable to income tax under the head "Income from other sources". The mandatory character of Section 56(2) read with Section 14 is indicated by the language employed therein that the following income namely, "dividends" shall be chargeable to income tax under the head "Income from other sources" and the intention of the legislature in making "dividends" chargeable under the heading "Income from other sources" is apparently clear. The legislature has made various heads of income. Every item of income would fall under a particular head or the other. For the purpose of computing the income, the particular section dealing with that head will have to be looked into. The various sources of income, profit and gains which have been so specified under various heads become chargeable under Section 14 either as income from salary, property, profits and gains in business and profession, capital gains or income from other sources;

++ in the instant case, the appellant held shares as stock-in-trade. The dividend income earned by him on the shares does not cease to be income which arises in the course of business, though for the purpose of chargeability to tax, such income would be included under the head "Income from other sources". We find that where a shareholder receives dividends in respect of the shares held by him, the dividend is received because of the fact of his holding the shares. When in the instant case, the appellant deals in shares and buys them in order to sell them, his main activity is the purchase and sale of shares. There may be no doubt of earning substantial dividends on the shares but one has to consider from the point of view that the appellant's business income consist of purchase and sale of shares. The appellant does not purchase the shares with a view to get dividend, but the object of purchasing his shares is to earn profit by the sale of those shares. In our opinion earning of dividends is thus merely the incidental result to the main activity of the purchase and sale of shares. In our view, receipt of dividends will not be chargeable to income tax under the head "profits & gains from business or profession";

++ in the light of the aforesaid, it is immaterial whether the shares are held by the appellant as stock-in-trade. The dividend income derived from these shares is specifically chargeable under the head "Income from other sources". Consequently, it is immaterial whether the appellant is a dealer or a trader and caries on business of purchase and sale of shares. We find that the Tribunal after relying upon the decisions of the Bombay High Court in CIT, Bombay City-II Vs. D.G.Goenka, 1981 ITR (129), 260 and of the Gujarat High Court in additional Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs. Laxmi Agents P.Ltd.,1980 ITR (125), 227 had rightly come to the conclusion that the dividend income arrived at by the appellant was chargeable under the head "Income from other sources". For the reasons stated aforesaid, we do not agree with the decision cited by the counsel for the assessee of the Delhi High Court in CIT Vs. Excellent Commercial Enterprises and Investment Ltd., 2005-TIOL-108-HC-DEL-IT. We do not find any error in the impugned order passed by the Tribunal. Accordingly, the question of law is answered in favour of the Department and against the assessee. The appeal fails and is dismissed.

(See 2014-TIOL-1553-HC-ALL-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.