News Update

Cabinet approves 309 Km long new line between Mumbai and IndoreKGST - As is trite law, a suit filed prior has to be adjudicated so as to bar a suit filed subsequently & that doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable without a previous adjudication: HCCabinet approves seven major schemes for improving farmers' lives and livelihoodsGST - Adjournment was granted for two weeks but the proper officer passed the orders before the period was over - Orders set aside and matter remanded: HCCabinet approves one more semiconductor unit under ISMTurkey keen to join BRICS in effort to look beyond WestGST - Shipping bill can be considered as an application for refund of IGST in terms of rule 96: HCCabinet approves Digital Agriculture Mission with outlay of Rs. 2817 CroreIndia’s manufacturing PMI marginally down to 57.5 in AugustGST - Petitioner is permitted to pay amounts assessed in 24 equal monthly instalments together with interest - Recovery proceedings to be kept in abeyance: HCCCPA imposes penalty of Rs 5 Lakh on Shankar IAS AcademySC sets up Judge-headed panel to sort out protesting farmers’ grievancesGST - S.80 - Instalment facility granted to pay defaulted tax - If petitioner commits any default in payment of even a single instalment, it is open to respondents to proceed for recovery: HCPM to be on official tour to Singapore & Brunei between Sept 3 to 5GST - Allegation is that petitioner availed ITC in contravention of s.16 - Petitioner submits that they paid output tax without utilising ITC in question - Matter remanded: HCCBDT issues transfer order of 17 Addl / JCITsCBDT promotes 6 IRS officers as CCITThe making of an 'Input Service Distributor'President Murmu unwraps new Insignia and flag of Supreme Court of IndiaCBIC amends Sea Cargo Manifest & Transshipment Regulations‘Kavach’ system to be deployed in mission mode: Rail MantriMoS unveils New Single Unified Pension Form for Senior CitizensGST mop-up in August month rises to Rs 1.75 lakh crore
 
Section 76 discourages right to litigate

MARCH 01, 2015

By Monarch Bhatt

THE Finance Minister has proposed to substitute section 76 wherein, a mandatory penalty of 10% has been proposed in different scenarios. The important point is to be noted here is that the penalty under section 76 will be attracted in a cases, where there is no fraud or collusion or willful misstatement or suppression of facts or contravention of any of the provision of the Act or rules has not been made with the intent to evade payment of Service Tax.

The penalty under section 76 will not be levied, if the person who has been served with the show cause notice under section 73(1), discharges the service tax alongwith interest within 30 days from the serving of show cause notice.

In case the order has been passed by the central excise officer, the penalty under section 76 shall be 25% of the penalty imposed in the order, if service tax alongwith interest and reduced penalty is paid within 30 days of passing of the order.

Similarly, in case service tax amount is reduced by the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) or of the Appellate Tribunal or of the Court, the penalty payable under section 76 will be 25% of the penalty amount, if service tax alongwith interest and reduced penalty is paid within 30 days of passing of such order.

Therefore, as per the proposed amendment to section 76, if assessee does not challenge the show cause notice itself and discharges the service tax alongwith interest within 30 days, then only penalty will not be leviable. If assessee challenges the same and does not succeed, assessee has to pay mandatory amount of penalty under section 76.

The proposed section 76 overrides all the decided cases of Hon'ble Supreme Court wherein in a number of cases including the case of Pushpam Pharmaceuticals - 2002-TIOL-235-SC-CX , Cosmic Dye Chemical - 2002-TIOL-236-SC-CX-LB, Hindustan Steels Ltd. - 2002-TIOL-148-SC-CT-LB held that to impose the penalty there must be mala-fide intention with intent to evade payment of taxes. As per the proposed section 76, the penalty is leviable even though there is no mala-fide intension for evasion taxes.

In my view, it is threat to the assessee, to forgo the right of litigation and choose the option of making payment as per the show cause notice and get immunity from the penalty under section 76. Assessee can definitely challenge the same as it is legal right of the assessee and no law can be formed to discourage the assessee from claiming their rights.

( DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Section 76 discourages right to litigate

like other fms mr. jetly also could not realise his core duty to ensure that simultaneously he has to bring provisions to make law clear, to have pressure on the officers to not to raise fake, baseless scns which are 80% in nos.

section 80 delete kar dee hai so no body can stablish bona fide belief.

billing par hi paisa bhar do ye bhi kanoon hai. bad debts written off and approved by auditors bhi aapko manya nahi hai....aur middle class ka budget bata rahe hain.

penalty jindagi bhar aaram aur haram ki kamai khane wale aur fir chain se pension ka sukh bhogne wale afsaron par kyon nahi hai...

tribunal me agar deptt. haarta hai to scn issue karne wale officer par ek saal ki salary ke barabar penalty lagaiye na.

1 se lekar 10% tak ki penalty me kis rate se lagani hai ye bhi officer ki marji aur mercy par rahega.....


Posted by Navin Khandelwal
 

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube brings you an interview with former US Secretary of Treasury, Mr. Larry Summers who was recently in Delhi.



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.