News Update

Cabinet approves 309 Km long new line between Mumbai and IndoreKGST - As is trite law, a suit filed prior has to be adjudicated so as to bar a suit filed subsequently & that doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable without a previous adjudication: HCCabinet approves seven major schemes for improving farmers' lives and livelihoodsGST - Adjournment was granted for two weeks but the proper officer passed the orders before the period was over - Orders set aside and matter remanded: HCCabinet approves one more semiconductor unit under ISMTurkey keen to join BRICS in effort to look beyond WestGST - Shipping bill can be considered as an application for refund of IGST in terms of rule 96: HCCabinet approves Digital Agriculture Mission with outlay of Rs. 2817 CroreIndia’s manufacturing PMI marginally down to 57.5 in AugustGST - Petitioner is permitted to pay amounts assessed in 24 equal monthly instalments together with interest - Recovery proceedings to be kept in abeyance: HCCCPA imposes penalty of Rs 5 Lakh on Shankar IAS AcademySC sets up Judge-headed panel to sort out protesting farmers’ grievancesGST - S.80 - Instalment facility granted to pay defaulted tax - If petitioner commits any default in payment of even a single instalment, it is open to respondents to proceed for recovery: HCPM to be on official tour to Singapore & Brunei between Sept 3 to 5GST - Allegation is that petitioner availed ITC in contravention of s.16 - Petitioner submits that they paid output tax without utilising ITC in question - Matter remanded: HCCBDT issues transfer order of 17 Addl / JCITsCBDT promotes 6 IRS officers as CCITThe making of an 'Input Service Distributor'President Murmu unwraps new Insignia and flag of Supreme Court of IndiaCBIC amends Sea Cargo Manifest & Transshipment Regulations‘Kavach’ system to be deployed in mission mode: Rail MantriMoS unveils New Single Unified Pension Form for Senior CitizensGST mop-up in August month rises to Rs 1.75 lakh crore
 
Odoriferous compound/agarbathi mix finally gets an exemption

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, MAR 01, 2015: IN the matter of excisability of Odoriferous compound/ agarbathi mix arising during the course of manufacture of agarbathi, the Board had with a renewed vigour come out with a Circular 989/13/2014-CX.3, Dated: November 7, 2014 and which read -

“2. It has been reported that some manufacturers of such odoriferous compounds have claimed non-excisability on the ground that such compounds are a trade secret, not sold in the market and hence not excisable. This is despite the fact that such compounds have shelf life and are capable of being marketed as a distinct identifiable commodity.

3. It may be noted that Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 has been amended in 2008 to insert a deeming fiction regarding marketability. Specific cases have been detected, where intermediate masala mix has been found to be actually bought and sold. It is therefore clarified that Board's Circular No. 495/61/1999-CX.3 dated 22.11.1999 is applicable only to such intermediate compound or odoriferous compounds as are not capable of being bought and sold. In cases where on the basis of evidence it is established that such intermediate compounds are capable of being marketed, the same will be excisable, irrespective of whether the compound is actually marketed or not.”

We had, while reporting this Circular in DDT 2471 asked -

How much money are they going to get from the agarbathi (perfumed incense stick) manufacturers as excise duty on the secret odoriferous compounds? Even if it is excisable and dutiable, shouldn't it be exempted - and what is the cost of litigation?

Thankfully, someone in the Board realized the folly of being penny wise and, therefore, the Central Government has come out with the following exemption notification 13/2015-CE , dated 01.03.2015.

This notification inserts a serial no. 8A in the notification 10/96-CE, dated 23.07.1996 thereby granting full exemption from excise duty to all goods which are consumed within the factory of their production in the manufacture of Agarbatti [3307 41 00].

Thankfully, the Board Circular would now no longer give out any odour -Agarbatti or Agarbathi -does not matter - after all, it smells the same!


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: agarbatti

The notification could have been retrospective.

Posted by sujisham sham
 
Sub: Retrospectivity to exemption

The Board has been after agarbathi manufacturers since 1998 and has been unsuccessful in recovering this duty on the odoriferous compound. Though the pending duty demand is a pittance for government, it casts huge burden on the agarbathi manufacturers. The government should consider inserting a retrospective validation provision in the Finance Act, 2015 and bury the hatchet.

Posted by Gururaj B N
 

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube brings you an interview with former US Secretary of Treasury, Mr. Larry Summers who was recently in Delhi.



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.