News Update

ICG seizes 86 kg narcotics worth Rs 600 croreChief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan concludes his official visit to France9 killed as two vehicles ram into each other in ChhattisgarhConsumer court orders Swiggy to compensate for failure to deliver Ice CreamRequisite Checks for Appeals - Court FeeI-T - Members of Settlement Commission appointed amongst persons of integrity & outstanding ability & having special knowledge in/experience of direct taxes; unfortunate that SETCOM's orders are challenged without establishing them to be contrary to law or lacking in jurisdiction: HCThe 'taxing' story of Malabar Parota, calories notwithstanding!I-T - Unless a case of bias, fraud or malice is alleged, then Department cannot assail SETCOM's order: HCCentre allows export of 99,150 MT onion to Bangladesh, UAE, Bhutan, Bahrain, Mauritius & LankaI-T- Re-assessment vide Faceless Assessment u/s 144 of I-T Act, is barred by Section 31 of IBC 2016, which is binding upon all creditors of corporate debtor: HCPension Portals of all Pension Disbursing Banks to be integratedI-T- Resolution Plan under IBC, once approved, nullifies any claims pertaining to a period prior to approval of said Plan: HC‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiI-T - Once assessee has produced all supporting documents which includes profit & loss account, balance sheet and copy of ITR of creditors, then identity & creditworthiness is established: ITATTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKI-T - Assessee shall provide monthly figures to arrive at year-end average of deposits received from members, interest paid thereon & investments made in FDs from external funds, for calculating Sec 80P deduction: ITATMaersk to invest USD 600 mn in Nigerian seaport infraI-T - It shall not be necessary to issue authorization u/s 132 separately in name of each person where authorization has been issued mentioning thereon more than one person: ITATChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killedI-T- Since facts have not yet been verified by AO, issue of CSR expenditure can be remanded back for reconsideration: ITATIndian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreI-T - Failure to substantiate cash deposits by employer during festival will not automatically lead to additions u/s 68, in absence of any opportunity of hearing: ITATGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionGST - There is no material on record to show as to why the registration is sought to be cancelled retrospectively - Order cannot be sustained: HCIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termST - Court cannot examine the issue, which is only a question of fact and evidence and not of the law - Petition dismissed: HCGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand notice
 
I-T - Whether anonymous donations received by religious trust would fall within scope of Sec 115BBC and to be added to its income if activity of Trust is spiritual and not religious - NO: High Court

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 16, 2015: THE issue before the Bench is - Whether anonymous donations received by a religious trust would fall within the scope of Section 115BBC and will be added to its income, if the activity of the trust is 'spiritual' and not 'religious'. NO is the answer.

Facts of the case

The assessee is a registered trust. For the AY in question, the assessee had filed its return accompanied by an audit report, balance sheet, income and expenditure account etc. The case of assessee was picked up for scrutiny, wherein it was found that the assessee had received Rs.5,28,84,204/- by way of donations. While the details of the names and addresses of the donors to the extent of Rs.5,01,588,98 was furnished, the details of donors to the extent of Rs.27,25,306 were not explained. The assessee explained that it was mainly involved in imparting of spiritual education through lectures/samagam delivered by Brahmarishi Kumar Swami Ji and in distribution of medicines and clothes to the needy and destitute. The AO, therefore, proceeded to invoke Section 115BBC and add the aforementioned sum to the income of assessee. It was held by AO that although the legislature had exempted wholly public religious trusts from the provision of Section 115BBC, the case of assessee was not of public religious trust but a case of spiritual organization. Therefore, the case of the assessee was clearly hit by the provision of Section 115BBC. Accordingly, a sum of Rs.27,25,306/- was, therefore, treated as anonymous donations and brought to tax as per Section 115BBC and seperately initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c).

On appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the action of AO. On further appeal, the Tribunal concluded that the AO and CIT had proceeded "on a very narrow and incorrect understanding in holding that the assessee trust was engaged in spreading spirituality and since Section 115BBC only exempts religious trust, a trust allegedly imparting spiritual knowledge was consequently not contemplated as an exception by the Legislature as much as it consequently was barred to claim exemption vis-a-vis the anonymous donation.

Having heard the parties, the High Court held that,

++ the question posed arises in the context of the anonymous donations received by the assessee trust and the view of the AO that such donations would not be exempt within the scope of Section 115BBC since the activity of the trust was 'spiritual' and not 'religious'. In Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Dawoodi Bohra Jamat, the Supreme Court after analysing the objects of the trust in that case held that they were "not indicative of a wholly religious purpose but were collective indicative of both charitable and religious purposes." It was held in the context of that case that "the establishment of Madarsas or institutions to impart religious education to the masses would qualify as a charitable purpose qualifying under the head of education under the provisions of Section 2(15). What can constitute religious activity in the context of the Hindu religion need not be confined the activities incidental to a place of worship like a temple. The Supreme Court in The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar held that "a religious denomination or organization enjoys complete autonomy in the matter of deciding as to what rites and ceremonies are essential according to the tenets of the religion they hold and no outside authority has any jurisdiction to interfere with their decision in such matters;

++ it might well be that a Hindu religious institution like the assessee is also engaged in charitable activities which are very much part of religious activity. In carrying on charitable activities along with organising of spiritual lectures, the assessee by no means ceases to be a religious institution. The activities described by the assessee as having been undertaken by it during the A.Y in question can be included in the broad conspectus of Hindu religious activity when viewed in the context of the objects of the trust and its activities in general. For the aforementioned reasons, the Court finds no legal infirmity in the conclusion of the ITAT that for the purpose of Section 115BBC(2)(a), anonymous donations received by assessee would qualify for deduction and it cannot be included in its assessable income.

(See 2015-TIOL-2141-HC-DEL-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.