News Update

PM-STIAC discusses accelerating Industry-Academia Partnership for Research and InnovationIndia, Singapore hold dialogue over cyber policy44 bids received under 10th Round of Commercial Coal Mine AuctionsCops arrest former Dy PM of Nepal in cooperative fraud casePuri highlights India's Petrochemical potential at India Chem 2024UN reports record high cocaine production in ColombiaMinister unveils 'Aviation Park' showcasing India's Aviation HeritageED finds PFI wanted to start Islamic movement in IndiaBlocking Credit - Rule 86ASEBI says investors can use 3-in-1 accounts to apply online for securitiesI-T- Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) need not be imposed when assessee moved an adjournment application & later complied with notice u/s 142(1): ITAT4 Kanwariyas killed as vehicle runs over them in Banka, BiharI-T- Accounting principles do not prescribe maintaining of a day-to-day stock register, and the books of accounts cannot be rejected on this basis alone: ITATUN food looted and diverted to army in EthiopiaCus - Alleged breach of conditions for operating public bonded warehouse; CESTAT rightly rejected allegations, having found no evidence of any such breach: HCUS budget deficit surges beyond USD 1.8 trillionST - Onus for proving admissibility of Cenvat Credit rests with service provider under Rule 9(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTATIf China goes into Taiwan, Trump promises to impose additional tariffsRussians love Indian films; Putin lauds BollywoodCus - Classification of goods is to be determined in accordance with Customs Tariff Act & General Interpretative Rules; Country-of-Origin Certificate may offer some guidance, but cannot solely dictate classification: CESTATCus - Benefit of such Country-of-Origin certificates cannot be denied if all relevant conditions are met under the applicable Customs Tariff rules: CESTATCuban power grid collapses; Country plunges into darknessCus - As per trite law, merely claiming a classification or exemption does not constitute mis-declaration or suppression - any misclassification does not equate to willful intent to evade duty: CESTATKarnataka mulling over 2% fee on aggregator platforms to bankroll gig worker welfare fundCus - Extended limitation cannot be invoked in case of assessee who is a regular importer with a consistent classification approach: CESTAT
 
ST - CENVAT - In respect of services availed beyond territory of India and obviously outside place of removal, there can be no doubt regarding its inadmissibility: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, APRIL 22, 2016 : THE CENVAT credit of Service Tax paid on the following Business Support Services viz. Terminal Handling Charges,Documentation Charges, Destination Terminal Handling Charges,Destination Documentation Charges,Destination Haulage and Shutout charges and Ground Rent availed at the Port was denied on the ground that these were services used beyond the place of removal.

Before the CESTAT, the appellant placed reliance on the Board Circular No. 999/6/2015-CX dated 28.2.2015 in support of their stand of taking credit. It is also submitted that in respect of certain services availed at the destination beyond the Port and outside India, it was their bona fide belief that they are entitled to such services. It was also argued that in absence of any mala fide intent extended period of limitation is not invocable.

The AR reiterated the order of the lower authority and derived support from the decisions in Excel Crop Care Ltd. - 2007-TIOL-701-CESTAT-AHM & PMP Auto Components (P) Ltd. - 2012-TIOL-719-CESTAT-MUM.

The Bench observed -

On Merits:

++ The CBE & C, vide aforesaid Circular, has clarified that in case of manufacture-exporter the place of removal for the purpose of export would be the Port/ICD/CFS. In the instant case, the appellant is a manufacturer-exporter and has availed credit in respect of services received upto the Port of clearance and beyond that as well. So far as the services received up to the Port clearance, which is the place of removal for the purpose of manufacturer-exporter as per CBE & C Circular, the credit of Service Tax cannot be denied. However, in respect of services availed at the destination, which is not only beyond the place of removal but also outside India, the same is not admissible.

Limitation:

++ In the era of self-assessment, onus of taking the correct credit is on the appellant. In respect of services availed beyond the territory of India and obviously outside the place of removal, there can be no doubt regarding its inadmissibility. Availment of such credit is obviously without authority of law and mala fide. In such circumstances, extended period for the purpose of demand is correctly invoked.

Conclusion:

The demand for recovery of credit in respect of Terminal Handling Charges and Documentation charges is dropped. Rest of the demand in respect of Destination Terminal Handling Charges, Destination Documentation Charges & Destination Haulage and Shutout charges is confirmed. The penalty is also revised accordingly to the amount equal to the demand confirmed.

The Appeal was partly allowed.

(See 2016-TIOL-961-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Samrat Choudhary, Hon’ble Deputy CM & FM of State of Bihar, delivering inaugural speech at TIOL Tax Congress 2024.



Justice A K Patnaik, Mentor to Hon'ble Jury for TIOL Awards 2024, addressing the gathering at the event.