News Update

May Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemST - Appellant was performing statutory functions as mandated by EPF & MP Act, and the Constitution of India, as per Board's Circular 96/7/2007-ST , services provided under Statutory obligations are not taxable: CESTATKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamI-T - Scrutiny assessment order cannot be assailed where assessee confuses it with order passed pursuant to invocation of revisionary power u/s 263: HCHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningI-T - Assessment order invalidated where passed in rushed manner to avoid being hit by impending end of limitation period: HCColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashI-T - Additions framed on account of bogus purchases merits being restricted to profit element embedded therein, where AO has not doubted sales made out of such purchases: HCIndia to host prestigious 46th Antarctic Treaty Consultative MeetingI-T - Miscellaneous Application before ITAT delayed by 1279 days without any just causes or bona fide; no relief for assessee: HCAdani Port & SEZ secures AAA RatingI-T - Assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 54EC on account of investment made in REC Bonds, provided both investments were made within period of six months as prescribed u/s 54EC: ITATNominations for Padma Awards 2025 beginsI-T - PCIT cannot invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 when there is no case of lack of enquiry or adequate enquiry on part of AO: ITATMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDOI-T - If purchases & corresponding sales were duly matched, it cannot be said that same were made out of disclosed sources of income: ITATViksit Bharat @2047: Taxes form the BedrockI-T - Reopening of assessment is invalid as while recording reasons for reopening of assessment, AO has not thoroughly examined materials available in his own record : ITAT
 
Cus - Notfn. 12/2012-Cus has been issued in public interest- Therefore, it is not correct on part of Revenue to state that since purpose of import of aircraft is in nature of personal use and not for public use the benefit should be denied: AAR

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, AUG 30, 2016: APPLICANT is a public limited company proposing to import aircraft for providing non-scheduled (charter) service - they intend to charter the aircraft imported to related companies, primarily for use by the related company's top executives, directors, investors, promoters and their family members/friends, as revenue flights.

They seek ruling from the Authority on -

Whether the benefit of the Notification No. 12/2012-Cus is available to NSOP (Non-Schedule Operator's Permit) holder for the following categories of revenue flights proposed to be undertaken -

a) Use by the permit holder's employees/directors/investors and their family/friends, not necessarily for business purposes.

b) Charter the aircraft to group companies for use by their employees/directors/investors and their family/friends, not necessarily for business purposes

c) Lease the aircraft to group companies for use by their employees/directors/investors and their family/friends, not necessarily for business purposes.

Revenue submits -that the intended purpose of this aircraft is in the nature of personal use and not for public use; that the aircraft is intended to be used for the personal use of their employees/directors/investors and their family/friends, not necessarily for business purposes - exemption notification (Sr. No. 453 of Notification No. 12/2012-Cus) does not cover these situations to be eligible to claim the benefit of the said notification - As the public interest is always a guiding factor in exemption and as the applicant does not fall within the scope of the notification, the application made for advance ruling may be rejected.

Ruling by Advance Rulings Authority:

+ Both the conditions in condition 77 annexed to Notification 12/2012-Cus[Sr. No. 453] make it clear that approval of competent authority is required for import of aircraft for providing non-scheduled (passenger) services or non-scheduled (charter) services and importer is required to furnish undertaking to the Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Customs at the time of import to the effect that the aircraft shall be used only for providing non-scheduled (passenger) services or non-scheduled (charter) services, as the case may be.

+ Both these conditions have to be read in conjunction with Explanation 2 to the notification, which clarifies that the use of such imported aircraft by a non-scheduled (passenger) operator for non-scheduled (charter) services or by a non-scheduled (charter) operator for non-scheduled (passenger) services, shall not be construed to be a violation of the conditions of import at concessional rate of duty. It is noticed from the application filed by the applicant that the applicant is proposing to import aircraft for providing non-scheduled (charter) services; therefore, applicant may use the aircraft imported for providing non-scheduled (passenger) services or non-scheduled (charter) services.

+ Paragraph 2.5 of CAR issued in pursuance of Rule 133A of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 is regarding operation and use of aircraft and same is part of Explanation I (c) to Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. Therefore, the contention of Revenue that provisions of CAR 2.5 and 2.6 cannot be invoked to avail concessions/facility/ provisions, are not correct. It also noticed that the subject notification as well as contents of CAR does not debar the use of said aircraft for other than business purposes. In the absence of any such restriction, aircraft can be used for other than business purposes.

+ Notification No. 12/2012-Cus has been issued by the Central Govt. in public interest. As discussed, benefit of exemption notification has been extended to operators subject to fulfillment of conditions mentioned therein. Therefore, it is not correct on the part of the Revenue to state that the applicant does not fall within the scope of the notification.

Ruling on the application:

The benefit of the Notification No. 12/2012-Cus is available to NSOP (Non Schedule Operator's Permit) holder for the following categories of revenue flights (with published tariff) proposed to be undertaken;

a) Use by the permit holder's employees/directors and their family, not necessarily for business purposes.

b) Charter the aircraft to group companies for use by their employees/directors and their family, not necessarily for business purposes

c) Lease the aircraft to group companies for use by their employees/directors and their family, not necessarily for business purposes.

The application was allowed.

(See 2016-TIOL-23-ARA-CUS)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.