Cus - Tribunal being creature of statute should restrain itself from embarrassing Executives - Costs imposed on Commissioner waived: CESTAT
By TIOL News Service
MUMBAI, MAY 18, 2017: THE Commissioner of Customs (Export), Mumbai had filed a Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of mistake in the interim order dated 10th August 2015 passed by the Tribunal wherein stay was granted from recovery of amounts(of drawback disbursed and penalties imposed) from the appellant.
Thoroughly peeved with the submissions made by the AR at the time of hearing and the contents of the application, the Member (Technical) writing for the Bench, while imposing costs, observed thus -
+ Our courts and tribunals are overworked owing to manifold causes and not the least of which is the apathetic abdication of responsibility by senior levels of the tax administration in the resort to litigation. Escalating the workload without justifiable cause, or even by patent ignorance, must be checked.
+ The impulse to litigate against an order of the Tribunal that is not to its satisfaction or if the interpretation is seen as potential threat to their fief is disservice to public interest.
+ We are not sure if the present application is motivated by ill-advice, lack of knowledge, unwillingness to accept the law, overweening desire to display juristic brilliance or merely an exercise in evading responsibility.
+ We are certain that it demonstrates impulsive reaction without even the most rudimentary application of mind. To condone that is to abet in condoning irresponsible behavior and to encourage frivolous litigation.
+ To that end, we impose costs of Rs.10,000/- on the applicant-Commissioner to be paid in to the Prime Minister's Relief Fund within 45 days of receipt of the order.
The Application for rectification of mistake was dismissed.
We reported this order as 2016-TIOL-2945-CESTAT-MUM .And in our breaking news also made a mention of DDT 2315 wherein the following was also examined viz. Can payment be ordered to PM's Relief Fund? And Can CESTAT/ITAT impose costs?
Be that as it may, the Commissioner of Customs (Export), in the instant case, has filed another Miscellaneous application before the CESTAT seeking waiver of the costs imposed.
The Member (Judicial) writing for the Division Bench (the Member(T) is the same) in a succinct order held thus -
"Judiciary and Executive are expected to act within their own jurisdiction to do public good without encroaching each others jurisdiction. Good justice delivery system gains public confidence when it is self disciplined. Tribunal has limited power of Civil Court under Section 129C(8) of Customs Act, 1962 without any statutory power to impose cost on a quasi judicial Authority of tax administration. Tribunal being a creature of the statute, it should restrain itself from embarrassing Executives who are expected to act on good faith. It may be stated that judiciary is highly respected because it has power of excusing the deserved."
Resultantly, all the miscellaneous applications were allowed and the cost imposed on the Commissioner was waived.
(See 2017-TIOL-1658-CESTAT-MUM)
|