News Update

Requisite Checks for Appeals - Court FeeI-T - Members of Settlement Commission appointed amongst persons of integrity & outstanding ability & having special knowledge in/experience of direct taxes; unfortunate that SETCOM's orders are challenged without establishing them to be contrary to law or lacking in jurisdiction: HCThe 'taxing' story of Malabar Parota, calories notwithstanding!I-T - Unless a case of bias, fraud or malice is alleged, then Department cannot assail SETCOM's order: HCCentre allows export of 99,150 MT onion to Bangladesh, UAE, Bhutan, Bahrain, Mauritius & LankaI-T- Re-assessment vide Faceless Assessment u/s 144 of I-T Act, is barred by Section 31 of IBC 2016, which is binding upon all creditors of corporate debtor: HCPension Portals of all Pension Disbursing Banks to be integratedI-T- Resolution Plan under IBC, once approved, nullifies any claims pertaining to a period prior to approval of said Plan: HC‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiI-T - Once assessee has produced all supporting documents which includes profit & loss account, balance sheet and copy of ITR of creditors, then identity & creditworthiness is established: ITATTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKI-T - Assessee shall provide monthly figures to arrive at year-end average of deposits received from members, interest paid thereon & investments made in FDs from external funds, for calculating Sec 80P deduction: ITATMaersk to invest USD 600 mn in Nigerian seaport infraI-T - It shall not be necessary to issue authorization u/s 132 separately in name of each person where authorization has been issued mentioning thereon more than one person: ITATChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killedI-T- Since facts have not yet been verified by AO, issue of CSR expenditure can be remanded back for reconsideration: ITATIndian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreI-T - Failure to substantiate cash deposits by employer during festival will not automatically lead to additions u/s 68, in absence of any opportunity of hearing: ITATGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionGST - There is no material on record to show as to why the registration is sought to be cancelled retrospectively - Order cannot be sustained: HCIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termGST - SCN does not put the petitioner to notice that the registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively, therefore, petitioner did not have any opportunity to object to the same - Order modified: HCUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedGST - A taxpayer's registration can be cancelled with retrospective effect only where such consequences are intended and are warranted: HCZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to EuropeGST - Rule 86A - Single Judge was correct in relegating appellant to his alternate remedy of replying to SCNs and getting matter adjudicated by adjudicating authority: HC20 army men killed in blasts at army base in CambodiaST -Simultaneous filing of refund applications by service provider/KSFE and the service recipients/petitioners for same amount - Applications ought not to be rejected on technical issue when applications filed in time: HC3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USST - Court cannot examine the issue, which is only a question of fact and evidence and not of the law - Petition dismissed: HCJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsCX - Department ought not to have waited for rebate proceedings to get finalized and ought to have issued SCN within normal period: CESTATGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeCus - As Section 149 prior to its amendment, does not prescribe any time limit, the Board vide Circular 36/2010 cannot impose a time limit so as to decline the request for amendment of shipping bill: CESTAT
 
ST – Appellants supplied goods to foreign country and testing was conducted on such goods outside India only and, therefore, said service is not taxable: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, AUG 21, 2017: DURING the period 2004-05 to 2008-09, the appellants paid service charge to foreign-based companies for testing and analysis of sample sent by them. The reports of the test and analysis provided by the foreign-based company were received and utilised by the appellants.

Revenue was of the view that the appellant ought to have discharged service tax liability on reverse charge basis in terms of rule 2(1)(d)(iv) of the STR, 1994.

SCNs for the impugned period were issued and confirmed by the original authority.

In appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the demand for the period from 18.04.2006 onwards and dropped the demand for the prior period.

The appellant is before the CESTAT and submits that admittedly the foreign service provider is providing service of technical testing and analysis in respect of the goods of the appellants outside India only; therefore, entire service was wholly performed outside India; that as per the Taxation of Services (Provided from outside India and received in India) Rules, 2006 issued vide notification 11/06-ST dated 19.04.2006 as per sub-rule 3 of clause (ii) the services falling under (zzh) can be taxable only when such service are performed in India. Inasmuch as in the present case the appellants supplied the goods to foreign country and the testing was conducted on such goods outside India only and, therefore, the same is not taxable.

Reliance is inter alia placed on the decisions in BMD Pvt. Ltd - 2012-TIOL-743-CESTAT-DEL and Crompton Greaves Ltd. - 2015-TIOL-2724-CESTAT-MUM.

The AR reiterated the findings of the impugned orders.

The Bench observed –

"4. … We find that there is no dispute in the fact that technical testing and analysis service was provided by the foreign service provider in relation to the testing of the goods supplied by the appellants to foreign country. The performance of such service was wholly carried out in foreign country. For the purpose of levying service tax on the services provided from outside India and received in India, section 66A was enacted wherein Taxation of Services (Provided from outside India and received in India) Rules, 2006 was issued. The relevant provision of rule is reproduced below:- "3. Taxable services provided from outside India and received in India. - x x x"

5. In the present case service of technical testing and analysis is covered under sub-clause (zzh) of clause 105 of Section 65 of Finance Act, as per sub-clause (ii) of Rule 3 as reproduced above, in case of technical testing and analysis service (zzh) if such service is performed in India even either wholly or partly by the person located outside India then it will be taxable in the hands of the recipient under the reverse charge mechanism. However, in the present case the technical testing and analysis was provided wholly in a country outside India, therefore by virtue of Rule 3 clause (ii) the said service is not liable to service tax. This issue has been considered by this Tribunal in the case of Crompton Greaves Ltd. (supra) wherein the Tribunal has passed the following order:- x x x"

In fine, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.

(See 2017-TIOL-3010-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.