News Update

CBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold & silverFormer IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt jailed for 20 yrs for planting drugs to frame lawyerCentre receives Rs 18.5 lakh crore tax revenue upto Feb monthUN says Households waste across world is now at least one billion meals a dayExpert Committee on developing GIFT IFSC as 'Global Finance and Accounting Hub' submits report to IFSCAIndia, China hold fresh dialogue for complete disengagement on Western borders: MEADefence Production issues notification for re-organisation of DGQAThakur says India is prepared for 2036 OlympicsCBDT substitutes Form in ITR-5EV Revolution: Lessons for India to learn from US and China!London court green-signals auction of luxury apartment of fugitive Nirav ModiGovt consults RBI; finalises borrowing plan for first half of FY 2024-25Gadkari says Farmers’ protest is politically-motivatedVP calls upon women entrepreneurs to be 'Vocal for Local'America offers USD 10 mn bounty for information on ‘Blackcat’ hackers after UnitedHealth gets hitI-T- The order of the ITSC can only be reopened in cases of fraud or misrepresentation: HC8 persons including Hezbollah militants killed in Israeli strike on LebanonMacron pillories EU-South Africa trade deal; calls it ‘really bad’ in BrazilThailand’s Lower House okays Bill to legitimise same-sex marriageYellen warns China against clean energy dumpingMilky Way’s central black hole - Twisted magnetic field observedCus - Assessee has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that goods in question imported under air way bills/bills of entry were in fact filed by him and hence the only natural corollary available to Revenue is confiscation of same: CESTATSmall investors help Trump Media’s valuation skyrocket to USD 13 billionJustice Ritu Raj Awasthi joins as Judicial member of Lokpal
 
ST - Audit - It would be iniquitous to allow respondents to proceed on basis of provisions struck down by High Court, against petitioner: HC

 

By TIOL News Service

KOLKATA, JULY 20, 2018: BY this Writ Petition filed in the year 2015, the petitioner sought a declaration that sub-rule (2) of Rule 5A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 as substituted by notification no. 23/2014-ST dated December 05, 2014 is arbitrary and in conflict with provisions of Section 72A of the Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner also sought a declaration that, the provisions of clause (k) of sub-section (2) of Section 94 of the Finance Act, 1994 is unguided and gives uncontrolled power of delegation.

The third prayer is with regard to a notice dated February 16, 2015.

It is submitted that the issue of vires of similar provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 initially came up for consideration before the Delhi High Court in Travelite (India) Vs. Union of India - 2014-TIOL-1304-HC-DEL-ST and it was held that such provisions were to be held ultra vires and an appeal is pending against such judgment before the Supreme Court of India; that subsequently, the provisions as impugned in the present writ petition were introduced and which too were struck down by the Delhi High Court in Mega Cabs Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India - 2016-TIOL-1061-HC-DEL-ST. Inasmuch as since the provisions have been struck down, the notice impugned herein issued on such basis needs to be quashed also.

The High Court considered the submissions and inter alia observed -

++ It appears that, Rule 5A was introduced by a notification dated December 28, 2007. Such notification inserting Rule 5A was challenged before the Delhi High Court in Travelite (India) (supra). Such provisions were struck down in Travelite (India) (supra). The same provisions as that involved in the present writ petition were assailed before the Delhi High Court in Mega Cabs Pvt. Ltd. (supra). Such provisions were also struck down. Appeals are pending against the judgment and order passed in Travelite (India) (supra) as well as Mega Cabs Pvt. Ltd. (supra). Till such time there is a decision in the appeals, the provisions stand struck down by the Delhi High Court. Therefore, it would be iniquitous to allow the respondents to proceed on the basis of provisions struck down by a High Court, against the petitioner . The impugned notice dated February 16, 2015 is, therefore, quashed.

++ So far as the declaration of ultra vires of sub-rule (2) of Rule 5A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 as substituted by the notification dated December 5, 2014 is concerned, it would be appropriate to follow Mega Cabs Pvt. Ltd. (supra). The respondents have not brought to the notice of the Court any relevant fact or law which may have weighed in the Court in taking a contrary view. In absence of such assistance, Mega Cabs Pvt. Ltd. (supra) is followed.

The Writ Petition was disposed of.

In passing:

Incidentally, the Delhi High Court order in Travelite (supra) was stayed by the Supreme Court - 2014-TIOL-101-SC-ST-LB on 18 December 2014.

Also see Board Circular 181/7/2014-ST dated 10 December 2014.

(See 2018-TIOL-1400-HC-KOL-ST)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023