News Update

Goyal discusses rising freight cost, shipping delays & congestion at the portsCustoms - First Schedule - Chapter 98 - Clarificatory explanation on 'laboratory chemical' insertedKentucky Sheriff accused of shooting dead District Judge inside courthouseM/s Konoike Transport approved as Strategic Buyer for disinvestment of FSNLCus - Gold seized from appellant & auctioned without considering cogent evidence furnished; seizure invalidated, auction proceeds be refunded with interest: CESTATIndia grants USD 50 mn budgetary support for one more year to MaldivesFATF smacks on India's back for measures to tackle illicit financeCX - Rule 4 of Central Excise Valuation Rules 2000 are rightly invoked where assessee suppresses material facts about clearance of finished goods to related entity: CESTATTMC disowns Minister’s statement that women were drinking during protestBRICS Summit: India showcases Legal Reforms and InitiativesST - For the amenities provided by service recipient, the cost thereof cannot be included in assessable value of service in hands of appellant being service provider, therefore, demand is not sustainable: CESTATChina, India are not rivals rather cooperators, says Chinese envoyRM exhorts Navy to be prepared for every situation in today's volatile global scenarioI-T - Revenue is not permitted to express different opinion based on very same facts disclosed during original assessment proceedings: HCIndia trashes report on Indian ammunition reaching UkraineI-T - No distinction to be made between direct and indirect expenses that are eligible for deduction under Section 35 D of the Income Tax Act: HCBiden hopeful of further cut in rates by FedI-T - Non-investment of sale consideration or portion thereof in designated capital gains would not come in way of assessee claiming exemption so long as assessee had invested said amount for construction: HCLanka to go to polls for New President tomorrowI-T - Assessee sought repeated adjournments without valid reason; costs of Rs 2000/- per appeal imposed on assessee; nevertheless, case remanded for de novo hearing, given tight scheduling of notices & interests of justice: ITATIsrael incinerates 1000 rocket launcher barrels of HezbollahI-T - Interest received by credit cooperative society from investment held, cannot be treated as it's operational income, as interest received is not from credit facilities provided to its members as envisaged u/s 80P(2)(a)(i): ITATSEBI hammer falls on Axis Capital; Ban imposed from acting as investment banker in debt marketI-T - Where DVO has power to estimate value independently & fails to do so, then PCIT's action to seek fresh report & revise the assessment, is outside scope of Section 263: ITATCJI asks lawyers to use SC Platform for recorded ordersNPS Vatsalya - FM launches pension scheme for minorsIP Saarthi - Govt launches AI/ML-based search engine for TrademarksNACIN hosts 3-day roundtable on IPR; Govt envisages greater role of Customs in IPR protectionUS Presidential Poll: Tall promises by Hopefuls elbow economy closer to tax-doom-loop!Fed lives up to global expectations; cuts interest rate by 0.5% - first cut in last 4 yearsMandaviya chairs meeting to provide Social Security to Gig and Platform WorkersCAQM announces revised GRAP schedule for Delhi-NCR
 
I-T - Expenses incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with transfer of assets is eligible for deduction u/s 48: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, APR 15, 2019: THE ISSUE IS - Whether expenses incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer of assets is eligible for deduction under section 48. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case

The assessee was an AOP and engaged in the activity of providing Venture Finance Assistance to Information Technology/Software units located in the state of Gujarat. The assessee holds 53,51,264/- shares of M/s 20 Microns Ltd "20 ML" which was equivalent to 43% of the total shares of 20 ML. The assessee had transferred its 26,75,632 shares of 20 Microns Ltd through the process of IPO. The assessee against such transfer of shares had claimed an expense of Rs. 50 lacs under the provisions of section 48 of the Act. However such expense claimed by the assessee was disallowed by the AO on the ground that same was not incurred in connection with such transfer of the shares. The CIT-A subsequently confirmed the view taken by the AO. Aggrieved assessee filed appeal before Tribunal.

On appeal, Tribunal held that,

++ as per the agreement between the assessee and "20 ML", there was no obligation on the assessee to incur any cost in connection with the transfer of the shares. As such it was the responsibility of "20 ML" to provide an exit route to the assessee for the disinvestment of the shares held by it. In this regard, it was noted that reimbursement of the expenses was decided in the board meeting of the assessee and after taking the report/opinion from the chartered accountant. 8 As per the report of the chartered accountant there was no prohibition for the assessee to share the cost in the IPO expenses. Therefore even the assessee was not under the obligation to incur such cost, but that cannot be the basis of disallowance of the expenses under section 48 of the Act;

++ the obligation of "20ML" was to provide the exit route to the assessee, but there was no clause or condition that the assessee shall not share the expenses in connection with the transfer. It is settled law that the AO cannot sit on the armchair of the assessee to decide/direct the business affairs of the assessee. It is the assessee who knows the best of its business affairs. The role of the AO is to establish whether the expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer of assets. There is no ambiguity that the expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer of the shares.Thus, the allegation of the AO that the assessee was not under the obligation to incur the cost for the transfer of shares has no relevance in the given facts and circumstances. The assessee is entitled to a deduction u/s 48 of the Act, for the expenses incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer of the shares. Accordingly, it was decided to reverse the order of the authorities below. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.

(See 2019-TIOL-780-ITAT-AHM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube brings you an interview with former US Secretary of Treasury, Mr. Larry Summers who was recently in Delhi.

AR not Afar by SK Rahman



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.