News Update

ICG seizes 86 kg narcotics worth Rs 600 croreChief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan concludes his official visit to France9 killed as two vehicles ram into each other in ChhattisgarhConsumer court orders Swiggy to compensate for failure to deliver Ice CreamRequisite Checks for Appeals - Court FeeI-T - Members of Settlement Commission appointed amongst persons of integrity & outstanding ability & having special knowledge in/experience of direct taxes; unfortunate that SETCOM's orders are challenged without establishing them to be contrary to law or lacking in jurisdiction: HCThe 'taxing' story of Malabar Parota, calories notwithstanding!I-T - Unless a case of bias, fraud or malice is alleged, then Department cannot assail SETCOM's order: HCCentre allows export of 99,150 MT onion to Bangladesh, UAE, Bhutan, Bahrain, Mauritius & LankaI-T- Re-assessment vide Faceless Assessment u/s 144 of I-T Act, is barred by Section 31 of IBC 2016, which is binding upon all creditors of corporate debtor: HCPension Portals of all Pension Disbursing Banks to be integratedI-T- Resolution Plan under IBC, once approved, nullifies any claims pertaining to a period prior to approval of said Plan: HC‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiI-T - Once assessee has produced all supporting documents which includes profit & loss account, balance sheet and copy of ITR of creditors, then identity & creditworthiness is established: ITATTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKI-T - Assessee shall provide monthly figures to arrive at year-end average of deposits received from members, interest paid thereon & investments made in FDs from external funds, for calculating Sec 80P deduction: ITATMaersk to invest USD 600 mn in Nigerian seaport infraI-T - It shall not be necessary to issue authorization u/s 132 separately in name of each person where authorization has been issued mentioning thereon more than one person: ITATChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killedI-T- Since facts have not yet been verified by AO, issue of CSR expenditure can be remanded back for reconsideration: ITATIndian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreI-T - Failure to substantiate cash deposits by employer during festival will not automatically lead to additions u/s 68, in absence of any opportunity of hearing: ITATGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionGST - There is no material on record to show as to why the registration is sought to be cancelled retrospectively - Order cannot be sustained: HCIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termST - Court cannot examine the issue, which is only a question of fact and evidence and not of the law - Petition dismissed: HCGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand notice
 
JK Batra appointed DG, Safeguards and DG, Specific Safeguard What is the difference?

TIOL-DDT 560
27.02.2007
Tuesday

Have a look at these two notifications.

1. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 3 of the Customs Tariff (Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty) Rules, 2002, and in supersession of notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 81/2005-Customs (N.T) issued vide G.S.R.No. 599(E) dated the 20 th September, 2005, the Central Government hereby appoints Shri J.K. Batra, Chief Commissioner of Customs, as the Director General (Specific Safeguard) for the purposes of the said rules.

2. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 3 of the Customs Tariff (Identification and Assessment of Safeguard Duty) Rules, 1997, and in supersession of notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 80/2005-Customs (N.T) issued vide G.S.R. No. 598(E) dated the 20 th September, 2005, the Central Government hereby appoints Shri J.K. Batra, Chief Commissioner of Customs, as the Director General (Safeguard) for the purposes of the said Rules.

Do you find any difference in the notifications? My editorial colleague asked me what the difference was. Couldn’t let go of DDT without answering that!.

If you look closely, you will find that the first notification is issued under the Customs Tariff (Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty) Rules, 2002, while the second one is issued under the Customs Tariff (Identification and Assessment of Safeguard Duty) Rules, 1997. And the first notification appoints Mr. Batra as Director General (Specific Safeguard) while the second notification appoints him as Director General (Safeguard).

Now what is the difference between safeguard and specific safeguard? Doesn’t safeguard include specific safeguard?

What is the mystery?

Section 8B of the Customs Tariff Act gives the Government the power to impose a safeguard duty and it is under this section that the Customs Tariff (Identification and Assessment of Safeguard Duty) Rules, 1997 have been framed.

Notwithstanding any thing said in Section 8B, as per Section 8C, if the Central government after conducting such enquiry as it deems fit, is satisfied that any article is imported into India, from the people’s Republic of China, in such condition so as to cause or threatening to cause market disruption to domestic industry, then it may, by notification in the official Gazette, impose a safeguard duty on that article. And this is the specific China safeguard duty and it is under this Section that Customs Tariff (Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty) Rules, 2002 have been issued.

Duties of the DG

Under Safeguard

Under specific Safeguard

to investigate the existence of “serious injury” or “threat of serious injury” to domestic industry as a consequence of increased import of an article into India

to investigate the existence of “market disruption” or “threat of market disruption” to domestic industry as a consequence of increased import of an article into India;

to identify the article liable for safeguard duty

to identify the article liable for safeguard duty under section 8C of the Act;

to submit his findings, provisional or otherwise to the Central Government as to the “serious injury” or “threat of serious injury” to domestic industry consequent upon increased import of an article from the specified country

to submit his findings, provisional or otherwise to the Central Government as to the existence of “market disruption” or “threat of market disruption” to the domestic industry consequent upon increased import of an article from the People’s Republic of China;

to recommend,

1. the amount of duty which if levied would be adequate to remove the injury or threat of injury to the domestic industry;

2. the duration of levy of safeguard duty and where the period  so recommended is more than a year, to recommend progressive liberalisation adequate to facilitate positive adjustment

to recommend,

1. the amount of duty which if levied would be adequate to remove the “market disruption” or “threat of market disruption” to the domestic industry;

2. the duration of levy of safeguard duty under section 8C of the Act;

to review the need for continuance of safeguard duty.

to review the need for continuance of such safeguard duty.

NOTIFICATION NO. 16 and 17/2007-Cus., (N.T.) Dated: February 22, 2007

Singapore exemption – changes in tariff heading

In the Singapore exemption Notification No. 75/2005–Customs, dated the 22nd July, 2005, for the following headings are changed.

Sl. No

Existing entry

Changed entry

1611

8443 59 20

8443 19 10

1612

8443 59 30

8443 19 20

1613

8443 59 41

8443 19 30

But Why? And what are the implications? Nothing! As you are aware, the tariff headings have undergone a major change from 1.1.2007 and these are the consequential changes  required which are being slowly done. Can’t really blame any one. This notification No. 75/2005 has 2413 entries in the table. Who can really keep track of all the changes in notifications like these? And there are many such notifications. The poor boys in the Board really have a tough time.

NOTIFICATION NO. 17/ 2007-Cus., Dated: February 22, 2007

Similar changes for Education Cess exemption

Notification No. 69/2004-Customs, dated the 9th July, 2004, exempts a large number of goods from education cess and now some amendments are made in the tariff headings in tune with the changes effective from 1.1.2007.

NOTIFICATION NO. 18/ 2007-Cus., Dated: February 22, 2007

Ink Cartridges,  duty free and ketamine to have 12,5% preferential area duty – Customs Tariff amended

The Government has amended the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act to

1. prescribe 12.5% preferential area duty for Ketamine under 3003 90 36 and 3004 90 96.

2. to prescribe free duty rate for Ink cartridges, with print head assembly, Ink spray nozzle and other Parts and accessories of goods of sub- headings 8443 31, 8443 32

NOTIFICATION NO. 15/2007-Cus., (N.T.), Dated: February 22, 2007

Exchange rates announced for imported goods and export goods

Notification Nos. 18/2007 and 19/2006-Cus., (N.T.), Dated: February 23, 2007 fix the exchange rates for imports and exports respectively with effect from 1st March 2007. Notifications 1 and 2/2007-NT-Customs, dated the 24th January, 2007 are superseded

Be with us for the budget

Tomorrow is Budget and be with us for the best incisive analyses by real experts in the field.

Until Tomorrow with more DDT

Have a nice day.

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@taxindiaonline.com


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.