News Update

VAT - If notice for completing assessment issued within limitation, then assessment order is within time even if passed beyond period of three years: HCGST - Cancellation of registration of GST has cascading effect on all other businessman who are receiving the goods from the registered person - Delay in filing appeal is condoned as petitioner has already made pre-deposit: HCGST - Impugned order was not reflecting under the tab 'view notices and orders' - Consequently, petitioner being unaware of the same could not contest validity within limitation period - Order set aside: HCGST - Respondents are well within their rights to levy GST on the royalty paid by the mineral concession holder for any mining concession granted by the State: HCDRI canon - Sleuths in SnagACC appoints two new Members for CBICJharkhand Assembly polls – voting underway for 43 seatsIndia-Russia discuss cooperation in Pulses tradeMHA tells House Panel that only 38 civilians lost their lives in North-East in 2023; skips mention of ManipurBoost for Make in India - Integrated Manufacturing Cluster coming up at GayaBangladesh seeks help for Interpol for arresting ousted PM HasinaNFRA recomments revising SCQ1, SQM1 & SQM2 standardsElon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy to run new Department of Government Efficiency in USAPFRDA invites bid for System Integrator for PFRDA Connect websiteTaliban appoints Ikramuddin Kamil as Acting Consul at MumbaiWith 11% growth, PSBs perform well in 1st half of FY 2024-25CBIC notifies Customs Tariff rates for Gold, Silver and crude oilCBDT notifies PNG Regulatory Board under Section 10(46A)(a) of I-T ActCBIC notifies ICD at Jajpur, OdishaI-T - Non-addition of any income on account of same being interest commensurate with TDS deposits, or making further enquiries would not confer PCIT with jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 : HCI-T - If there is settlement arrived at between members of Hindu undivided family, then cost with reference to acquisition of property would have to be assessed as per Sec 49(1)(i): HCI-T - Joint venture undertaking which was awarded a contract for full-fledged development of Airport, can be said to be 'developer' eligible for deduction u/s 80-IA(4): HCI-T - If tax is deductible at source, then assessee shall not be called upon to pay tax himself to extent to which tax has been deducted from that income: HCI-T - Revenue authorities are not justified in continuing retention of books of accounts and other documents contrary to provision of Sec 132(8): HCI-T- Power of revision is unwarrantedly exercised where it is based on incorrect assumption of facts: ITATST - Software imported and sold by the Appellant is import and sale of goods and is not exigible to service tax: CESTATST - Once Appellant had paid VAT on the sale of goods, service tax cannot be demanded on such sale of goods: CESTATST - Burden of proving that assessee suppressed facts with intent to evade payment of Service Tax is clearly upon the Department; is necessary for the Department to illustrate any positive act of suppression on assessee's part: CESTATCus - Where imported motor vehicle is registered & certified for compliance with Central Motor Vehicle Rules , then separate EC Type Approval Certificate under Import Licensing Note to Chapter 87 of Customs Tariff Act 1985, is not needed: CESTATCus - Substantial benefit of tax exemption cannot be denied based on procedural lapse alone; confiscation of imported vehicle is not tenable where no mis-declaration of description or classification or quantity, is involved: CESTAT

MESSAGE BOARD

   

Scope & Ambit of Works Contract


Works contract service - two principles required

To get answer for the query raised by the author, we need to understand the common principle of works contract service as defined by various States. The common thread is Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 which says works contract is a contract for carrying out any work which includes assembling, construction, building, altering, manufacturing, processing, fabricating, erection, installation, fitting out, improvement, modification, repair or commissioning of any movable or immovable property. Since Xerox machine is movable goods the transfer of property in goods is covered under works contract service where-as the service of Doctor to Patient does not fall under any of the above defined activity of works contract service even though there is a transfer of property in goods

Similarly under service tax law there is a set of activities i.e. carrying out constructin, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, alteration of any movable or immovable property etc... as per clause 54 of Sec.65B of Finance Act

Mere transfer of property in goods is not covered under works contract service - it should be for the activity defined

Posted by
G. Mani

govindan_mani govindan_mani 26/08/2014

 
Re :Works contract service - two principles required

works contract is an inclusive definition like manufacture in central excise. works contract itself is not defined. it only said it includes.. that is why xerox paper (not xerox machine) and photograph has been held as works contract. In xerox, VAT is payable on paper, toner etc. I have cited the case law in the article. Photograph was held as not works contract in Rainbow Colour Lab by SC but the same has been negated by larger bench of SC in BSNL and ACC Cement, which held it to be works contract.hence it warrants a relook

26/08/2014

 

Back

TIOL Tube Latest

Conferment of TIOL Awards 2024. The event was held on October 1, 2024 at Taj Palace, New Delhi



Technical Session I - Ease of Doing Business: GST on Digital Economy