News Update

Safari Retreats Judgement of Supreme Court: A Pyrrhic VictoryIndia’s RuPay card launched in MaldivesI-T- When the assessee has own funds and surplus is more than investments, then, the presumption is that own funds are used: ITATUS Court orders Google to welcome rival App storesI-T- Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is invalid where notice issued u/s 274 fails to specify the exact limb of penalty imposed: ITATUS to sell lightweight torpedoes worth USD 175 mn to IndiaI-T- CIT(A) empowered to consider additional evidence not furnished during assessment proceedings or which CIT(A) opines is necessary to admit for adjudicating matter; AO must necessarily have opportunity to examine such evidence: ITATLawyers, wife not to have access to Imran Khan over security concernsI-T- Re-assessment proceedings are rightly quashed where found to be based on change of opinion : ITATHurricane Milton turns into Category 5 stormCX - Spirits are denatured to be rendered unfit for human consumption - commodity tax in Constitutional scheme excludes Union's jurisdiction on spirits for human consumption - Excise tax applies to all spirits not intended for human consumption: CESTATUK sets up Regulatory Innovation Office to spur growthCX - Molasses used captively for manufacturing Undenatured ethyl alcohol, are exempt from tax - tax demand raised thereon is not sustainable: CESTATMexican mayor killed days after assuming officeCus - Unless it is established that royalty is paid as a condition of sale, it cannot be included in assesable value: CESTAT

MESSAGE BOARD

   

Irrelevance of Special Valuation Branch in Customs


Special Valuation Branch

SKODA AUTO INDIA PVT. LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA
Writ Petition No. 4776 of 2010, decided on 23-3-2011
Stay/Dispensation of pre-deposit - Valuation (Customs) - Car kits - Transfer of technology agreement - Undervaluation - Amount of US $ 45 million paid by petitioner to Skoda under the Technology Transfer Agreement whether part of the value of 45,000 car kits supplied by Skoda to petitioner from time to time - Amount recovered from customers by adopting different accounting methods - Argument that petitioner is entitled to CVD amounting to Rs. 38.5 crores hence cannot be subjected to pre-deposit, unacceptable because taking credit would arise only when duty is paid - Argument that out of demand of Rs. 97 crores, demand Rs. 23.5 crores relates to goods cleared under provisional assessment is also without any merit, because, if imported goods were found to be cleared by suppressing material facts and resorting to undervaluation and while recovering duty that escaped assessments, which are finalized, it is open to Revenue to recover duty which escaped assessment - Exercise of discretion by Tribunal in directing the petitioner to deposit Rs. 30 crores cannot be said to be unreasonable - Sections 14 and 129E of Customs Act, 1962. [paras 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]

Jayaprakash Gopinathan 08/11/2014

 

Back

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Fiscal Awards 2024.



Ms. Kavita Reddy reading the acceptance speech on behalf of Dr. Y. V. Reddy former Governor of RBI, at TOL Fiscal Awards 2024 after being conferred TOL Kautilya Global Award 2024 by Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha, Shri Harivansh Narayan Singh.