News Update

Wrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Import of Ships & Moveable Capital Goods under SFIS Scheme - DGFT clarifies to clear confusion of Customs Authorities

TIOL-DDT 1322
19.03.2010
Friday

IT appears that the Customs authorities, particularly those at Mumbai and Kakinada Sea Ports have some confusion in their minds regarding import of ships as capital goods (a moveable capital asset) under SFIS scheme. They were insisting that the importers have to furnish ‘installation certificate' for the imported ships, failing which the benefits of the SFIS scheme were being disallowed for such imports.

How on earth can a ship be installed? And where on earth are they expecting a ship to be installed – in the Custom House?

Trade and industry represented to the DGFT to resolve this confusion in the minds of the Customs. After examining the matter DGFT has clarified as follows:

a) The provision relating to disallowing import of ‘vehicle' was introduced in FTP RE 2006 (Updated as on 7.4.2006) and applies to SFIS duty credits scrips issued on foreign exchange earned during 2005-0 6 and thereafter, implying that there is no such stipulation for SFIS duty credits scrips issued for foreign exchange earned prior to 2005-06 period under the FTP. The intention of this provision is to protect the domestic sector industry of ‘ motor cars, s ports utility vehicles and the likes' and thereby disallows such imports only under SFIS Scheme.

b) Ships cannot be treated as a ‘vehicle'. Hence, it is clarified that the import of ships, a capital good for Shipping Sector, is permitted under the scheme.

c) Upon imports, ships are registered with the Director General of Shipping (or Mercantile Marine Board, as the case may be) and only then these vessels are treated as ‘ Indian Flag vessels'. Ships are moveable capital assets; hence these cannot be installe d at one particular location. Thus, the requirement of ‘installation certificate' cannot be insisted upon, for such moveable capital assets/goods. Customs Authorities are accordingly requested not to insist on furnishing ‘installation certificate' for moveable capital ass ets / goods, if imported under the SFIS scheme.

DGFT further clarifies that this clarification regarding non-requirement of installation certificate shall also apply to EPCG for Service Providers wherein import of moveable capital goods is permitted.

DGFT Policy Circular No. 26 /2009-2014, Dated: March 17, 2010

Mandatory e-payment and e-filing of returns for Central Excise and Service Tax - Hyderabad CC's Press Note

THE Chief Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Hyderabad Zone has issued a press note advising all manufacturers, dealers and service providers to avail ACES and EASIEST, e-Governance facilities of the Government of India to file their returns and deposit duty payments.

The press note refers to the two recent notifications issued by the Government of India viz., Notification No. 04/2010-CE(NT) and 01/2010-ST both dated 19.02.2010 as per which, all the assessees who have paid excise duty/service tax of Rs. 10 lakhs or more including the amount paid by utilization of CENVAT credit in the preceding financial year, shall file their returns electronically and deposit the excise duty/service tax electronically.

The Press Note warns that Non compliance would invite penal action. What if the Department is not able to comply in accepting the returns electronically?

The press note further mentions that the e-payment of excise duty and service tax can be made through twenty eight designated banks and the list of such designated banks is available at the departmental website (http://aces.gov.in). The returns could also be filed electronically on this website.

Only the other day, in TIOL-DDT 1320 17.03.2010, we reported about a letter issued by an anxious DGS & DM to all the field formations, calling their bluff on 100% implementation of ACES and exhorting them to clean up their act and ensure a smooth functioning of ACES so that the department can successfully transit into the new GST regime.

We hope that All izz well with ACES and wish the department all the very best in their e-ndeavour.

Press Note from Chief Commissioner, Hyderabad Zone, Dated: 17.03.2010

How is ACES working?

A Noida assessee tells us:

Central Excise Noida has been caught un - aware. Here in Noida Range offices, even the basic infrastructure is absent. Some are waiting for the computers and peripherals to be installed, some for the connection (internet or ACES or both).

The elementary step of allotting login ID and password has not been completed (We have not received till now for Excise or service tax).

The range Superintendent lamented that he is not aware who will do what. His immediate boss (the divisional AC/DC) is not aware whom to approach and assessees who want to login to the ACES are not able to enter in to the system.

If immediate steps are not taken then it is certain that the failure will start from Noida (which incidentally is nearest to Delhi, what would happen to the remote areas too far from power (Delhi) or electricity or both).

I wonder, what will happen to those assessees who are definitely going to miss the electronic filing of service tax and excise return on 25th and 10th of April 2010.

I tried to login and found a dumb screen with no option for doing anything.

Give the Department its due:

In sharp contrast to Noida, in dusty Bhiwadi (Jaipur) it is working perfectly since November last year.

We sincerely hope ACES don't make asses out of assessees.

Advance Ruling - DTAA with USA - provision of Architectural design services - not sale – liable to tax in India - AAR

IN an order delivered yesterday, the Authority for Advance Ruling held,

The Agreement cannot be read in isolation and the components of the contract cannot be placed in water-tight components. The agreement shall be read as a whole. The approach should be to ascertain what is the true scope and dominant object of the contract. One should take stock of the predominant features of the contract.

By taking the view that the essence of the transaction is the sale of designs, models and plans and everything else is incidental thereto is to distort and stultify the true nature and dominant purpose of the contract. The Agreement is in reality nothing different from what is described in the opening sentence i.e. “design and consultancy services”. The Architect while performing such services, will participate with and assist the owner in developing and refining the general project concept. The architect will develop the detailed programme for the project based on in depth interviews with the Owner and others.

Basic(design) services which include preparation of Master Plan, concept design, schematic design, design development and construction documents, assistance in bidding and contractors' selection process and consultancy during construction phase are all part of architectural services undertaken the HOK as per the Agreement and the payment received by HOK for furnishing all these documents and services to the applicant fall appropriately within the meaning of ‘fees for included services' under Article 12.4(b) of the India-US Treaty. They cannot be disintegrated and viewed in water-tight compartments.

We bring you this order today. See Breaking News .

Jurisprudentiol – Monday's cases

Legal Corner IconCustoms

EXIM – Writ - disbursement of Cash Compensatory Support and Replenishment Licenses – Petitioner directed to submit copies of all documents and Revenue directed to examine claims and pass speaking order - Petitioner entitled to ventilate grievances against such order in accordance with law: High Court

IN terms of EXIM Policy of 1988, the Chief Controller of Import & Export announced a scheme giving Cash Compensatory Support (CCS) and replenishment licences (REP licences) to registered exporters against export performance. The said exporter accordingly submitted applications for grant of CCS, REP licences and traditional licences against the export of ready made garments, textile products and handicrafts, which were summarily rejected by the authorities.

Consequently, the exporter filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the authorities to disburse the 45 per cent premium in lieu of the replenishment licences (REP) and to release the Cash Compensatory Support (CCS) against export documents received by them. The Petitioner also sought compensation for non-release of the incentives in terms of the prevalent EXIM policy which resulted in losses in their export business.

Central Excise

There is no condition under Rule 173H that defective goods received back should be kept in segregated manner with separate accounts – such condition is stipulated only under Rule 173L: CESTAT.

THE appellant had received back defective goods under Rule 173 H of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 for repair, remaking etc., on which duty was initially paid. They have maintained records wherever the impugned goods have been remade amounting to manufacture and in respect of such goods the appellants have again paid duty. In respect of the remaining goods only minor repairs have been done and the same have been cleared without payment of duty as permitted under Rule 173H. They have filed necessary intimation under D3 and they were not asked to follow any procedures nor any additional documents were required to be maintained by them either under the Rules or under the instructions of the Commissioner.

Income Tax

Indo-US DTAA - PSU enters into contract for supply of hardware, software and related services for installation - since software is a part of package for upgrading automation system at IGI Airport, it has no value unless technical knowledge is made available - payments are fees for included services but payments made for hardware are not taxable in India: Advance Ruling

THE Applicant is a PSU. It enters into contract with non-resident company for 'automation upgrade for third runway at IGI Airport, New Delhi'. The US-based non-resident supplies hardware, software and providing services relating to installation - whether payments made to non-resident are royalty or fees for included services. In the absence of a PE whether the payments received by the non-resident are business income. Whether the payments made for hardware are outright purchase and not taxable in India.

See our columns Monday for the judgements

Until Monday with more DDT

Have a nice weekend.

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@taxindiaonline.com


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.