News Update

WIPO data shows Chinese inventors filing highest number of AI patentsManish Sisodia’s judicial custody further extendedCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US official8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024
 
New services to be effective from May 1, 2011?

TIOL-DDT 1595
26.04.2011
Tuesday

CENTRAL Government has issued a notification in exercise of the powers conferred by clauses (A) and (B) of section 71 of the Finance Act appointing May 1, 2011 as the date on which the provisions of the said Act shall come into force.

Unfortunately, the Government has not realized that after enactment of Finance Bill 2011 into Finance Act, 2011 on April 8, 2011, there is a renumbering of the sections. In the process, section 71 of Finance Bill 2011 was renumbered as section 74 and this Notification should have been issued invoking clauses (A) and (B) of section 74 of the Finance Act, 2011 and not section 71 as mentioned therein.

Section 71 of the Finance Act deals with amendment of Rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules!

Now Government has to come out with an amendment or a corrigendum to set right this numbering fiasco that crept into this life giving Notification for new services and other amending provisions of Finance Act, 1994. Otherwise, the new services cannot really come into force on May, 1, 2011.

Notification No. 29/2011 - ST., Dated: April 25, 2011

Exemption to Services provided by Clinical Establishments

CENTRAL Government has provided exemption to taxable service referred to section 65(105)(zzzzo) of Finance Act, 1994 from the whole of levy of service tax. The exemption is effective from May 1, 2011.

It may be noted that by virtue of Finance Act, 2011, the text of clause (zzzzo) was completely replaced and the phrase ‘clinical establishment' is defined in terms of the newly amended sub-section 25a of section 65 of Finance Act, 1994.

Notification No. 30/2011 - ST., Dated: April 25, 2011

Exemption to Accommodation Service provided by Hotel, Inn etc

CENTRAL Government has provided exemption from the whole of levy of service tax on taxable service referred to in section 65(105)(zzzzw) of Finance Act, 1994 when the declared tariff for providing such accommodation is less than Rupees 1000 per day. This exemption is effective from May 1, 2011.

The Notification explains ‘declared tariff' for this purpose to include charges for all amenities provided in the unit of accommodation like furniture, air-conditioner, refrigerators etc but does not include any discount offered on the published charges for such unit.

Notification No. 31/2011 - ST., Dated: April 25, 2011

Representational services of CAs/CWAs/CSs taxable w.e.f from May 1, 2011

IN DDT 1562, we commented that “Incidentally as of now there is an exemption for CAs, Cost Accountants and Company Secretaries for representation work as per Notification No. 25/2006 - S.T DATED 13.07.2006. Most probably the government will withdraw this notification once the Finance Bill is enacted and lawyers' representation will become a taxable service. If they forget there will be a funny situation where the lawyers whose main job is to argue in courts will be taxed for their arguments while CAs will be exempted”

Now the Government is withdrawing this exemption with effect from May 1, 2011 which will bring CAs/CWAs/CSs on par with lawyers from May 1, 2011.

Notification No. 32/2011 - ST., Dated: April 25, 2011 Exemption provided for

Certain Commercial training & coaching services

CENTRAL Government has exempted from the whole of levy of service tax, ‘preschool coaching and training' and also ‘any coaching or training leading to grant of a certificate or diploma or degree or any educational qualification which is recognised by any law for the time being in force', provided by any commercial training or coaching centre. This exemption shall come into effect from May 1, 2011.

Also see our post Budget analysis story “Commercial Training or Coaching Service – Clarity of taxability only after issue of exemption notifications”.

Notification No. 33/2011 - ST., Dated: April 25, 2011

Abatement Rates Notified for Two New Services

NOTIFICATION No. 1/2006-ST dated 01.03.2006 is further amended to provide for abatement of 70% and 50% respectively for service provided by air-conditioned restaurants and accommodation service provided by hotels, inns etc.

Notification No. 34/2011 - ST., Dated: April 25, 2011

Rule 6 of Service Tax Rules Amended

IN Rule 6 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, for the existing sub-rule (7A), the following sub-rule shall be substituted, namely,-

“(7A) An insurer carrying on life insurance business shall have the option to pay tax:

(i) on the gross premium charged from a policy holder reduced by the amount allocated for investment, or savings on behalf of policy holder, if such amount is intimated to the policy holder at the time of providing of service;

(ii) 1.5 per cent of the gross amount of premium charged from a policy holder in all other cases;

towards the discharge of his service tax liability instead of paying service tax at the rate specified in section 66 of Chapter V of the said Act:

Provided that such option shall not be available in cases where the entire premium paid by the policy holder is only towards risk cover in life insurance.”

This amendment will come into force from May 1, 2011 in the wake of amendment to section 65(105)(zx) of Finance Act, 2004.

Notification No. 35/2011 - ST. , Dated: April 25, 2011

Export of Services Rules and Import of Services Rules Amended

TAXABLE services as defined in clauses (zzzzv) and (zzzzw) of section 65(105) of Finance Act, 1994 are included in clause (i) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 3 of Export of Services Rules, 2005. After this amendment, for a Hotel or Restaurant, services are to be treated as export, if they are provided “in relation to immovable property situated outside India”. What does this mean? Hotel and restaurant services are provided to immovable properties?

Similarly, taxable services as defined in clauses (zzzzv) and (zzzzw) of section 65(105) of Finance Act, 1994 are included in clause (i) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 3 of Taxation of Services (Provided from Outside India and Received in India ) Rules, 2006.

Notification Nos. 36/2011 - ST., and 37/2011 - ST., Both Dated: April 25, 2011

Anti-Dumping Duty ‘extended' on imports of Silk fabric of weight 20 to 100 gms per metre

CENTRAL Government has extended anti-dumping duty on imports of silk fabric of weight 20 to 100 gms per metre, originating in, or exported from People's Republic of China till December 5, 2011 by amending Notification No. 121/2006-Cus dated December 26, 2006.

Notification No. 37/2011-Cus., Dated: April 21, 2011

Jurisprudentiol – Wednesday's cases

Legal Corner IconIncome Tax

Income tax - Whether, for purpose of applying indexation of costs, year in which previous owner had acquired property is to be considered as relevant year for computing capital gains - YES, rules ITAT

THE issues before the Tribunal are - Whether, for the purposes of applying Indexation of costs, the year in which the previous owner had acquired the property is to be considered as the relevant year and whether in view of the fact that the fair market value has not been calculated in a fair manner, a reasonable estimate is justified to end the matter. Another question before the Bench is - Whether Department can take contrary stand for estimating FMV by enhancing the FMV when it is question of determination of sale consideration and by reducing the same when it is question of determination of LTCG. And the decision partly goes in favour of the assessee.

Service Tax

Service Tax – Liability to pay service tax on spare buses having spare bus permits – Carriages which run under public transport system where passengers have a right to board or alight according to their choice and pay fares for journey individually, do not fall under definition of ‘tourist vehicle’ under section 2(43) of Motor Vehicles Act: Madras High Court

THE petitioners filed Writ Petitions in the High Court which raises a common question as to whether the petitioner, a stage carriage operator having a spare bus permit is liable to be brought under the tax net for payment of service tax in respect of such spare bus.

Sales Tax

Sales Tax deferment Scheme under Tamilnadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 – Circular issued under Section 28A of TNGST Act is binding on the adjudicating authority – Supreme Court

THIS is a case involving deferment scheme under Tamilnadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. In order to promote the industry in specified areas, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamilnadu launched a sales tax deferment scheme and the relevant provisons of the GO ...

See our columns tomorrow for the judgements

Until Tomorrow with more DDT

Have a Nice Day.

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@taxindiaonline.com


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: FINANCE ACT - AMENDMENT OF NON-EXISTING THIRD SCHEDULE TO CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF ACT

Unfortunately, the Government has also not realized that the Parliament has amended the non-existant "Third Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985" instead of amending the Third Schedule to the Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 73 of the Finance Act, 2011 r/w the Twelfth Schedule thereto may be seen.
SURESH ASTEKAR,
Advocate, Bangalore.

Posted by SURESHASTEKAR SURESHASTEKAR
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.