News Update

Thanneer ThanneerShinde directs Pune cops to demolish all illegal pubsI-T - Assessee's additional income is taxable as 'Business Income and no addition is needed u/s 69: ITATTax protests intensify in Nairobi - 5 killed & 30 wounded in police crackdownI-T- Assessee is entitled to claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) towards interest earned on deposits with cooperative banks : ITATChennai Airport Customs arrests 10 pax for smuggling gold worth Rs 8 CrI-T- Section 69A is not applicable to transactions which are recorded in books of accounts maintained by assessee : ITATManhattan Judge eases gag order against Trump in hush-money caseI-T- Order rejecting approval u/s 80G is valid where the same is cryptic in nature & where it omits to make any reference to Section 80G or rules thereunder : ITATBrazil court rules possession of marijuana for personal consumption not a crimeI-T- The benefit of indexed cost of acquisition is applicable to an assessee while computing capital gain for the purpose of computation of book profit u/s 115JB of the Act: ITATTrudeau’s party loses by-polls in strongholdsI-T- Since assessee has filed audit report much after assessee had e-filed Form 10CCB, therefore, claim of deduction ought to have been granted : ITATPhilippines warns of region-wide conflict over South China SeaI-T- Once the timeline prescribed for filing in Form No.10AB for recognition u/s.12A of the Act, has been extended, same need to be treated as extended for forms viz., Form No.10AB for renewal of approval/recognition/registration under Clause (iii) of first proviso to sub- sec.(5) of Sec.80G of Act: ITATRussia, Ukraine exchange 90 prisoners of warCus - The refund was granted within 3 months as prescribed under Section 18 (4) of the Act, appellant is not entitled to any interest in view of statutory provisions: CESTAT50 drugs including paracetamol fail quality standardsCX - Appellant is eligible for Cenvat Credit of input and input services which are used in export of goods and are exempted from payment of Central Excise Duty: CESTAT
 
Import of Silk fabrics from China - Samples drawn by Department and testing done to ascertain weight to determine if Anti Dumping Duty is leviable on this import - AD Duty also paid by petitioner - Goods directed to be released within one week: Madras HC

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, SEPT 21, 2011: THE petitioner had imported Mulberry Silk Fabrics from China and filed Bill of Entry on 14.02.2011 and submitted documents for assessment. Petitioner declared the weight of the goods as 58 GM and 44”/45” width. During the process of clearance, the Appraising officer examined the imported goods and he found that the declared description of the goods was correct but he had a doubt regarding the weight of the goods. As per Notification No.121/06 dated 26.12.2006, Anti Dumping Duty is leviable on import of silk fabrics originating from China. Hence samples were drawn by the department and sent for testing. Test report dated 07.03.2011 stated that the Grams per Square Metre of the goods is 53.0 (GSM) which is about 60.44 gms/liner metre which attracted Anti Dumping Duty. Thereafter, request was made by the petitioner for re-testing and the re-testing revealed that the weight was 54.5 gms/Sq.Mtr. and 62.01 gms/linear metre. Consequently the petitioner was advised to pay Anti Dumping Duty of Rs.2,25,325/- and the same was also paid by the petitioner on 11.06.2011. However, after the payment of Anti Dumping Duty also, the second respondent did not proceed with the assessment and the goods were not cleared.

The petitioner contended in the Writ Petition that since the dispute is only with regard to the payment of Anti Dumping Duty and since Anti Dumping Duty has already been paid by the petitioner, the detention of goods is illegal.

High Court found that the request of the petitioner is a sustainable one since samples for testing were already drawn and the disputed Anti Dumping Duty was also paid. Accordingly, High Court directed the department to release the goods within a period of one week. Further High Court held that as far as payment made of Anti Dumping duty is concerned, it depends upon the final decision to be arrived at based on the adjudication of the show cause notice issued in this regard.

(See 2011-TIOL-601-HC-MAD-CUS in 'Customs')


POST YOUR COMMENTS