News Update

PLI scheme for electronics manufacturing sees incremental investment of Rs 8,390 CrG20 finance leaders agree to tax super-rich but forum not yet readyDPIIT promotes green logistics industry balancing economic growth and environmentIndia, US ink pact to stymie illegal trafficking of cultural propertyRailways expands tracks by 31,180 kmFroth in Yamuna river: Delhi complains to Centre against UP and HaryanaGovt to enhance reach of Indian Digital Public InfrastructureFormer BJP Minister says BJP has totally failed as Opposition in KarnatakaGovt provides incentives to small tea growersEU penalises 5 countries for infringing budget rulesI-T-Transaction involving transfer of unutilised shares cannot be deemed to be sale of shares so as to attract levy of Long Term Capital Gain u/s 112: ITATChina says Relations with Japan at critical stageST - Once the activity of appellant that is of forfeituring the amount of earnest money is not a declared service, question of retaining said money as consideration for rendering such service becomes absolutely redundant: CESTATEU medicines regulator disapproves Alzheimer’s new drugSC says no restrictions on voluntary name banners along Kanwar route eateriesFM favours debt reduction but sans affecting economic growthKargil Victory Day: PM warns Pak against practising terrorismChina pumps in subsidies worth USD 41 bn into car sectorMisc - Payments made to Government cannot be deemed to be a tax merely because statute provides for their recovery as arrears: SC CBMisc - Royalty not a tax; royalty is contractual consideration paid by mining lessee to lessor for enjoyment of mineral rights & liability to pay royalty arises out of contractual conditions of mining lease: SC CBMisc - Since power to tax mineral rights is provided for in Entry 50 of List II, Parliament cannot use its residuary powers in this subject matter: SC CBCus - Owner of goods has a liability to pay customs duty even after confiscated goods are redeemed on payment of fine - Interest follows: SC
 
Normal period of limitation under Section 11A of CE Act and Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994 enhanced

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, FEB 29, 2016: ONE of the important changes in the budget 2016 is the amendments proposed in Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994. The normal period for issue of Show Cause Notices in cases where there is no suppression of facts etc, is proposed to be amended to substitute "one year" in Section 11A with "two years" and "eighteen months" in Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 with "thirty months".

In the last Central Excise Tariff Conference, the Vizag zone had suggested that the Board should consider proposing amendment in law to the effect that in case of audit the normal period of limitation would be much longer say three years or five years.

Board seems to have accepted this partially.


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: extension of time to issue tax demands

The aggressive extension of time to issue tax demands to three years effectively in Service tax and two years in Central Excise in ordinary cases is indeed a step back in time and is a backstab(as a writer put it in TIOL) to the ideal of not making taxation retrospective.The Govt cries hoarse against it but continues to flirt with retrospective taxation. With this taxpayer-unfriendly move, tax litigation would not be quelled but would climb steeply. Taxpayers would have to keep their fingers crossed for much longer now. Tax uncertainty is put at a premium.
The state vat systems are awash with the consequences of such longer ropes to the tax babus.Taxation has become just more intractable in India.

Dr. Ravindran Pranatharthy
Advocate

Posted by Ravindran Pranatharthy
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Chairman, TIOL Knowledge Foundation, addressing the gathering



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.