News Update

Maneka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersGST - Statutory requirement to carry the necessary documents should not be made redundant - Mistake committed by appellant is not extending e-way bill after the expiry, despite such liberty being granted under the Rules attracts penalty: HCBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemST - Appellant was performing statutory functions as mandated by EPF & MP Act, and the Constitution of India, as per Board's Circular 96/7/2007-ST , services provided under Statutory obligations are not taxable: CESTATKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamI-T - Scrutiny assessment order cannot be assailed where assessee confuses it with order passed pursuant to invocation of revisionary power u/s 263: HCHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningI-T - Assessment order invalidated where passed in rushed manner to avoid being hit by impending end of limitation period: HCColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashI-T - Additions framed on account of bogus purchases merits being restricted to profit element embedded therein, where AO has not doubted sales made out of such purchases: HCIndia to host prestigious 46th Antarctic Treaty Consultative MeetingI-T - Miscellaneous Application before ITAT delayed by 1279 days without any just causes or bona fide; no relief for assessee: HCAdani Port & SEZ secures AAA RatingI-T - Assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 54EC on account of investment made in REC Bonds, provided both investments were made within period of six months as prescribed u/s 54EC: ITATNominations for Padma Awards 2025 beginsI-T - PCIT cannot invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 when there is no case of lack of enquiry or adequate enquiry on part of AO: ITATMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDOI-T - If purchases & corresponding sales were duly matched, it cannot be said that same were made out of disclosed sources of income: ITATViksit Bharat @2047: Taxes form the BedrockI-T - Reopening of assessment is invalid as while recording reasons for reopening of assessment, AO has not thoroughly examined materials available in his own record : ITAT
 
Service Tax on ocean freight - Hard days for importers?

MARCH 15, 2016

By Naval Kant Jha & Atul Bamne

IN this Finance Bill, Service tax is proposed to be levied on the transportation of goods by a vessel from outside India up to the customs station of clearance in India. The proposal perhaps has far reaching consequences to the importers who basically bear the freight charges either collected by shipping lines, forwarders etc. or pay to exporter situated outside India (prepaid charge). In both the situations, importer has to include the freight (ocean freight) in the CIF value of imported goods and pay the customs duty thereon. The effective date of levy of this service tax is 01.06.2016.

At present,service tax on such ocean freight is placed under negative list and, therefore, no service tax was payable on such freight element. Consequent upon the omission from the negative list, the person liable for payment of service tax would be the recipient of service in India; under Reverse Charge Mechanism.

Para 4.1(C ) of the D.O letter F.No. 334/8/2016 -TRU dated 29-02-2016,clarifies the new levy as under:-

"The entry in the Negative List that covers services by way of transportation of goods by an aircraft or a vessel from a place outside India up to the customs station of clearance [section 66D (p)(ii)] is proposed to be omitted with effect from 1.06.2016. Clause 146 of Finance Bill 2016 may please be seen in this regard. However such services by an aircraft will continue to be exempted by way of exemption notification [Not. No. 25/2012-ST, as amended by notification No. 09/2016-ST dated 1st March, 2016 refers]. The domestic shipping lines registered in India will pay service tax under forward charge while the services availed from foreign shipping line by a business entity located in India will get taxed under reverse charge at the hands of the business entity. The service tax so paid will be available as credit with the Indian manufacturer or service provider availing such services (subject to fulfillment of the other existing conditions). It is clarified that service tax levied on such services shall not be part of value for custom duty purposes.

In addition, Cenvat credit of eligible inputs, capital goods and input services is being allowed for providing the service by way of transportation of goods by a vessel from the customs station of clearance in India to a place outside India. Consequential amendments are being made in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 [Not. No. 23/2004-CE (N.T.), as amended by Sl. Nos. 2(b) and 5(h) of notification No. 13/2016-C.E. (N.T.) dated refers.]

(Clause 146 of the Bill refers)"

Thus, it is amply clear that the service tax has to be paid by a business entity located in India who receives services of transportation of goods in vessel from outside India. Although it is clarified that customs duty is not payable on the service tax amount, yet basic issueremains un-resolved as to how the value of taxable service will be determined in case where the transportation charges are pre-paid. In such cases, there may be situation when neither the agent nor the importer will be aware of the freight amount so as to determine the value of taxable services since the freight charges are paid by the exporter abroad. The same situation arises in case of outward freight paid by the entities in domestic "Door-step Delivery". In case of domestic home delivery unlike prepaid imports, the freight charges paid to transporters are available and, therefore, taxed at the hands of hiring entities.Contrary to this in case of "GHAR-POCH" (in Marathi meaning - Home Delivery of goods) by the exporters such freight actually paid or payable will not be ascertainable.

In this situation it is likely that the business entities who receive services of transportation of goods in vessels coming from outside India will face harrowing times unless specific modalities for determining value of taxable services are laid down.

(The authors are Superintendent, CEX& ST, Pune and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Service Tax on ocean freight - Hard days for importers

This provision applies to only consignments that are booked on FOB basis. In other words, the Bill of lading or Freight to pay will be taxed and not others.

Posted by pune3 pune
 
Sub: clarificatin in customs valuation

Quite so. Agree with the contents. i cannot see the clarification on the customs side.

R v looking forward to double taxation, service tax as well as customs, on same portion of value. Historically, aint customs value including freight.
Remember CIF Value

So also, ideally, what is proposed to be taxed under another statute needs to be cleared from under existing law by an equal piece of legislation.
a sundry clarification would not suffice.

Good article.


Posted by rajeshingale rajeshingale