News Update

IndiGo orders 30 Airbus A350s for long haulsFiling of Form 10A & 10AB: CBDT extends due date to June 30RBI to issue fresh guidelines for banks to freeze suspected bank accounts being used for cyber crimesCPGRAMS recognized as best practice in Commonwealth Secretaries of public serviceIsrael-Iran War: A close shave for Global Economy but for how long?KABIL, CSIR ink MoU for Advancing Geophysical InvestigationsI-T - If income from stock-in-trade are held as investments, then provisions of section 14A would apply to such income: ITATTRAI recommends on Infra Sharing, Spectrum Sharing & Spectrum LeasingI-T- Revisionary powers u/s 263 can't be exercised when AO has neither assumed facts incorrectly nor there is incorrect application of law : ITATTechnology Board okays funding of Dhruva Space's Solar Array ProjectI-T- Issue of interest is debatable issue on which two views are possible and AO accepted one of views for which PCIT cannot assume revisional jurisdiction: ITATHealth Secy visits Bilthoven Biologicals, discusses production of Polio VaccineI-T - Estimation of profit element from purchases should be done reasonably if assessee could not conclusively prove that purchases made are from parties as claimed, in absence of confirmations from them: ITATStudy finds Coca-Cola accounts for 11% of branded plastic pollution worldwideI-T- Triplex flats purchased are interconnected and can be considered as 'a residential unit'' as per definition of section 54F of Act : ITATDelhi HC says conspiracy against PM is a crime against StateI-T- AO omitted to probe issue of cash payments made over specified limit; revisionary power u/s 263 is rightly exercised: ITATBrazil makes new rules to streamline consumption taxesI-T-Power of revision unnecessarily exercised where AO had no scope to examine creditworthiness & genuineness of assessee's creditors: ITATBiden signs rules mandating airlines to give automatic refunds for delayed or cancelled flightsI-T-As per settled law, in absence of enabling powers, no disallowance can be made : ITATBYD trying to redefine luxury for new EV variantsGST - On the one hand, the order states registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively and on the other hand mentions that there are no dues - Order modified: HCSC asks EC to submit more info on reliability of EVMsRight to Sleep - A Legal lullaby
 
CBEC officers & other employees associations call for judicial scrutiny of cross-empowerment under IGST

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, JAN 27, 2017: THE members of IRS Association, members of Supdts. Association, members of Inspector's Association and members of Ministerial Officer's Association of Central Excise held a joint meeting yesterday and resolved:

++ to emphasize that 'Strong CBEC - Strong G.S.T - Successful GST - Strong India.'

++ to work jointly for successful implementation of GST and betterment of career prospects.

++ the decision of dividing assessees and cross empowerment of IGST should face judicial scrutiny.

++ reiterates it's commitment for successful roll out of Goods & Services Tax (GST) in the country and for achieving the objective of: One Nation, One Tax & One Market. Officers of our service have made significant contribution to the GST process and continue to do the same. However, the decision dt. 16-01-2017 has caused widespread anguish and discontent in whole of central indirect tax administration consisting of Group A, B and C officers.

++ a decision has also been taken for cross empowerment under IGST. All the service members are highly disappointed and feeling cheated over the decision apparently taken under state officers' associations' pressure. The biggest tax reform of the century should have been in conformity with the principles of responsibility and authority going together and also in conformity with the constitutional design. The decision shall weaken the centre's ability to ensure its revenues. The decision will not only adversely affect the career of revenue officers but it is not in national interest. The Centre should review the inappropriate and incorrect decision.

++ The Centre's power to levy and collect any kind of duty within the territorial waters of the Country should be exclusive domain of centre and collection being the exclusive domain of CBEC. Accordingly, the State should not be given any power to levy and collect tax within the territorial waters. The area in sea (territorial waters) upto 12 nautical miles from the Coastline falls within the territory of India. As per the Constitutional provisions this area in territorial waters is not included in the territory of any State of India. The High Seas transaction are already subject to Customs clearances and other duties of Customs are levied in lieu of Excise and VAT then why State should tax such transactions again when Customs would already impose IGST. It would only give rise to harassment of EXIM trade. Therefore, the powers to tax transactions in the territorial waters upto 12 nautical miles should vest with the Union Government. Therefore the rights to collect IGST and CGST either in the boundary of the States or area in territorial waters upto 12 nautical miles from Coastline should constitutionally vest with the Centre, and should be exercised by CBEC officers only.

++ IGST is a destination based tax. Whatever IGST is collected will be going to the destination state. Under IGST Act, based on place of supply rules the supplier will be paying IGST to Government. If State governments are cross empowered to collect IGST, it will be the origin state which will collect IGST. Audit and Detailed Scrutiny of such IGST transactions will be done by origin state for taxes due to destination state. Again what incentive is there for State Govt officers to spend time in audit and detailed scrutiny of IGST transactions which don't generate any revenue for them. Cross empowering State Govts. will lead to complications about jurisdictions when state disputes whether something is inter-state transactions or not. In present proposal, CBEC officers will be the final authority to resolve the same. It is easier said than done. Trade will suffer delays / uncertainty in the whole handing off from state to central government officers which is detrimental to business. As per the constitution only government of India is empowered to levy and collect IGST. Accordingly we strongly opposes this move of weakening of centre by transferring of rights or allowing levy and collection of IGST to States.

++ Administrative structure should also take note of parity issues with regard to officers selected through UPSC and State PSCs, and amicably position them in administration hierarchy. Moreover Supdts., Inspectors and Ministerial Cadre suitably be placed on proper parity.

++ No Customs Day Celebration on 27th January at any place;

++ observe Black Day by wearing Black Badges on 30th January on Martyrs day.


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.