News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Treading the GST Path – XXXI - ITC on Capital Goods & Rule 43

AUGUST 28, 2017

By G Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associates

Under the erstwhile Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, Rule 6 of the said Rules, dealing with a manufacturer manufacturing both dutiable and exempted goods and service provider providing taxable and exempted services, did not apply to capital goods. But, under Rule 43 of the CGST Rules, 2017, the concept of proportionate disallowance of Input Tax Credit (ITC) for use in exempt supply is made applicable for capital goods also. Let us see how it works.

To the extent capital goods are used for any non business purposes or for making any exempt supplies, ITC is not entitled.

If any capital goods are exclusively used for any non business purposes or for effecting any exempt supplies, ITC is not entitled and no credit would be credited to Electronic Credit Ledger. {Rule 43 (1) (a)}

If any capital goods are exclusively used for effecting taxable supplies / zero rated supplies (Exports and supplies to SEZ), ITC is entitled in full and such credit would be credited to the Electronic Credit Ledger. {Rule 43 (1) (b)}

ITC in respect of capital goods, other than those covered under clauses (a) and (b) of sub rule (1) of Rule 43, i.e. capital goods which are commonly used for non business purposes and / or effecting exempt supplies on the one hand and taxable supplies and / or zero rated supplies on the other hand shall be entitled to the extent of their use in effecting taxable supplies / zero rated supplies. The ITC on such common capital goods, shall first be credited to the Electronic Credit Ledger. Let us assume that in the month of July 2017, certain common capital goods have been purchased and the ITC thereon is Rs.1,20,000, which would be credited to the Electronic Credit Ledger.

If any capital goods are exclusively used only for non business purposes or for effecting only exempt supplies and hence no ITC was availed, were subsequently started being used for effecting taxable supplies also, then the following procedure should be followed. It maybe noted that if the GST paid on such capital goods has already been capitalised and depreciation claimed for such value, then no ITC can be taken for such capital goods. Assuming that no depreciation benefit has been claimed for the GST paid on such capital goods, let us assume that certain capital goods were purchased in July 2017, on payment of GST of Rs.50,000. The capital goods were used only for effecting exempt supplies until January 2017 and only from 15th January 2018, the capital goods were started being used for effecting taxable supplies also. It may be noted that for 3 quarters or part there of (July 17 to Sep 17; Oct 17 to Dec 17; and part of Jan 18), the capital goods were used exclusively for effecting exempt supplies. So ITC to an extent of 5 % of the GST paid, per quarter or part of thereof is not entitled, i.e. Rs.50,000 x 5 % x 3 = 7,500. The balance credit of Rs.42,500 can be availed in January 2018. {Rule 43 (1) (c)}.

If certain capital goods were initially used exclusively for effecting taxable supplies and hence full ITC has been availed. But subsequently, the assesse has started using the said capital goods even for effecting exempt supplies also. In such case, after reducing 5 % of the ITC originally availed for every quarter or part thereof for the period from the date of original availment of ITC and the date on which the capital goods has been started to be used commonly, the balance ITC should be considered as common credit.

Useful life of common capital goods shall be presumed as 60 months. In other words, one sixtieth of the total credit availed on common capital goods would be considered as the credit availed per month. The proportion of ineligible credit out of such one sixtieth amount shall be calculated with reference to value of exempt supply and total supply (taxable supply and exempted supply) in each month.

The above exercise has to be undertaken individually for CGST, SGST and IGST.

The following example would help in understanding the provisions.

S.No.

Details

Jan 18

Feb 18

Mar 18

Remarks

1

Total GST paid on capital goods purchases during the month

Rs.2,40,000

Rs.3,00,000

Rs.1,20,000

 

2

Out of (1) above, GST on capital goods, which are exclusively used in effecting exempt supplies

Rs.12,000

Rs.15,000

Rs.12,000

ITC is not entitled for these items.

3

Out of (2) above, GST on capital goods, which are exclusively used in effecting taxable supplies and zero rated supplies

Rs.18,000

Rs.15,000

Rs.12,000

Full ITC is entitled for these items.

4

GST paid on Capital goods purchased in July 2017, which were used only in effecting exempt supplies (and hence no ITC availed), but started to be used in effecting taxable supplies also, from the Month of March 2018

 

 

 

Rs.30,000

5

GST paid on Capital goods purchased in July 2017, which were used only in effecting taxable supplies (and hence full ITC availed), but started to be used in effecting both exempted and taxable supplies, from the Month of March 2018

 

 

 

Rs.15,000

6

Value of exempt supply made in the month

Rs.50,00,000

Rs.60,00,000

Rs.75,00,000

 

7

Value of taxable supplies and zero rated supplies made in the month

Rs.1,50,00,000

Rs.2,40,00,000

Rs.1,25,00,000

 

8

ITC in respect of common capital goods, received in the month (1) – (2) – (3)

Rs.2,10,000

Rs.2,70,000

Rs.96,000

Credited to Electronic Credit Ledger as per Rule 43 (1) (c). Tc

8.1

Addition to common capital goods (4)

 

 

Rs.25,500

Rs.30,000 – 15 % for three quarters

8.2

Addition to common capital goods (5)

 

 

Rs.12,750

Rs.15,000 – 15 % for three quarters

8.3

Total Common Credit

Rs.2,10,000

Rs.2,70,000

Rs.1,34,250

 

10

Cumulative common capital goods credit

Rs.2,10,000

Rs.4,80,000

Rs.6,14,250

 

11

Common credit for the month

RS.3,500

Rs.8,000

Rs.10,238

Common credit divided by 60

12

Credit attributable t use of capital goods in effecting exempt supply

Rs.3,500 X Rs.50,00,000 / Rs.2,00,00,000 = Rs.875

Rs.8,000 X Rs.60,00,000 / Rs.3,00,00,000 = Rs.1,600

Rs.10,238 X RS.75,00,000 / Rs.2,00,00,000 = Rs.3,839

This has to be added to the output tax liability for the month

13

Net ITC availed in the month

Rs.2,27,125

Rs.2,83,400

Rs.1,42,411

(3) + (8.3) – (12)

It may be noted that the common credit of Rs.2,10,000 availed in July 2017, shall form part of the common credit and subjected to proportionate disallowance for the next 60 months, i.e. upto June 2022. From July 2022 onwards Rs.2,10,000 shall not form part of the common credit. Similarly the common credit availed in August 2017, i.e. Rs.2,70,000 shall form part of the common credit and subjected to proportionate disallowance for the next 60 months, i.e. upto July 2022. From August 2022 onwards Rs.2,70,000 shall not form part of the common credit.

Though the above exercise seems to be highly complicated, since the same would be done automatically in the GSTR 2 return based on the information furnished, this may not pose much of difficulty in compliance.

GST Rollout - 6 Weeks After | simply inTAXicating

GST: Ek Desh Ek Kar | Episode 1

GST Rollout - One Week After | simply inTAXicating

Also See : TIOL TUBE Videos on GST

 

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: CAPITAL GOODS ITC AND TRAN1

Good analysis.

Posted by Ramadoss Vaidyanathan
 
Sub: Input Tax Credit to builders under transitional provisions

Though u/s 140(3) of the CGST Act, a registered person who was providing works contract service and was availing of the benefit of Notfn. No. 26/2012-ST dt. 20/06/12, is entitled for input tax credit in respect of inputs in stock, and the inputs contained in "Semi finished goods or finished goods held in stock on the appointed day", can the semi-finished buildings or finished buildings, as on 01/07/2017 and in respect of construction of which GST is payable, be treated as semi finished goods or finished goods for the purpose of Section 140(3)? A plain reading of this section would show that transitional credit to builders and building contractors is available only in respect of inputs lying in stock as on 01/07/17,and not on the inputs - cements, steel bars, etc contained in the buildings under construction as on 01/07/17, as the buildings are not goods . Though Sec 140(3) has been made applicable to building contractors and builders, it has been drafted keeping only the manufacturers in mind.

Rakesh Kumar
Member, CESTAT (retd.)


Posted by Demo User
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.