News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Imported goods sold in auction - Case of double taxation?

AUGUST 29, 2017

By Ashwani Kumar, Consultant

THE custodians appointed under Section 45 of the Customs Act, 1962 are responsible for the safe custody of all imported goods arriving into the notified areas until they are cleared for home consumption. Section 48 bestows the responsibility on the custodian to dispose of all goods which are not cleared within 30 days of arrival after giving notice to the importer and with the permission of the proper officer of customs. The uncleared / unclaimed / abandoned goods are disposed of as per the procedure laid down in CBEC Circular 50/2005–Cus. dated 1.12.2005.

The goods sold in auction are on AS IS WHERE IS BASIS and subject to such other Terms & Conditions. The Customs Circular referred to, provides that for each consignment sold, the custodian will file a consolidated Bill of Entry, buyer-wise,for assessment of the effective rate of duty and pay Customs duty which shall be determined by backward calculation considering the sale proceeds of unclaimed / uncleared goods as cum-duty price. (Refer to CBEC Circular 71/2001-Cus. dated 28.11.2001)

The goods imported into India have remained uncleared / unclaimed because the consignee has not come forward to clear the goods or has abandoned the goods. The Customs Act recognizes the custodian. The overseas supplier is replaced by the custodian who is authorised by the Customs Department to sell the goods. The bidder/buyer steps into the shoes of the importer.

Thus the custodian collects the bid amount / sale proceeds from the bidder / buyer and files the BOE and pays the applicable duty. It may be mentioned that the bid amount is cum-duty price. In other words the bid is inclusive of the duty factor. The Customs duty goes to the exchequer and the balance money from the sale proceeds goes into the custodian's kitty to meet his expenses of sale, warehouse charges, etc. (Refer to Section 150 of the Customs Act)

Prior to introduction of GST:

Duty structure in most of the uncleared imported goods sold was: BCD 10%, CVD 12.5%, Edu, Cess 3% and SAD 4% The custodian at the time of supply of auctioned goods was also collecting VAT applicable (13.5% in most cases) from the bidder / buyer which was eventually deposited with the State Sales Tax authorities by the custodian. The Tax Invoice issued by the custodian to the buyer of the auctioned goods reflected the description, quantity, sale value(Bid value) for the consignment sold, VAT amount and total thereof.

Scenario Post roll out of GST:

Duty structure in most of the cases: 1. BCD 10%, Edu.Cess 3% and IGST 28% / 18%.

Legal aspect: IGST Law in Section 7(2) prescribes that supply of goods imported into the territory of India before it crosses the customs frontiers of India shall be treated as supply of goods in the course of inter-State trade or commerce. Thus IGST on imported goods would be charged at the time of charging Customs duty

As per Section 2(105) of the GST Act, 2017 "supplier"' in relation to any goods or services or both, shall mean the person supplying the said goods or services or both and shall include an agent acting as such on behalf of such supplier in relation to the goods or services or both supplied;

As per Section 2(93) of the GST Act, 2017, "recipient" of supply of goods or services or both, means (a)where a consideration is payable for the supply of goods or services or both, the person who is liable to pay that consideration;

As per Section 64 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, when goods are put to sale in auction, the sale is complete on acceptance of bid. Once Customs duty paid and the BOE given ‘Out of Charge', the property in the goods is transferred from the seller / "supplier" (custodian) to the "recipient" / buyer. Thus, the transaction gets completed on sale of Customs uncleared goods by the Custodian to the bidder / buyer for a consideration.

According to one school of thought, in the GST regime,the custodian is supposed to collect applicable CGST & SGST or IGST,as the case may be, from the bidder /buyer in addition to the bid amount / sale value of the goods at the time of giving delivery of the goods. However, it appears that this arrangement tantamount to two transactions. The buyer having paid the bid price of the goods which is inclusive of the Customs duty and IGST, collecting GST once again before giving him the delivery of goods from the Customs notified area,amounts to double taxation of GST on the same goods before the goods cross the Customs barrier.

CBEC is, therefore, requested to issue clarification whether it is legally correct for the custodian to collect CGST + SGST/IGST on the sale value of the auctioned goods from the buyer at the time of delivery of goods since IGST has been levied and collected when the custodian filed the Uncleared Bill of Entry before the Customs authorities for customs clearance purposes soon after the approval of bids by Customs.

Moreover, whether the buyer of uncleared / unclaimed imported goods can claim ITC in respect of the GST/IGST paid upon sale as well as the IGST paid with BCD at the time of Customs clearance.

TIOL Netizens may also like to throw some light on the issue.

(The views expressed are strictly personal)

GST Rollout - 6 Weeks After | simply inTAXicating

GST: Ek Desh Ek Kar | Episode 1

GST Rollout - One Week After | simply inTAXicating

Also See : TIOL TUBE Videos on GST

 

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.