News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Area Based Exemptions in GST Regime

OCTOBER 10, 2017

By G Mohana Rao, Assistant Commissioner (Retd.)

The GST Council had, in its meeting dated 30th September, 2016, taken a decision that there shall be no area-based exemption to units and the existing tax benefits schemes of Centre as well as States shall not continue in GST regime. All such units are located in the States of Jammu &Kashmir, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and North Eastern States including Sikkim . The existing notifications giving effect to such schemes were rescinded by the CBEC Notification No. 21/2017-Central Excise dated 18th July, 2017. Therefore, the said units shall have to pay GST post July, 2017.

However, the government had promised central excise benefits to such units for ten years. Withdrawing from the promise made the investments of the companies in danger and turning into loss making propositions or at least the profits were likely to spiral downwards. The North East Industrial and Investment Promotion Policy (NEIIPP), 2007 itself was in danger as one of the major benefits of the policy was the excise duty exemptions for ten years. More than 4000 units located in these areas were being affected.

However, there appeared to be a silver lining. The council left it to the discretion of the respective governments to give benefits by way of budgetary supports. The Revenue Secretary in one of the interviews held in June, 2017 had stated that the Centre intended to give back 58% of the Central Tax paid by such units. The cabinet committee on economic affairs in August,2017 approved the budgetary support of Rs.27,413 crores for the said scheme. The DIPP, Ministry of Commerce was mandated to work upon and come out with a scheme to give effect to the proposals.

Now, DIPP has, vide its notification dated 5th October, 2017, brought out the scheme for providing budgetary support to the eligible units in the above mentioned areas. It says that the scheme is being offered as goodwill gesture to the manufacturers. The scheme is limited only in respect of Central tax and the Central component of the integrated tax. The states may have to devise their own budgetary schemes in case they wish to extend any such benefits.

The scheme will be effective w.e.f 1 st July, 2017 and would be operation in respect of a unit for its residual period only. For instance, a unit started commercial production in 2010 and had central excise benefits for ten years up to 2020. So, the scheme will be effective for the residual period of three years i.e. up to 2020, even though the overall scheme is valid up to 2027. Thus, the scheme will fizzle out in stages as and when the unit end their promised period of central excise benefits. However, the full amount of central taxes shall not be refunded. Only 58% of the Central tax or 29% of the integrated tax (i.e. 58% of the central component of the integrated tax) shall be given back. This is in view of the fact that 42% of the central taxes are in any case devolved to the states. Therefore, Centre is parting with its share of revenue. Now, it is states' turn to respond further!!

In case the inputs are procured from a composition dealer, the amount would be proportionately reduced to the extent the inputs are received from the composition dealers.

But, one additional restriction is that the benefit is restricted to the tax paid in cash. Any amount paid through ITC shall not be refunded. Further, a person shall have to first utilise the available credit for payment of tax and use cash to pay only when the available ITC get exhausted !!

The eligible units shall have to make application for the benefit on quarterly basis. The scheme also provides the conditions to be fulfilled, submission of affidavit cum indemnity bond and recovery provisions in case of excess or wrong claims.

( The author is Partner, Elysian Tax Advisors, Mumbai and the views expressed above are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.